THANK YOU BASED INTEL AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

>>59917879
>AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
AMD has been bankrupt for years

>>59917879
What's the difference?

>cannonlake
Lol, you mean that Skylake dieshrink that's coming out in 2 core variants around New Years and the 4 core version in August 2018?

tl note: tops out at 4 cores


Also

http://www.infoworld.com/article/3186781/processors/intels-cannonlake-pc-chip-shipments-may-slip-into-next-year.html

>Those 8th Generation Core laptops may be more attractive to customers. The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.


SLOWER THAN 14NM CHIPS
AHAHAHAHAAH

File: 1285250880051.jpg (24KB, 422x314px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 422x314px

>>59918457
>JustWait(TM)
>it gets slower

HOLY SHIT A HANDFUL OF 3.1 USB PORTS THIS IS GAME CHANGING THANK YOU SO MUCH BRIAN (SHALOM MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS FROM ISRAEL)

>>59918457
Are you stupid or just plain retarded?

This is the chipset, it has nothing to do with the CPU

>>59918457
Is Intel reliving their modern version of Bulldozer? Netburst wasn't enough?

>>59918457
>with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.


JUST
WAIT


Might as well just wait for their new arch in 2021.

File: 1488693519789.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>59918457
the human eye can only see 10nm per second anyway

File: 14878984098.gif (16KB, 722x426px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 722x426px

>>59918488
It's got everything to do with the CPU because this is a cannonlake PCH and it needs a cannolake socket, it's not backward compatible with Kaby/Skylake

Also all it literally adds is more USB ports from the CHIPSET, CPUs already have USB on them already and that's lower latency.

Who the fuck needs a chipset anymore with the advent of SoCs?

>>59918457
>slower

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

File: 1336755899217.png (192KB, 372x375px)

192KB, 372x375px

>>59918457
>The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years.


Intel completely imploded after getting competition.
It's fucking amazing.

>>59918568
Yeah, thanks for confirming you're retarded

Coffee Lake & Cannonlake uses the same LGA1151 socket that Skylake & Kaby Lake uses

Stay mad, AYYMDPOORFAG

>>59918587
>Coffee Lake & Cannonlake uses the same LGA1151 socket

sauce please, proof you are not talking out of your ass, schlomo

>>59917879
>base 8 core is still a i7 that costs $1000usd+
screencap this

>>59918587
>Skylake, Kabylake, Coffelake and Cannonlake use the same socket

I lold

File: 1488745167950.jpg (171KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 800x800px

>>59918582
>Intel completely imploded after getting competition

best timeline

>>59918457
>What's the difference?
6 FREAKING USB 3.1 PORTS

>>59918611
>>59918618
https://benchlife.info/intel-z370-q370-b350-h310-pch-for-coffe-lake-04162017/

>Intel 300 系列桌上型處理器用主機板晶片代號為 Cannon Lake PCH-H,就目前知道的,依舊會維持在 LGA1151 腳位,至於是否想容 Kaby Lake 與 Skylake 平台處理器,這就得視牙膏廠的決定。

Stay mad, AYYMDPOORFAGS

>>59918636
>intel realize they can't milk consumer with a new socket each 1% upgrade (((they))) make

based AMD Ryzen keeps on giving, dont you think rabbi?

>>59918636
Unless you are a gaymer you value #cores over single thread performance.

>>59918636
Okay, I concede on the socket part, but what's the point of cannonlake desktop that's coming out in august 2018 when it's skylake shrink?

>>59918664
No, a brainless moron like you simply can't think

It's logical it will be on LGA1151 because it's not a new microarchitecture

Icelake is the next Intel CPU microarchitecture and will use a new socket

Keep on licking AYYMD's ass though, I'm sure you love being an asslicker

>>59918457
SAY IT WITH ME EVERYONE

SLOWER
THAN
14NM

>>59918677
Your delidlake won't use 220W when overclocked but only 195W

>>59917879
THANK YOU INTEL I CAN FINALLY RUN ALL MY 3.1 DONGLES

>>59918698
SLOWER
THAN
14NM

File: amada.jpg (212KB, 1270x1752px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1270x1752px

>>59918685
did you lick the cum of your jewish overlords used as TIM in the 7700k? you pleased them very well, filthy goyim

>Keep on licking AYYMD's ass though, I'm sure you love being an asslicker

I'd love to lick Amada's ass tbqh famalam

>>59918698
SLOWER THAN 14NM
HOW THE FUCK DO YOU FUCK UP DIESHRINK THIS HARD.

>>59918457
DELIDDDD THIS

File: Intel.png (162KB, 633x900px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 633x900px

>>59918457
>10nm slower than 14nm

>>59918457
SO...THIS..... Is....THE....POWER.....OF......SKYLAKE.....DIESHRINK.....!

>>59918808
They'll have an upgrade card for the nominal fee of $30USD.

File: FineWine™.png (69KB, 952x1075px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 952x1075px

>>59918457
>meanwhile at AMD performance updates for free

this kills the rabbi

File: 14nm.jpg (186KB, 1529x836px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1529x836px

>59918470
10nm is still faster than 14nm+ in the chart

>>59918457
>>59917879
Wow, OP, that totally backfired your attempt at shilling Intel

>>59918850
Yeah, only first gen 14nm, kabylake is already on 14nm++

And 10nm is in fact slower than 14nm++ in that chart

wtf i love ayymd now

>>59918873
Even 10nm+ is slower than 14nm++


Canonlake clockspeeds will be atrocious

>59918873
fixed
Broadwell 14nm
Skylake 14nm
Broadwell-E 14nm
Kabylake 14nm+
Coffeelake 14nm++

File: [kyouko].gif (1MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x270px

>>59918850
>JustWait(TM) til 2020 to get faster

Is this supposed to be a joke?

>>59918873
how can 10nm be slower than 14nm on same process? by virtue alone, smaller means you can cram in more shit on to die, meaning better performance or lower heat/power use for the same performance. Doesnt fucking make sense.

>>59918892
>>Coffeelake 14nm++
Also Q1 2018

>>59918893
No, every fucking time someone competes, Intel enters panic mode and fucks up. See Netburst.

>59918908
It's clock speed not the ipc gains from it.
Penryn was slightly faster than Conroe at the same clocks

>>59918908
Transistor performance is slower, as in lower clocks.
Also adding more transistors doesn't make your core faster any longer, Intel learned that a few years ago.
It's not really surprising a virgin 10nm process can't come close to a very mature 14nm process in clockspeed.

>59918914

Q4 2017 is the new date due to AMD

File: 1363246402803.jpg (134KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 413x395px

>>59918850
>>59918873
>>59918878
maybe intell should hire more diversity instead of merit? that will fix it! diversity is always better than merit!

>>59918937
>>59918892
QUOTE FUNCTION
NIGGER

>>59918934
So add more cores with the extra transistors instead of increased each core transistor amount, you increase amount of cores you have, i mean its 10nm, so its like 30% smaller, 6-8cores should be standard.

>>59918968
>So add more cores
Cannonlake(10nm) is 4 cores
Because yields are horrible.

>>59918997
so im guessing its low power/laptop only, they wont release this shit on pc

>>59919009
Obviously they will, but considering >>59918850
there's no point in releasing it until they get clocks up to at least Kabylake levels.
Because it will be slower and can you imagine the fucking shitstorm?

>>59919024
ye, exactly what i mean, they wont release it until its faster than 14nm and keep it at select low power devices only

>>59917879
>get on /g/
>see beloved Intel spec sheet thread
>think AMD is gonna get obliterated
>open thread
>toes curl in anticipation of AMD's impending death
>cum while looking at technical sheet
>read 2 posts down
>cock retreats back into bladder from shame

>>59919089
>cock retreats back into bladder from shame

kek, take a (you) my friend

>>59918968
>>59918997
they'll eventually release 20+ cores cannonlake xeon

>>59919205
> that will be $3500 please

>>59918457
>IT
>GETS
>FUCKING
>WORSE
Holy shit Intel just end yourself. For fucks sake hire some fucking quality engineers instead of wasting money on Feminist Frequency.

>>59917884
yet they seem to still walk the earth somehow
financial zombies maybe?

50% more cores, clocks higher than 7th gen

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/g-skill-launches-ddr4-4333mhz-16gb-memory-kit-and-reaches-ddr4-4500-mhz-speed.html

>>59918488
>Chipset isn't important
>Except when it's AMD's chipset then it is

Intelshills, everyone.

>>59920060
Canonlake is 4 core.
And only in q2-q3 2018.

>>59920121
6 core Coffeelake

>>59920163
That's still 14nm, and Q4 2017 at soonest, might as well wait out for zen+ in Q1

>>59920163
That's another skylake refresh. Also a fucking housefire.

>>59920163
>10nm yield mess
>lower performance from 14nm++ to 10nm
>6 jewish Cores Inside™ , they love a good housefire

yeah how about a good CPU for a low price?

>>59918685
This is the level that Intel shitposters have been forced to sink to. "Intel won't screw you over like last time with their socket switches! AMD BTFO!" What a fucking cuck.

>>59920163
You expecting anything close to 5.0 from that? That shit will pull over 300w even if it does go that high, which I doubt at best.

When is Krzanich getting fucking booted? this cuck has stagnated intel.

>>59920225
The sooner the fucking better.

>
>>59920225
How much time would it take for a new ceo to fix things? AMD is releasing shit month after month.

>>59918762
Well if you read the article it said that it has fewer transistors than its 14nm counterparts, because I believe the article was based on the low power 10nm chips.

>>59920276
How long did it take for AMD to unfuck themselves? Multiply this by several times due to sheer size of Intel.

>>59920206
It will draw more than 300w but who uses air cooling?

>>59919024
It'll just be desktop Broadwell again. Much lower clocks than its predecessor and unable to overclock for shit, though it was because of the L4 cache in that case.

>>59920319
>>59920319
The socket and mobo can't handle that much current.

Noob shit here.

Why the fuck doesn't Intel or AyyMD for the lols do a 45nm CPU for higher clocks but beast power consumption?

>>59920466
Because that's dumb and I'm not explaining you the very basics of transistors.

File: phasechange.jpg (545KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 1920x1080px

>>59920359
The top end boards will handle it fine
esp the pic related

File: Screenshot from 27-03-2017 18:07:18.png (208KB, 458x572px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 458x572px

Just a reminder of Housefire technology

File: Screenshot from 25-02-2016 14:05:08.png (266KB, 606x507px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 606x507px

>>59920699
>1.52v

5.8 / 5.5 and stronger vrms than the X370 Taichi

>>59920702

28C 2.5ghz 205W 2667mhz memory
Naples is 32C 200W at ? 2400mhz memory

>>59920918
>2667mhz memory
That's for SR kits. No one uses SR in enterprise.

>>59920918
Wut? These things go with 64GB+ DIMMs, which are all either 4 rank or 8 rank and at 2133MHz

File: Screenshot from 18-03-2017 21:53:15.png (948KB, 1920x945px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 1920x945px

>>59920918
>>59920918
Naples seem to be 180W, there might be a higher clocked 200W version though

>>59920973
>32 DIMMs for 2P boards
What in ungodly fuck is THAT?

File: 8e0e936d5df168cb43ccd28b84db754a.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x500px

>>59917879
If you're interested in advertising on 4chan.org (including but not limited to this board), you'll need to speak with administration to discuss monthly rates, as well as terms and conditions. Thank you.

>>59920973
8 core Ryzen at 3GHz and full load consumes under 50 watt.
A 200W Naples would therefore clock at around 3GHz on all cores.

>>59921009
8 channels per socket thats what.

File: 1492129673204.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>59918457

/thread

File: 1424119895312.png (1MB, 1160x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1160x1080px

>>59918698
SLOWER THAN 14NM
L
O
W
E
R

T
H
A
N

1
4
N
M

K
E
K

>>59921047
Oh. This kills the jew.

File: 1492129465417.jpg (22KB, 500x396px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x396px

>>59918547

10/10

>>59920973
>B0
Literally clocks from September/August 2016, I can only imagine what the situation will be in June

>>59920699
"Handling" it enough to run a benchmark is a lot different from "handling" it 24/7.

>>59917879
Literally nothing of note.

A socket change next year keeps the goyim in fear.

>>59917879

>release new generation of processors
>only add usb 3.1
>innovation

Intel is apple of the cpu game

File: 1489100922662.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>59918457
>SLOWER THAN 14NM CHIPS
NOOOOOOOOOO

File: C7nTvilUwAIzgxr.jpg (180KB, 769x992px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 769x992px

>>59917879

File: 124236546.jpg (50KB, 680x722px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 680x722px

>>59918547
underrated post

>>59921241
AMD does the same thing. All chip manufacturers selling products in the US must comply or face restrictions on the US market.

File: 1491110065968.jpg (84KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1280x720px

>>59918457
>can't enjoy process advantage over AMD
I hope Intel get fucked even harder by the newer gens of Ryzen in the future.

>>59921359
Zen+ should have an 15% IPC increase. But that may be higher/lower considering ryzen had another 10% than expectation.
Also there was something left out of Ryzen that should be fully function with Zen+. I forget what, but I remember it was a good concept.
Also zen+ will clock significantly better.
Will be released in another 6? months.
All and all, Intel's fucked.

>>59920699
Maybe you can pay a guy to refill the ln2 for you while you game.

>>59921414
Hardware, software issues should be ironed out as well.

>>59921438
It's a phase change cooler

>>59918782

>DELIDDDD THIS

Thank you for the kek.

>>59921414
>Also there was something left out of Ryzen that should be fully function with Zen+. I forget what, but I remember it was a good concept.
Beefier FPU.

Hey dummies, cannon lake is mobile only who gives a fuck if it's a few % slower?
Desktop 300 series chipset is for Coffee Lake up to 6 core chips that are 14nm.

>>59921736
And are absolute house fires.

>>59921748
You've tested one?

>>59921748
>kabylake with 4 cores OCd uses over 200 watts
>somehow kabylake with 6 cores OCd will use less

>>59921754
Yes. I no longer have the results. Unless you count charred stumps.
If you think they're going to have much better temps than delidlake, you've been vastly lied to.

>>59921781
Skylake was fine. It's just another revision of that. It's hardly impossible that they could make some improvements.

File: 7700k.jpg (442KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1920x1080px

>>59921774
6 cores will draw 300W at 5ghz with low uncore

5.4/5.2 at 1.360v

>>59921798
I FINALLY STOPPED LAUGHING.
At best it'll come with a soldered lid.

>>59921414
>Also there was something left out of Ryzen that should be fully function with Zen+. I forget what, but I remember it was a good concept.
full speed interconnect between CCXs

>>59921241
I wish there was proof of this

I want to believe