Women = better coders

File: anon5.png (5KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 225x225px

>>59916106
So why aren't there any women putting out any C or ASM code? Why are they all a bunch of stupid web devs than can't manage their own memory?

honestly, i think women--or people behaving in the "woman" gender role--are better suited to live in and build a modern society. having a bunch of men around is useful if you don't have mechanization, but for a world that requires getting along with others and functioning as a community, women are more optimal. i think, also, that women tend to be better at "skill" work, like needlepoint, or programming computers. they live longer too, and have more functional years.

>>59916122
>loud_autistic_nonsense(3).wav

File: 11212324.jpg (110KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x800px

>>59916139
That doesn't look like a github link to me.

File: 1472699364280.jpg (33KB, 373x550px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 373x550px

this is the saddest attempt at bait ever
what are your tax dollars going to brits?

>girls are better coders
>no they aren't
>misogynist claim women are inferior to men
>rampant sexism t in tech

>>59916106
What KIND of coding changes?
I have a hard time believing this at face value.

Not because I think women are better or worse at programming than men; but because I DON'T think there would be a significant difference one way or the other.

So I'd like to know if they were fixing typos, adding features, fixing bugs, or just updating the Project Code of Ethics.

>>59916106
>bbc
>news
pick one

they are no better than the onion at this point.

File: 1466450783118.jpg (1MB, 1468x1548px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1468x1548px

>>59916124
>a world that requires getting along with others and functioning as a community, women are more optimal.

File: 8d0.jpg (18KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x500px

>>59916124

>This thread again
The study says that they determined these people to be girls based on what they believed were feminine features on their accounts. Essentially, if it had a picture of an anime they would label them as a girl.

>>59916186

so basically people with autism is more likely to check in good code?

>>59916186
>if it had a picture of an anime they would label them as a girl
All guys and one tranny. I guarantee it.

>>59916106
I think this may be true, to me it's almost obvious that software coding changes suggested by women would be better.

>>59916122
>So why aren't there any women putting out any C or ASM code?
Oh, but they are.

Here is an example:
https://twitter.com/isislovecruft

There are women coders writing C. It's just that they are rare. Really rare. And this is why I absolutely think that coding changes by women could be better.

Think about it. These are just out of a hat numbers but just to give you an idea; Perhaps one in 10000 women take the time to learn how to code. Perhaps 1 of 100 men learn code. It makes totally sense that the one woman who does take the time to learn how to code really studies it and makes an effort.

>>59916174
> "woman" gender role--are better suited to live in and build a modern society
Those are two different things. The first could be true. The second is absolutely not true. Women can't build a working society. Look at history. There are zero examples of women building up a society and numerous very good examples of women ruining a society. When a society reaches a higher level they tend to start demanding various forms of welfare and burdens on that society which eventually brings about it's downfall.

>>59916155
>>girls are better coders
>>no they aren't
I really do think that the women who actually code are better at it. Girls in general? No, probably not.. but we can't really know, can we? There are a lot of boys who take an interest in coding at an early age. A lot of men know how to code. This means that we can say something meaningful about how men code. Very few girls are interested in coding, that's rare. Very few women learn how to code. There's really way to few of them to judge one way or the other.

>>59916106
>assuming genders
Fuck off Drumpfatrd!

File: 1491979213937.jpg (153KB, 915x1623px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 915x1623px

>>59916274
>Here is an example:
>https://twitter.com/isislovecruft
It looks like a regular woman's shitty twitter account, just with little bits of tech news sprinkled in. Where is the code?

>>59916106
Kike detected

>>59916122
Wrong. The maintainer for libreboot is a woman.

>>59916106
Now remove the """""women""""" and post that result.

>>59916213
People who spam PRs with their real name until one sticks to make their profile look good to HR recruiters are usually less likely to have their stuff merged in compared to real programmers that just want to contribute to a project they care about.

File: 1482434658366.png (258KB, 635x457px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 635x457px

>>59916274
>https://twitter.com/isislovecruft
>they/them
Is it so much to ask for every programmer on twitter not to be so mentally fucking ill? Jesus christ.

File: 1491979133944.png (55KB, 852x1256px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 852x1256px

>>59916318
Women do not have penises.

>>59916274
>I really do think that the women who actually code are better at it.
>There are a lot of boys who take an interest in coding
>A lot of men know how to code
>code code code
IT'S CALLED PROGRAMMING YOU ASININE FUCKLORD
CODE IS A GODDAMN NOUN

File: 476deed5dd16694f57efdbe0ade568a8.jpg (81KB, 736x1105px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 736x1105px

>>59916310
There is this thing called the internet and on this internet there are search engines.

https://github.com/isislovecruft?tab=repositories

>>59916376
You appear to be a triggered. That's sad. Here, enjoy a picture Park Cho-a from AOA.

>>59916106
Name one good piece of software written by a woman?

>>59916274
>python
>good programmers
I'm ready to buy that maybe women are better, but fuck you, you're not helping that argument (which is probably what you intended)

>>59916106

>the entirety of fucking github

so this research is probably hot ass.

Well, all women are autists. I study c and c++ in university, girls have the best results

>>59916106
>Higher approval ratings than men

More like approved so the manager can have sex with her later. Might as well put out stats that say Females are better coders!

>>59916157
>So I'd like to know if they were fixing typos, adding features, fixing bugs, or just updating the Project Code of Ethics.
Whoa, you want details?

I mean, to start off with, they were just guessing the genders.
>either because it was clear from the users' profiles or because their email addresses could be matched with the Google + social network.

>The paper is awaiting peer review.
So did it get reviewed in the end? This is a study from last year.

>>59917367
>but only if their gender was not identifiable.

you literally can't read to the end of a sentence. hmm, wonder if you can code better than a woman

>>59917385
If the gender was unidentifiable how can they know they're women?

Checkmate.

>>59916318
>woman
It has a dick.

I guarantee that's the case with 99% of the """"women"""" coders. They are actually men.

>>59916106
>but only if their gender was not identifiable.
How the fuck do you identify someone's gender based on their code?

Ayyy.

>ls
>cd
>cd
>ls
>cd code
>

Kek
Woman fuck off

>>59917489
That's the point anon. Were you confused by the article?

>>59917555
No, I'm confused by OP's incoherent sentence.

>>59916106
Even if that were true, that still won't make women want to be programmers. Except for a handful of screeching feminists who only want it so they can inject their political shit into software.

>>59917506
I don't know why /g/ is so triggered by this.

90% of my bash history is ls and cd .. or cd <up-one-level>

>>59917579
>there are no genuinely autistic women

>>59917583
The point was that she couldn't even figure out what was she doing wrong when she typed cd.. and didn't go up one level. The guy you replied to missed those dots, so I doubt he knows much more then Klossy, but it's fine because he's a man.

>>59917583
>I don't know why /g/ is so triggered by this.
You do.

>>59917600
>tiny part of female population
>now representative of women in general
>also, autism equals programmer
So much wrong..

>>59916106
>attention whores are worse at coding
No shit.

>>59917613
>The point was that she couldn't even figure out what was she doing wrong when she typed cd.. and didn't go up one level.
I think you are projecting. I easily slip the space when I'm typing or type the wrong directory name and automatically type ls afterwards.

File: female (male).png (591KB, 402x710px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 402x710px

>>59916274
>they/them
That's a man. Pic related.

>>59916106
https://heatst.com/culture-wars/bbc-finally-admits-its-famous-women-write-better-code-story-was-fake-news/
kill yourself
kill yourselfkill yourselfkill yourselfkill yourself
kill yourself
kill yourself
kill yourself

Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be made for them by rational men of intelligence. If women continue to have rights, they will only hinder the advancement of the human race by breeding with degenerate men and creating stupid, degenerate offspring. This will cause humanity to become even more depraved with each generation. Women have more power in human society than they deserve, all because of sex. There is no creature more evil and depraved than the human female. Women are like a plague. They don’t deserve to have any rights. Their wickedness must be contained in order prevent future generations from falling to degeneracy. Women are vicious, evil, barbaric animals, and they need to be treated as such.

>>59917653
Nah, just explaining to you why /g/ is triggered about it. You said you didn't know.

And the reason behind people thinking she couldn't figure out what was she doing wrong are, again, not projecting, they just dislike her and most likely find her stupid. She's a female model, the base assumption is that she has to be stupid.

>>59917751
I don't understand why advocating to get more women into STEM fields can be so aggravating to /g/. I mean, /g/ is literally being triggered by 10-14 year old school girls and one falming supermodel here.

>>59917751
You know what would be really pathetic in real life? Passing minutes, hours, on an anonymous online imageboard dedicated to discussing technology for the only purpose of baiting, thinking you "broke those nerds" and you "trolled" them. Let's make this clear for you:
>he is a troll
>on the internet
>he does it for free
>he will never get a real job
>he will never get real friends
>he will never have a girlfriend

>>59917778
Easy: They feel threatened.

Not because they fear competition, but because their sense of accomplishment is heavily reduced when even 10 year old schoolgirls can do what they take pride in doing.

So they lash out with misogynic memes, hoping to scare them away.

>>59917794

Not that guy, but I'm a dedicated troll with a full time job and a family of 6. It really doesn't take a lot of time or effort to piss nerds off on the internet.

>>59916106
but u can't assign "better coder" to "women"

>>59917818
This. All you have to do is post a link to a BBC article and you'll have fun for hours.

>>59917821
"Woman" isn't immutable, you transphobic fuck.

t. gender fluid

File: 1305741743001.png (136KB, 428x510px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 428x510px

>women are better musicians yet all the greatest music in history is made by men
>women are better painters yet all the masterpiece painting were made by men
>women are better at fashion yet gay men are the source of the greatest fashion pieces
>women are better at [insert job here] yet all visible accomplishments and works of art from [insert job here] come from men

KEK

>>59917778
Not sure, my guess is that they feel like the part of the "nerds" club and having someone posing as part of the club such as Klossy is sort of a "you're not one of ours, fuck off" feeling.

Don't know man. No cute females allowed.

At least Klossy does more than feminists do for getting women into STEM fields. She has a right idea, little girls may look up to her. I'm generally annoyed by American women doing women studies and complaining about how there's not enough women in STEM fields.

>>59917861
tl;dr the glass ceiling is real

>>59917865
>I'm generally annoyed by American women doing women studies and complaining about how there's not enough women in STEM fields.
I agree.

>>59917818
>family of 6
>none of the kids are his

>>59917875
>implying I meant kids at all and wasn't simply referring to my cult followers and hippie collective as "my family"

>>59917875
Of course they're not, they're his brothers and sisters. And by full time job he meant he goes to school.

This is the official /g/ ranking of programming skill by group:

1. Male programmer (while crossdressing)
2. Female (male) programmer
3. Female programmer
4. Regular male programmer

woman haters BTFO

>my goto senpia is a woman
>she has a completely different perspective on issues than most of the people I work with
>in her case she's more practical than theoretical, and it shows

Everyone is different. What sex they are is irrelevant in a lot of cases.
>most people would get their ass kicked by a female mma fighter
>makes you think
>how retarded woman haters actually are

>>59916124
lmao

>>59917866
tl;dr no matter how much pc culture screams there is no difference between races and genders, there are clear ones.

>>59917898
>brothers and sisters
>all fathered by different men

>>59917934
>most people would get their ass kicked by a female mma fighter
Most men would reach her level with ease in half the time considering male biology comes with higher physical threshold and much higher muscle mas building speed;
so your statement is down the drain.

>>59917821
But you can assign "Anime profile picture" to "this person is a woman" though, just like these researchers.

File: who ate wally.jpg (498KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 1024x768px

xer pgoramming langauge be wordpress

>>59916122
female mma fighter would totally kick your ass

Law of averages. There are about 50% of women who do C or ASM better than you.
>let that sink in

Also C and ASM snob. You probably rewire your house every time you want to turn on a light.
>rest of the non-retarded population use a light switch

ok

File: 1306789308910.jpg (117KB, 352x259px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 352x259px

>women have better handwriting than men, yet men are still the source of the greatest literary and philosophical works in history with women barely having any

>>59918027
they were oppressed :^)

>>59917957
>Most men would reach her level with ease in half the time considering male biology comes with higher physical threshold and much higher muscle mas building speed;
so your statement is down the drain.

IF most men do this, and IF most men do that, THEN I can prove you wrong.
>IF, IF, IF

You live in an imaginary reality m8. You literally have to change reality to fit your idea of it.

>>59918037
They were oppressed by low IQ.
Nature is truly a misogynist.

>>59918045
If nature is misogynist why does it pretty much guarantee reproduction for all females?

File: 1306801896645.jpg (11KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 251x251px

>>59918044
No.
I only need to point out that it took a single MTF tranny to wreck havoc with the female MMA league.

>>59918027
>better handwriting
>yet
>greatest literary and philosophical works in history
Was that supposed to be a joke? Because it doesn't make sense in any other context.

>>59918057
Because someone needs to clean the world and work in the kitchen anon.

>>59918064
>women are only better in coding in that they know how to make neat-looking code
>but when it comes to creating shit that drives technology and society, it's fucking nothing

>>59917943
>no matter how much pc culture screams there is no difference between races and genders, there are clear ones.
Yes. Clear differences that are strongly hinting toward men being obsolete in most areas of modern society, so I'd keep that under your hat if I were you famburger. Want someone to dig a ditch? Hire a man. Want someone to use their head, or to get along with other people without every interaction being tainted by testosterone poisoning? You know what to do.

File: ay95895977ada-lovelace-engl.jpg (840KB, 2205x2400px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 2205x2400px

>tfw when'st you realize the gratest programmer was a woman

>>59918086
>men being obsolete in most areas of modern society
I am so sorry anon

File: girls programming II.jpg (466KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1024x768px

>>59917991
post tits or get the sandwich

File: revupthosegoddamnfuckingfryers.png (961KB, 495x996px) Image search: [Google]

961KB, 495x996px

>>59916122
>Why aren't women putting out any C or ASM code?

Because they are largely smart enough to not waste their time on a language that is cryptic, outdated and have limited application today.

Keep on wanking to your cyberskillz while the rest of us will continue with the vastly improved C# and the plethora of other great object-oriented languages in use today.

>>59917969
does anyone still have the meme of the fat one that said ALWAYS FULL?

>>59918091
>and she stood for everything feminists hate today - being obsessed with being feminine and cultured

It's a fucking laugh when even the women who should be giving pride to feminists wouldn't even bother with them if they lived today.

>>59917969
one of them are using tablet for "programming"?

>>59916122
>So why aren't there any women putting out any C or ASM code?
Protip: There is. Programmers at NASA were almost all-female back when programming was just glorified typewriting.

Protip 2: C and ASM are considered old, dumb, outdated, a timesink and a retard activity by everyone else than C and ASM programmers.

>>59918083
Alright then, it's just that >yet that made it seem like you're implying that handwriting somehow has something to do with good writing.

>they know how to make neat-looking code
Citation needed though

>>59918140
You can copy from Stack Overflow with a tablet as well, it's not an issue.

File: mis_costados.png (173KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 640x400px

>>59918102
>muh stronk wymyn empowerment
>muh healthy at all sizes
>airbrushed to hell and back to hide imperfections
oh, the irony

>>59918060
Your logical reasoning is retarded.

you literally have to cling onto the extreme examples to confirm your beliefs. New evidence or logical reasoning won't change your mind.


Someone trained to do something is usually better at doing that than someone who isn't.
>women can be better coders
>women can be better fighters

It's retarded to ignore reality and rely on simplified generalizations based on sex.
>majority of men can't beat a woman mma fighter
>only a woman hating retard would argue with it

>>59918146
Just like with handwriting, most women are obsessed with making everything look neat and ordered. I honestly think this autism needs to stop. It has brought me frustrations from the females around me throughout my life.

>>59918102
at least she's proficient with PS though. look how well looks her camel toe

>>59918164
My logical reasoning is based on biology and the fact that potential is all that matters, and not the current state of a person.
A woman can be good at something momentarily,
but if a man decides to surpass her, she has no chance against him.

This is the upper physical threshold limit of men (their full physical potential when squeezed out and trained):
[=====================================]

This is the upper physical threshold limit of women (their full physical potential when squeezed out and trained):
[===================]

This is the speed of inherent male physical advancement when being trained:
[=====================================]


This is the speed of inherent male physical advancement when being trained:
[===================]

You are dumb if you can't comprehend this little fact in life.
Potential is what's relevant.
If a woman beat me today in MMA, and thus motivated me to get back at her, she would stand no chance against me in the future and she would never be able to match my velocity of advancement.

This is not an IF. It's a biological fact.

>>59917991
I don't really understand any of your post. So 50% of all women know and c better than me? Half the women in the world?
Also what's the lightswitch analogy supposed to mean? Something something I'm afraid of compiling?

>>59917969
Why are these women and cow basically naked

>>59916124
look at this one guys?

Please, guys don't turn into a brainless sheep like this one.

>>59916124
>getting along
FUCK OFF REEEEEEEEEEEE NORMIEEEEEEEEEEEE

Programming is a one MAN task

>>59918210
You need to go take a reading comprehension examination.

He said 50% of women who program in C/asm are better than you on a bell curve, with the greater degrees of superiority being less likely.

File: hover hand not.jpg (101KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 540x720px

>>59918226
because object paradigm

>>59918250
>He said 50% of women who program in C/asm are better than you on a bell curve, with the greater degrees of superiority being less likely.
No, he didn't say any of that actually:
>There are about 50% of women who do C or ASM better than you.

>>59918269
You do know that pic is fake, right

Stallman is my wizard rolemodel

>>59916124
Men and women are both fucked

The only solution is autism

Seriously idk if I'm actually autistic, almost certainly not, but I have chosen to view the world as logically as possible and it really does work. The thing is actually understanding logic and how odd it can be. Ultimately there are no grey areas, this is something I realized awhile ago. Literally, every possible situation there are a number of ways it can go, and how you behave chooses what timeline you go into. In general it seems the education to fully understand and realize that way of looking at things, also takes care of how you behave. If you're uneducated and ignorant, you will behave however you like at the moment. If you really put time into understanding what in reality you can control and what you cannot then you begin to have much more control over life, and you will behave however is best suited to whatever your goal is, not just the moment.

The problem is, both men and women in general suck at this. Normies generally have some vague attempt in its direction but because they are only paying attention to feelings not logic, they end up becoming the sort of libs that want no borders because look at these really sad photos. A lot of people here on /g/ get too caught up in consumerism and pseudo intellectualism and really are pretty much fedora stereotypes, except instead of wearing fedoras you complain about them. Even in academia it's still clear that not everyone gets it.

Idk I just feel like one day I woke up and realized I had absolutely no problem in the world and never would really if I simply approached things logically instead of giving into emotions. When I started doing things this way, I found the world suddenly so simple. As life happens around me, I simply search for where I have control, use it if it helps future goals, and that's about it. Of course I'm still human and have needs as well.

Biggest doubt to this is I still know all too well
>tfw no gf

>>59918323
>You do know that pic is fake, right
Yes

>Stallman is my wizard rolemodel
Not exactly. Stallman has a very liberal sexuality. Among other things, he has been in a relationship for years with a women that is cucking her husband with Stallman and other men. He's also quite open about having participated in an orgie in his younger days.

You should really read his blog.

>>59918353
was it an open source orgy?

>>59918164
>It's retarded to ignore reality
You could listen to your own advice, because it's a reality that it would be easy for men to dominate in the female leagues,
but no woman could ever go past the middle tier in male leagues.

>>59918271
It's implied by the fact that he mentioned the law of averages, which you are clearly ignorant of.

File: roll-over-image-to-zoom-in-pink-striped-programming-socks-14149451[1].png (52KB, 500x510px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x510px

Did they adjust for the presence or absence of striped programming socks?

>>59916124
>a world that requires getting along with others and functioning as a community, women are more optimal

Good joke. Yes, men are less social than women, yet they are 1000x better at working together. Go find someone working in an all female office and listen to the horror storries. I know a girl who works with female colleagues only, and the drama and constant backstabbing is off the charts. And they aren't dumb, they all have PhDs, yet they spend most of their time on turf wars.

>>59918392
You're not addressing my point. I do know the law of averages, but it doesn't imply any population. So why should I assume he meant 50% of all women programmers when he said 50% of all women?

Once you've fucked enough women you realize they are all fucking stupid and irrational.
You literally have to be a virgin and/or Cuck to think otherwise. No meme. It's laughable to think women are equal to men in any way. Considering most of you fa/g/s have never spoken to women outside of your family, I'm not surprised though. I've transcended the gf/wife meme and rely solely on one night stands or prostitues. Free yourselves, lads.

>>59916106
>(((Github)))
>representative of actual work

>>59918450
>All stupid
Well no, there are very intelligent women out there.

>Irrational
This is more the point, I'd hire a slightly less intelligent but far less histrionic man over a woman technically more qualified.

>not peer reviewed
>Non random sample
>Based entirely on pull requests
>Gender determined by cross referencing with online accounts
>2% bias shown
Fucking dropped

File: Autism-Women-Percentage.jpg (30KB, 582x332px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 582x332px

>>59918330
i understand your argument. men still will win though. pic related.
not even trolling. i'm not the best programmer, even i consider myself a pretty good one. i recognise myself as having some trace of characteristics related to autism, asperger, or whatever the name they want to use tomorrow.
>>59918201
your reasoning is slightly wrong, i'm tell you where:
the point is not that you could win ANY woman. maybe there's a whale who can lift 300kg, and you will never be able to, even after training 10 years.
there are this things called "bell curves". when considered as a whole, we can be 100% sure that MOST of the men have more physical strength and speed than MOST of the woman.
after more than 70k years of specialization in either hunting, building and fighting, or keeping the cave clean, watering plants and caring babys, male and female brains resulted in having very different aptitudes.
there's no "better", each one was necessary for succesfull evolution. the misunderstanding of feminism is wanting to have what they never will, and not making use of what they already have.
males can not give birth, even we'll never (well, almost in any case except mental illness) consider ourselves "inferior" due that fact

>>59918142
>>59918120
0.001$ have been deposed on your account by Soro$

>>59918120
>cryptic, outdated and have limited application

Oh dear, it's retarded.

>>59918534
>the point is not that you could win ANY woman. maybe there's a whale who can lift 300kg, and you will never be able to, even after training 10 years.
A female whale and a male whale will still see the male winning because he doesn't only have fat, he also has muscle advantage.
It's still the same shit bubba. You are just adding weight that anyone can add, to a base formula where the man still leads.

You can't argue against potential.
You simply can not. This whole discussion started out with you attempting to put women in an advantage by giving them handicaps while leaving the competition (me for example) in the original state for the purpose of winning an argument.
As soon as i equalized the labels (i'm no longer an average dude now, but equally an MMA fighter as her), the women get blasted into shit.

This is the whole thing about potential.
A woman will never overcome a certain barrier, which ALL men will break easily because their barrier is farther along the road.

Now you are shifting the topic into the mental area from the topic on physical prowess.
That's the only topic where we can agree that gender biology has no impact on.

>>59916318
Woman do not have penises lol.

>>59918534
Kys, you don't even know how to write a correct sentence.

>>59918627
F e m i n i n e
P e n i s

>>59918534
If you compare a man and a woman lifting weights, both people having exactly 300kg;
the man's weight will have a bigger muscle mass and less fat mass, while the woman will be opposite.
Even under stress of our own weight, our muscles grow more than females to compensate.

A situation where a female and a male have the same weight and yet the same exact muscle/fat ratio, simply doesn't exist.

Women = shit

you´re welcome

>>59918625
you didn't understand shit. our strength and intelligence(*) is determined by genes. humans are born with different limited potential.
big women will ever beat some other small men, even after training.
(*) some sjw will oppose the last

>>59918638
yes, i've made some grammatical mistakes. my English is not the best. does that invalid my argument?

>>59917928
How does being a faggot makes you a better programmer?

>>59918625
also
>This whole discussion started out with you
i'm not OP

>>59918705
Yes, because you're a peanut brained street shitter.
You're so painfully stupid, yet as you say, it's in your genes.

File: canadians laughing.jpg (39KB, 499x449px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 499x449px

>>59918718
>what is a fallacy
still waiting

programming requires high intelligence, ability to think logically, exposure to "high intelligence communities", all fast tracks to mental illness for an ill-prepared mind; trannies not going anywhere soon!

>>59918736
>can't speak English (even remotely well)
>thinks women are stronger than men
>fallacy
Nice try, Raja

>>59916106
how did they find out they're women?

>>59918602
If you aren't programming for embedded hardware you should not be writing C

>>59918767
t. brainlet

>>59918749
That's not what he said at all. L2read.

>>59918767
t. brainlet JavaScript dev

>>59918645
"Aren't girls with peepees just boys ?" - Mom

desu the best programmer on my faculty was female(real female, not american like with dick)
She is into machine learning, she was so much better then the rest

>>59918534
>keeping the cave clean

>>59918697
>big women will ever beat some other small men, even after training.
They won't.
You literally have to induce non-natural effects such as drugs and electrical stimulation in order to give women some form of physical competition with men, and they will still fail in the majority of cases.

There's individual genetics, and there's gender genetics, when it comes to physical traits.
Don't mix them up, the gender genetics of men win over women. This is a fact of life in the Human species.
Even the scrawniest of male faggots who has a hormonal deficiency will see his whole system fixed with a few months of training, his body hair will suddenly blossom, his muscle gains will increase at a constant rate until his original biological threshold is reached (which is farther away from any women), and he will break through a muscle mass point which is impossible for women to break through.

Even the fucking skeletal differences between men and women are set and judge physical potential:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Skeletal+differences+men+women


Go and learn something you daft cunt.
Individualism applies in some areas, and it doesn't in others. Someone who blindly believes in individualism when it comes to biology, only shows that they don't know shit about biology.

>>59918904
>will still fail in the majority of cases
>majority of cases
>not in all cases
and that's exactly what i've told
>some other small men
>some

>>59917461
This is a legitimate point. They also say but only if... implying they have proper research of cases where they were indentifiable.

This whole thing is just clickbait bullshit

>best women programmers have a penis
that's nothing new

>>59918987
Yes, you've told that you need to give women handicaps to win over a man who doesn't have the same.
What you failed to notice in my post is that if the same stimuli in electrical stimulation and drugs were given to men as well as women, women would lose in ALL cases.

This is what potential is, you dumbass.
Even in the case of height, a man will still fuck up a woman because of muscles and explosive power.
Even in the case of equalizing weight, a man will have more muscle power and less body fat than a woman.

Here's the deal anon: I know what i know and what i don't know.
I can confidently say that in terms of software and programming, you are my better, and i have my reasons for saying this.

But don't argue biology with me unless you have gone through 50 books, and re-read your dusty high-school biology books at least 10 times.
Don't mix philosophy and socio-political faggotry with fucking science.

>>59919086
may be you read a lot, but still fail at text comprehension.
me:
>the point is not that you could win ANY woman. maybe there's a whale who can lift 300kg, and you will never be able to, even after training 10 years.
you:
>A female whale and a male whale will still see the male winning because he doesn't only have fat, he also has muscle advantage.
It's still the same shit bubba. You are just adding weight that anyone can add, to a base formula where the man still leads.

i wasn't talking about male/female with same mass. please read again, this time paying due attention, and come back when ready

>>59919311
I understand that you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
The fact that men have biological advantage over women in physical capability and potential is a fact that can't be disputed. Gender differences care not for individualism.
Not even by inventing imaginary scenarios.
That's something you should comprehend.

>>59916106
> British scientists

Oh my...

>>59916318
this cheap ass bait

at least you tried, sno

>>59918353
Stallman is alpha af

>>59917806
Or people just don't like shit that shows up where it doesn't belong. There's no problem with women programming, but there is with societies focus on women programming. The anons that reply to these stupid threads are just as mad at that funny banana being posted because for a while it found its way into everything. But please, continue to make assumption about an amorphous blob on the internet in an attempt to offend said amorphous blob.

File: WUMANS.jpg (299KB, 1400x814px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1400x814px

>>59916106

If you work in Silicon Valley or SanFran you might want to consider becoming trans if you want to actually advance your career in the next ten years.

lol sure

>>59916106
>Aprproval ratings

>>59916318
I chuckled

>>59918534
It is funny that you're trying to use reason in motherfucking 4chan.

>>59921357
Chad should go for Samantha, her being dumb wont hurt the relationship.

To make it fair they should try coding with 1 hand and pornhub open in another tab

>>59916124
>tonight on things that aren't the case

>>59916106
>write overly simple shit
>surprised that it gets accepted more often
wow call the news, oh wait.

>>59916139
Not an argument.

>>59916124
>or people behaving in the "woman" gender role
(You)

File: female github study.png (155KB, 987x868px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 987x868px

>>59916106
>http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35559439

Debunked shortly after the story emerged. Pic related.

>>59916124
You realize that the only reason women have a longer average life expectancy is because guys generally perform far more dangerous jobs right?

>>59918135
is that by any chance chicken soup?

>>59916106
When you make this bold testament you really have to show conviction.
>Like - women are better coders.
>Give me Tesla with autopilot coded only by women so there will be proof they code better
>Car crash and die

Something in that order.

>>59916106
I mean, who gives a shit? let them code then? I am confused why this even matters a little bit.

>>59924947
This matters a fuckload because companies are hiring women over men simply due to their genitals instead of only looking at qualifications and interview results as they should, and they're trying to use any shred of un-evidence they can to justify this behavior after the fact in order to get a defense against sexism suites.

Moreover, in large companies. there are dedicated groups whose mission is to push this garbage company wide. Board members and heads in general typically don't know shit about what they're lording over, so any kind of pseudoscience which might suggest bonus profit for them, they will cling to.

yes that is an article from over a year ago baiting nearly 100 people, sage

>>59916876
M.U.L.E. but that was written by Burger Becky who is a tranny.

However there are some good female coders, Lorinda Cherry of Bell Labs wrote quite a bit of code for Unix.

>>59917613
That's not because she's a woman, it's because she's a millennial.

Millennials simply can't into computers, its fucking pathetic.

>>59925157
So they get hired more easily (supposedly) but then make less money for doing the same job? Interesting trade-off.

>>59916174
Who hurt you m8

>>59925845
They don't.

>>59925654
Yeah those 37 year olds are just shit at computers.

What are you even doing on 4chan old man?

>Ratings for women fell if they were not regulars on the service and were identified by their gender, suggesting a bias in that community.
I'm guessing ratings fell for men who also weren't regulars... People who contribute more are probably more likely to make better commits.

Also note the use of "suggesting." For starters, they probably don't know whether users actually checked the gender of the person making the pull request, and I'm guessing in most cases, they did not actually view their profile. They probably glanced at the username and that is all. If so, the fact they identify in their profile may as well be irrelevant.

>The team found that 78.6% of pull requests made by women were accepted compared with 74.6% of those by men.
They used information from a single day, April 1st. A 4% difference could be statistical noise. Maybe on April 2nd those numbers were flipped.

"At the Gitburger restaurant on April 1st, male customers tipped 4 cents more than female customers."
Headline: "New research shows that men tip more than women."

>The researchers considered various factors, such as whether women were more likely to be responding to known issues, whether their contributions were shorter in length and so easier to appraise, and which programming language they were using, but they could not find a correlation.
All of these are very complicated to analyze, so I'd be curious how they reach any conclusion here. Just as a case in point, in programming the length of a code change has almost nothing to do with how easy it is to appraise. I can commit a 5,000 line readme that will be approved instantly because no one cares about a readme, but changing a few lines of SQL could be much harder to appraise...

>>59917369

>so did it get reviewed

You submit your paper to a journal, if it is not shit it gets reviewed and published.

This one must be especially bad if it never got published in a peer reviewed journal. It checks off all tje popular check marks right now and should be a shoe in.

>>59925862
Observing shit threads from children.

>>59916106
So where can I find one of these elite programming qts to be my gf?

File: 1380831482350.jpg (30KB, 957x626px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 957x626px

>>59918102
>do while loop

>>59916106
Old shitty bait that was posted before.
Good job getting all those misogynists to reply, though.

File: hypocritical idiot.jpg (112KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 600x600px

>>59927379
Misandry at its finest.

File: 11399834_10206943852140095_1046271378_n.gif (929KB, 352x264px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 352x264px

>>59916106
>Women = better coders
>Men = better programers
We can all agree on this, right?

>>59918515
This.
/thread

cd code
cd..
cd..
cd..
cd ..
ls
cd code
cd ..
cd

#kodewithkarlie

>>59918057
Easy reproduction means less selection.

>Reposting this garbage

http://slatestarcodex.com/2016/02/12/before-you-get-too-excited-about-that-github-study/

>>59917653
Ok fine but why would you take a pic of that when you want people to see the cool things you are doing in the term?

File: raid support.jpg (611KB, 1440x1500px) Image search: [Google]

611KB, 1440x1500px

>>59926232
>April 1st
now all makes sense

>>59916106

>New research shows that software coding changes suggested by women had higher approval ratings than those from men - but only if their gender was not identifiable.

Coding changes? So like a non trivial patch? Or a suggestion to use gender neutral pronouns in the comments?

>>59916106
95% of coders are men

/thread

She has no ass at all.

On the plus side she looks like a kitty.

>>59928232
I've been out of the loop for a while, where is this from and why do I see it in every thread on /g/?

>>59931334
Kill yourself, you fucking retard.

>>59916274
I don't know if we can say that women on average produce better quality code, in fact I'd be surprised if thats true. What it does show is that the women who persevere in tech are incredibly dedicated and probably in the top of the group that could become programmers to begin with.

It takes a really really eccentric woman to like programming WITHOUT any pushes or programs asking her to do it

Meanwhile a fair amount of men are interested in it by default

File: 1492412971709.jpg (14KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 184x184px

>>59929560
she didnt wrote that she was serving coffee to the males.they just put her there for scale like when 9fags use a banana for scale.

Taking a Screenshot to post in YLYL threads on /g