use vim.

gedit

>>59922691
spacemacs

>>59922691
>Using an editor made by a cuckold who wants you to give money to niggers.

Notepad++

use awk

:r!neofetch -L

>>59922739
>Personal views of developer makes his software less functional

May be relevant when choosing who to give your money to, but this is FOSS

How about use emacs instead?

File: Nano_2.1.2-svn.png (48KB, 690x436px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 690x436px

>>59922691
If you ever need to edit something via the terminal, use nano, but this should rarely happen.

>>59922691
ok :)

>>59922841
That 50 should be a macro.

>>59922841
But vim is hard. No it's not.
how is typing :x to save & exit harder than nano?
How to find and replace is something you should know anyway.
>bash history
!!:s/old/new
>sed
sed 's/old/new/g'
>vim
:s/old/new
There's you're basic text editting.

nano

>>59922841
>Should rarely happen
Is this /g/ or /normie/?

>>59922841
Windows has bash now. It's OK to admit command line is a useful tool and not to be feared. Update your talking points, Pajeet.

>baby modal editing single button commands
but emacs makes you a full on wizard, performing magic with simple commands executed through a complex sequences of chords

>>59923077
Don't forget the foot pedals. Personally I use a whole drum set.

File: Screenshot 2017-04-14 21.46.19.png (3MB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1440x900px

>>59922691
I do.

>>59922691
Can I configure vim to have a few rows with functions to click on, linke nano?, And to always just insert the letter if i'm not pressing crtl or alt?

>Try emacs.
>Get drive-by shot for flashing rival gang signs.

>>59922691
what else ?

>>59922876
tripfag is correct

>>59923077
>>59923184
You can run commands by name, like a CLI. The commands can be arbitrarily complex, like fix-this-sjw-shit or insert-python-with-c-extensions-project-template-preuploaded-to-pypi

I forgot to reply last time oops

>>59900272
Osx
>>59900949
https://github.com/metakirby5/.dots