What do you guys think of QA testers?

http://www.leisuretown.com/library/qac/2.html

>>59939224
Useless.

You'll never need them as long as you don't hire pajeets.

>>59939261

This is why I hated working with devs. They all think they're fucking god's gift, and god forbid you should find a bug. They then blame it on the crap code they stole from pastebin.

Only ever worked with one who I could truly collaborate with and it was fantastic. We turned out some great applications.

>>59939261
That's simply incorrect.

No testing a self driving car for instance? Good luck with those lawsuits when it plows through a crowd of people.

You sound like a shitty butthurt programmer.

Much of our tech today would literally be impossible without them. Many testers are also engineers.

>>59939629
>Much of our tech today would literally be impossible without them
Because it's saturated with pajeets! Thanks for proving me right...

>>59939766
It definitely is, I wont deny that. But you honestly think software and hardware can be done with no qa?

We'd still be playing Atari 2600 games if so. Even modern games are filled with bugs with huge teams of programmers and qa. Maybe you bug test your own code which is great.

>>59939224
Never needed them. Then again I don't shit in the streets.

>>59939261

>I don't make mistakes, look at me

>>59939927
>>59940774
Butthurt street-shitters detected.

could be said that they are hardly people, but that would be too kind for their ilk

>>59939261
>>59939766
>>59940731
>>59940789
>>59940796
Are these the same people who defend C by saying it's okay as long as you don't make any bugs and only incompetent pajeets hate it?

>>59940821
Is that somehow not true?

>>59940858
It is true, he's just an angry rajesh.

"QA" and "testing" are just codewords for "fixing Raj's mistakes".

>>59940796
That's pretty harsh

why are froggos the best

>>59939235
Lmao what the fuck is this