How do we kill Google?

build a better botnet

>>59942117
Forget it and just be happy they haven't killed you.

>>59942117
make more botnet threads

File: Vwdionk[1].jpg (57KB, 576x382px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 576x382px

>>59942117
do a better job than they do with their gratis services like gdocs, gmail, maps, search engine, and whatever else they have

people don't give a shit about ideologies and indirect hostility like selling your data if their shit just werks and yours doesn't

File: sirpooalot.jpg (43KB, 820x420px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 820x420px

It's simple. We kill the poo.

>>59942117
DeepMind is MUCH ahead in the AI game
There's NO way to stop them now
Google will create skyNet

>>59942117
We kill the internet.

>>59942117
Teach people how to use search engines inside the websites that holds the information they seek. For example:

Instead of typing "graphic cards wikipedia" on google, just type wikipedia.com to the link bar and type "graphic cards" to the built in search engine of wikipedia.

This is how you fight.

>>59942609
if only all websites had a search function on par with wikipedia's. Many of them are complete shit, and every single website that uses tagged content has mistagged tons of shit or uses retarded/too few/too many tags.

Stop buying things.

Advertising doesn't work if you don't buy things.

>>59942638
Aahh, advertisements. Those things I haven't seen in my daily browsing for years? Yeah I remember those vaguely...

good fucking riddance, I haven't had to put up with ads in ages

By seizing control for the people

>>59942609
Yeah, not going to do that. Twice as many mouse movements and twice as many pages to load.

>>59942633
I personally use the built in search engines of the websites I use, daily. Basically these websites are not regulated by companies those worth billions so of course you can't search conplete sentences. The key to reach the information or data you seek is typing in the most relevant keywords in the search bar. Not using too many words also helps.

>>59942117
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCzitO446ZY

>>59942683
>>59942609
And besides, how do I know which website holds the information I want?
>inb4 jewjewgo and shit

>>59942744
Tell me what kind of information do you want to find and I can immediately name a generic, widely known website which holds the information you seek.

>>59942729
You missed my point that no matter how well you try to search, some websites are just inherently shit, developed by apes, and will never have a search function that works at all

File: fug.jpg (61KB, 600x797px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x797px

>>59942421
But for every poo you kill, two more come and take it's place (and your job)
What then?

>>59942117
+ Search people for make a team
+ Create your own AI
+ Enjoy

>>59942768
And I am telling you it just werks for me for the past 2 fucking years. This link might suit your needs:

https://knowledge.hubspot.com/keyword-user-guide-v2/understanding-keywords

>>59942117

Build a loo and they will leave

>>59942804
>it
I know what fucking keywords are and how to properly search, you ape. Reading comprehension, do you have it?

Some websites are shit, programmed by utter idiots, and put together so badly their search engine is literally objectively defunct and they're too fucking stupid to fix it.

>>59942763
Cit from my last google searches
>why is $BASH_VERSION empty while bash runs my login
>phone number <local pizzeria>
><description of website I can't remember the name of>

Don't google the first, and don't waste your time on so

>>59942847
Also many search functions on sites that do work have pitfalls, or unnoticeable flaws, or the content itself is miscategorized so you think it's working and then find out eons later it was pulling your leg and giving you incomplete results.

>>59942847
Far from topic insult and repetitive statements indicates that you are triggered (just gave me a little smirk). You may conveniently use search engines. But don't come up to to /g/, completely butt devastated about the fact that your interviewer questioned you about the "loli anime fetish porno" you have searched 3 years ago.

>>59942933
>repetitive statements
having to repeat my point because you keep handwaving it away with an unrelated non-counterpoint does not make it wrong

I will rarely use a site's own search function because while most are good, some are inherently defunct shit that give you incomplete results and whatnot. I rather just use google which always works in my experience than trust that whatever search function website x has is a good one and hope not to have to find out afterwards I was being misled. Prevention > cure

>>59942933
> "loli anime fetish porno" you have searched 3 years ago.
>what is projection

>>59943040
Projecting the general 4chan populate to the of its' users makes sense actually. You can go to /b/ and search for the "loli thread" if it doesn't come up on the first page. In that moment, you will realize that this website is filled with pedophiles and the whole "Anonymous" thing kickstarted from there.

>>59943087
I'm the guy you were having beef with

I think loli is fucking annoying and a boner-killer

I'm into futa amazon goddesses

>>59942117
Impossible. They're too powerful.

USE BING
KEK

Make adblockers mainstream. That's 95% of google's revenue.

>>59943399
Ebin

.AND
D
X

M)IHJIIO8900

First you must kill you're self.

>>59943417
Bot?

Corrupt their data with "noise"

File: 1466039902009.jpg (635KB, 2900x1960px) Image search: [Google]

635KB, 2900x1960px

>>59942421
this train is filled with future american tech company CEOs, i hope so at least

File: C7xzf1MU8AAFl5u.jpg (204KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1024x768px

>>59942289
This image was so obviously made by someone with zero mechanical inclination, and it never fails to upset me.

Your post is spot on though.

>>59943450
Honestly, how do we stop this shit?
There is like a billion of them currently alive. Is nuking that place the only solution?

is duckduckgo still the most acceptable alternative search engine? does it even matter if I am using it on a chromebook?

File: bako.jpg (111KB, 810x810px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 810x810px

>>59942117
They got your porn history too, bud?

Domestic terrorism.

File: IMG_6063.jpg (140KB, 1242x833px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1242x833px

>>59943888
This.

It's too late, they've already branched out from their core business. The only thing that can kill Google now is a PR disaster or a shift away from the current situation so radical that they can't keep up with it.

>>59942771
We tell them that using the toilet is a prerequisite to get any tech job

>>59944024
>branched out of their core business
Not even close.

Teach them how to install Gentoo and Arch

>>59944402
But ChromeOS is Gentoo (albeit bastardized).

>>59942117
You can't kill the Google. The Google will live on. Bing tried to kill the Google, but they failed, as they were smite to the ground.

File: 1470347470279.jpg (60KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x500px

>>59942117

Not even SJWs can kill google. Just give up.

>>59943462
I think that car is the Hammerhead Eagle iThrust from Top Gear.

full decentralization of the internet from the top down
make FOSS mainstream

>>59943565
>nuke India
>Pajeets turn into ghouls
>they are even nastier than they are now
Not sure if that is such a good idea.

>>59944056
Kek

File: 1492293573177.png (142KB, 671x264px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 671x264px

>>59942677

>>59944598
So urbit will kill Google?

File: 1487974573658.jpg (282KB, 718x960px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 718x960px

>>59944056

Enforce anti-trust law. They have surpassed ExxonMobile as the largest lobbiest in the US.

>>59944024
>a PR disaster
They survived the wage fixing prosecution with nary a blip and that's about as big PR disaster as you can get.

>>59942117
By nuclear weapon from North Korea

>>59947173

A security breach with stolen information of people who "matter" will bust them wide open like a gay man at a glory hole.