>website has disabled right-click image save

So just go pour through the website source and look for any .jpg, .png, or .gif file extensions until you find the correct image.

>>59912513
just use umatrix, tard.

>>59912540
>disable JavaScript
>website doesn't load

File: smug-1485651374755.png (47KB, 221x288px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 221x288px

view -> page info -> media -> find the image and save it

File: 1491679620789.jpg (22KB, 346x450px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 346x450px

>>59912513
>text is unselectable

ITT: Things that haven't happened in over 10 years

>>59912615
If it's in stackoverflow somewhere, you can be sure that someone will do it.

>>59912513
> right-click
> copy image location
> wget

Wow that was hard.

>>59912513
>website has disabled right-click image save
>press printscreen key
>crop image
??

>>59912513
Thanks o̶b̶a̶m̶a javascript

>>59912815
>website has print screen disabled

File: 1491906689611.png (1MB, 1186x751px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1186x751px

>click menu / nutrition information
>pdf download

>>59912815
It's like the high tech version of ghetto people taking cell phone video of a video on a monitor.

>>59912513
I'd download said picture lurking the source code, then i'd block that shitty website

>>59912615
>Twitter
>Instagram

>>59912860
And on vertical

File: 1491932511297.png (72KB, 555x558px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 555x558px

>>59912513
>middle click disabled
>middle click opens in same tab

>>59912878
>watch friend filming event vertically
>tell him that nobody likes that shit
>he ignores me and continues anyway
retards gonna retard

File: 1492159847359.jpg (44KB, 480x451px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x451px

>classifieds website
>pic of product is a phone screen capture showing a pic of the product opened in the gallery app

>>59912513
>AD twitter tries to do this shit.
>preview images are just the actual image resized with a script.
>right click on the preview
>your nudy pics are now residents of my personal spank bank whether you want it or not.
>there is no image to convey my level of smugness

File: wut-1445909361823.gif (565KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 320x240px

>site uses browser ID string to determine if it should use Flash to play videos
>only looks for IE, FF, Safari, and Chrome version numbers

File: 238.png (272KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 600x583px

>javascript:void(0)

>>59912928
Fucking netflix

File: brain-training-kawashima.jpg (15KB, 250x252px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x252px

>we see you are using adblock

File: seamonkey.png (31KB, 300x236px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x236px

>>59912969
It's ustream for me, but at least
>video ads are loaded via a .swf module
>adblock the .swf

>>59913003
how you lose a viewer

after im done blocking the message, anti view shit and read the article like I originally intended, of course

>start reading article
>unrelated news clip start playing at the bottom/side

>subscription site
>puts its gibs me monis window on top of the page and grays out the rest of the page
>turn off CSS styles and read article

File: 1487975966117.gif (1MB, 337x221px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 337x221px

>reading article
>internal popup appears
>do you want to subscribe to receive updates in your mailbox?
>like us on Facebook

>You are banned:
>Replying on a raid thread
>you can't appeal

File: 1492279789469.png (23KB, 212x172px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 212x172px

>website is a social media
Why do people post their name, address, phone numbers and photos of themselves on the internet?
Don't they know there are strangers on the internet?

>>59912627
Except browsers don't allow it anymore, moron.

>>59912607
Text is selectable but when you copy it, it will auto insert some tracking urls ads.

>>59912876
Twitter has it, you just do it from the timeline instead of the tweet. And don't forget to add :orig

>>59912846
>Put fullscreen browser page on second monitor
>Change focus to desktop or fucking anything other than browser
>Prtscn
>Crop
hurr

>>59912860
kek

>>59912886
man why the fuck does xhamster do this

>>59912513
View page information or set dom.event.contextmenu.enabled to false.

>>59912565
Thank you chum lee

>sign up to receive my weekly "10 feminist tips" newsletter
[x] Yes- I want to receive your newsletter
[x] No - Check your privilege, bigot

File: 1409599102560.png (153KB, 289x277px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 289x277px

>>59912513
>Flash required

this is such stupid shit, and it's also annoying when you can't save twitter images because it opens that dumb gallery viewer thing

File: C1nEbIAVQAEbb8T.jpg (177KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1200x900px

>>59913583
>>59913386

You can save them, pic related

>>59912860
underrated post

>>59913132

window.oncontextmenu = () => false;

what now

>>59912539
this. if right click being disabled stymies you, you shouldn't be on /g/.

>>59912513
stop creeping on little boys' facebooks

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-15 at 8.04.49 PM.png (211KB, 496x250px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 496x250px

>>59913906
facebook doesn't even block it (or if it does, any number of random totally unrelated extensions blocks that).

and downloading photos of people from facebook is trivial. there are tons of extensions and shit.

>>59912876
You can do it on twitter

>>59912615
twatter disables right click.

>>59913793
browsers override it, no matter how hard you try, the browser always has full control of the data.

>>59913924
NSA has your boipucci folder mother fucker

>>59914039
ok

look i'm not keen on it but what do you want me to do? have a panic attack? i'm sorry, i'm not autistic.

>>59913963
like i said earlier, if inspecting DOM elements is too advanced for you, you shouldn't be on /g/.

File: rage 1450620620361.png (139KB, 424x470px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 424x470px

>want to save an image
>right click save doesn't work
>go into media image list for page
>image is broken up into dozens of little chunks

File: 1445613092849.jpg (47KB, 464x507px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 464x507px

>site disables the back button

>>59912815
Or just use snipping tool.

>>59912565
>view -> page info
tools -> page info in FF

>>59914597
when sites mess with back and (more often) with scrolling (often just the space bar, but sometimes they fuck with everything), i tend to just close the tab. if i see more of it in the coming year, i might take to finding the contact info of someone at the site and just emailing something like "your site breaks scrolling which is incredibly obnoxious, so i stopped browsing it. just an FYI".

site operators are looking for ways to increase the number of eyeballs on their sites and keep them there longer. if someone ever emailed me to tell me precisely why they stopped browsing one of my sites, of course i'd fucking act on it. i have google analytics and all that shit for that specific purpose.

>website disables right click
>press menu key
>menu comes up

>web site has useless toolbar
>toolbar is sticky at top of screen to keep web site's BRANDtm(R) logo on screen
>needs custom scrolling code to handle the difference in page height below useless distracting toolbar

>>59912513
>using social media
stay cucked pleb

>>59912846
How can a website running inside of a sandboxed browser engine can disable an OS wide feature ?

>>59914902
don't ask windows users. they're literally this incompetent

>>59912513
>press command+shift+4
>take a screenshot of just the picture you need

just works :^)

File: 1491930881731.jpg (351KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 1200x900px

>He doesn't just open snipping tool.

>>59912539
Unfortunately, most websites use non free JavaScript now.

>>59912513
dom.event.contextmenu.enabled => false
Firefox still the best.

>>59912513
*Opens snipping tool*

>>59912539
this is fucking retarded when you have the network tab

>>59914452
>images are drawn with <canvas>
>They're made from 4 rapidly flashing frames with ghosting

File: 1433022722568.jpg (120KB, 456x337px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 456x337px

>people posting websites annoyances
>a faggot appears it can be fixed using a plugin, or messing up with the DOM, CSS or custom URLs

>tap a link on mobile
>we have an app for your mobile
>install it
>its an ad infested mess

>>59912876
>>59913386
Are you retarded? What ass browser are you using?

File: 4_tall_women_by_lowerrider-d8c7nne.jpg (114KB, 1024x727px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1024x727px

>>59916195
NotChrome(tm)

File: autism.png (894KB, 1670x1038px) Image search: [Google]

894KB, 1670x1038px

>>59916206
So retarded, then.

File: 6asHuP1.png (476KB, 633x620px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 633x620px

>>59914651
This happened to an employer. Someone wrote a message about how horrible their website's search engine was because it required two input boxes keywords and geographic location to conduct a search. This was made even worse by the fact that a geographic location would not even register unless it was selected from a Google location autocomplete dropdown plugin, and no other way, even if you typed it exactly the way that the plugin provided. Also mentioned were several other features that other sites had or got right that were either missing or broken on this one. The writer said that they were never going to visit the site again because the experience was so bad.

So what does the employer do in response? They publish the writer's message publicly with the simple tip that, in order to search, both boxes need to be filled out.

>>59915873
is there a good snipping tool alternative for liunx? google got me nothing

File: 1486092887931.png (247KB, 497x538px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 497x538px

>>59916232
I see your Edge tabs behind, nigger

>>59916281
I remember print screen directly shows a tool in gnome

>>59916307
It's opera dumb ass. kys

File: 1486883464202.jpg (31KB, 620x470px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 620x470px

>>59916323

>>59912615
You don't know internet.

>>59912800
Retard

>>59912513

>open snippit tool
>save

>>59912513
>not having your screengrab hotkey memorized
windows user?

>>59912513
Use Right to Click you fucking retards.

File: IMG_3580.jpg (120KB, 413x310px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 413x310px

>didn't delete history before other family member opens a new tab displaying frequently visited sites

>>59916281
I made a script to do this, although I don't have the .desktop file on me at the moment so you'll have to figure that one out yourself. Works for GNOME 3 and XFCE. Opens it in Pinta for copy and paste or further editing.

if [[ "${DESKTOP_SESSION}" == "gnome" ]]; then
  tmpfile="$(mktemp --suffix='.png' -p /dev/shm/)"
  gnome-screenshot --area --file="${tmpfile}"
  pinta "${tmpfile}"
  rm -f "${tmpfile}"
elif [[ "${DESKTOP_SESSION}" == "xfce" ]]; then
  xfce4-screenshooter --region --open pinta
fi

File: 1491680724767.png (96KB, 556x430px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 556x430px

>website loads for a split second
>suddenly overlay appears, greying website out and telling you to log in
(no, right clicking and deleting node doesn't help much because it doesn't load all content)

>>59916307
You're able to recognize a edge tab?

>>59916281
scrot

>Move cursor to tabs to close tab
>NO! DON'T LEAVE JUST YET! PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER!

This is what taught me the wonders of CTRL+W.

>He doesn't use Right-to-Click addon

File: furrrrby.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>59912513
>customized mouse pointer

>>59913003
Why don't they just display an ad instead of "We see you're using adblock"?

>>59918381
This.

>>59913128
Exactly my thoughts. When I was a kid and when we first got our internet in 2001 I remember my parents always telling me to never share any personal information with people on the internet. I don't know why everyone is so eager to share everything nowadays.

>try to highlight some text
>JavaScript pop-up says "YOU ARE COMMITTING PLAGIARISM"

File: twit-paper.jpg (29KB, 468x369px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 468x369px

>they have onhover menus
>they also have sharethis enabled
>move mouse across web page to click on something
>suddenly PANEL FULL OF SOCIAL MEDIA FILTH ICONS
"Share" links are fucking cancer. So are onhover menus. Both together are cancer squared.

>>59916269
>So what does the employer do in response? They publish the writer's message publicly with the simple tip that, in order to search, both boxes need to be filled out.
What did they do about the wooshing sound that played every time someone read those instructions?

>>59918065
>No, Fakebook, I still do not want a fucking account and get that crap out of my face.
>Ditto for you pee-interest.

>>59919077
>they have onhover menus
>they also have sharethis enabled
>move mouse across web page to click on something
>nothing happens because I use uBlock
stand aside, peasant

>>59919077
>if you're still seeing social media buttons with your adblock on then you're a filthy pleb and deserve it

>>59912539
or you know just snip it to save time

>disable scripts
>nothing works, the page doesn't even show
back to search results we go

This wouldnt happen if we didnt have thousands of pajeets, Ukranians and Chinese that try to copy your entire website.

Even if you pay for original works online you get pajeets that try to sell you stuff they found on Google.

>>59916140

facebook
>have a mobile website that works including messaging
>make a full mobile app that despite being 300MB and eating battery at least kind of works including messaging
>make another 300MB app eating even more battery specifically for messaging
>remove messaging from mobile site
>remove messaging from your other dedicated app

>why is everyone moving away from facebook, how could this happen

reddit
>have broken desktop website
>have even more broken mobile website
>only way to use it is 3rd party app
>make a new mobile website which is even more broken than the old one, random errors 50% of clicks
>make your own mobile app, also broken as fuck

>why is nobody using our mobile app
>I have just the solution
>when someone opens an image on the mible website popup a NON-CLOSABLE overlay link to the play store

>>59919315
Annoying as fuck
Will never install Facebook again

>>59912513
I lol when sites do this shit. Like i cant just open up snipping tool and screen cap the fucking images of the girl im stalking and masterbate to it at my own leisure anyway.

>>59919343
I only ever had the FB app but when they removed messaging I uninstalled it. I still have an account but I only log in maybe once a week, or every other week. Facebook finally did become the new myspace

>>59919198
Don't worry, I blocked them ten (?) years ago when they first appeared. They may even have been what got me really serious about using an ad blocker instead of just "disable images from this site".

Share links and onhover menus are still cancer, though.

>>59919077
>>59919077
>>No, Fakebook, I still do not want a fucking account and get that crap out of my face.
>>Ditto for you pee-interest.

... and LinkedIn.

Real nice "professional" networking site to require logging in just to view any other page than the start page.

I don't have an account and only use iit to verify that I'm emailing etc. the right people. But nope, NOT ALLOWED

>>59919542
it also will ask you tons of times if you want to invite your entire mailing list of people you ever emailed to use linkedin. but they phrase it like "do you want to linkedin to find contacts you may now?" or something

>>59912907
>imageboard website
>pic of meme is a phone screen capture showing a pic of the funny picture opened in the browser

>>59912539
>>59915964
>>59919254
>>59912565
>>59912800
>>59912815
>>59912861
retards
>>59913454
>dom.event.contextmenu.enabled
THIS

>>59913035
if their goal was to show ads to a bunch of people, they already lost viewers when they block the ads.

>>59919315
>>remove messaging from mobile site
Who the fuck even though of that? Messaging was the only reason of me having a fb account and the site was great. No need for apps or anything and then they force you to download half Gb of shit as Lite is garbage. Fortunately there is Face Slim which seems to conveniently wrap web-based Messenger.

>>59912513
>tampermonkey
>enable right click

File: 4chan-1346362104822.png (75KB, 704x236px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 704x236px

>want to post an image
>drag from desktop onto reply box
>miss the "Browse..." button by a few pixels
>displays the image instead
>hit back button
>your reply is gone, you have to start over

>>59912539
noob way

>>59912815
super noob way

>>59912565
correct way

>need API documentation
>it's in PDF format
>it's encrypted and can only be oped with a web browser, not with stand alone PDF readers.

w....why?

File: duty_calls.png (14KB, 300x330px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x330px

>>59912615
>>59913132
>>59919761
>misunderstanding the point of this thread
Thank you, "Someone is wrong on the Internet"-Man! What would we ever do without you?

>>59912513

SHIFT+right click

easy.

>>59920050
Wait, what? PDF protection can do that? It's bad enough when PDF documentation of an API is set to disallow select/copy of text, but that is pants-on-PHB's-head retarded.

>>59920088
>right click is disabled
>but ctrl-click still works on Mac

>>59920050
Or did you just mean encrypted, and that the standalone readers don't support encryption? "Only view from web plug-in" would be a rather strange option.

So are you implying that Acrobat Reader can't be used as a standalone reader anymore? It isn't just a plug-in, you know.

>>59919886
Lite works fine for me.

>>59920244
That's not the point. The point is they removed an existing feature and then made not one not two but three apps for it

Remember the new app for groups
That's three apps normies need now

Why the fuck do browsers let shitheads do that???????????

>screen capture software that can select areas of the screen
>inspect element
>many third party programs that do this

Right click disabled is nothing more than a minor inconvenience

>looking for answers for cs hw and sites have text and pics burred out for cash but i takes bits that arent to compile a complete answer from multiple sites and this isnt picked up by safeassign

Feels good man

>>59920088
This. Shift + Right-click always works

File: Screenshot_2017-04-16-17-54-19.png (121KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 720x1280px

>>59919731
Let me meta that, senpai

>paying/applying for something
>the whole process works opening a 1px pop up that your browser blocks
>start the process again
>there's an application already uncompleted
>contact the service
>call the place
>the guy complaints about it happening every single time
>he teaches you how to remove ad blocking, and set your security level to none

While we're on the subject, does anybody know how to disable hijacking the scroll wheel on a particular website?

snipping tool

>>59918417

1. Because ads normally need to be served from an ad provider's domain using their javascript, which is what adblockers block, while anti-adblock scripts are served locally.
2. And because if they did show an ad, the relevant adblock lists would add a rule to block it.

>>59913924
Absolutely no fucking hips, holy shit

>>59912513

A Chrome extension easily gets around it

>>59913967
But wait! The W3C implemented a way to deny the user control over the data in a webpage!
https://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/
Thanks Tim Berners-Lee, you really deserved that award!

>>59921879
Pressing shift in firefox gets around this.

>like to preserve image quality with PNG
>Send it
>Compresses it to jpg 65% and resizes
>Have a jpg
>Send it
>Compresses it to jpg 65% and resizes again anyway
>Have gif and send it
>Compresses it but twitter sure as hell makes it LOOK more shit
>No webm support yet
I fucking hate every site that does this shit. Yes saving a compressed copy of the image is better for server related shit but maybe some folks think this is bullshit

>>59920541
Because in some cases it can be useful. People always find ways to abuse any feature and they ruin it for everyone else.

>>59912815
And now the resolution is shit.

>>59914188
No, what you said earlier is no one does these things. You were provided an example of someone doing them.

ctrl i <media tab>

>website has hijacked alt+arrow

you used to be able to reload the image page and it would be able to download it that way

>>59913454
OMG THIS

>>59912615
Its still on an aquarium-forum im browsing after 10 years

>website has disabled print screen

I cant think of any examples off hand, but I know I've seen it before

>>59923505
I am quite certain that you haven't.

>>59923540
This would have been like 10 years ago, and it was very easily circumvented, but it can be done with javascript very easily.

something like
<script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() {
$(window).keyup(function(e){
if(e.keyCode == 44){
$("body").hide();
}

}); });
</script>

but ya as I said it was extremely easy to work around (ie, just select another window and prnt-scrn that with the one you actually want still visible)

https://kilianvalkhof.com/2011/javascript/annoying-js-how-to-be-an-asshole/

>>59923620
no, he's right. it's not possible. javascript can't hijack an operating system control like that.

File: inside-walkthough-part-6-6.jpg (50KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 800x450px

>login with Facebook to enter/comment

>contact support through our twitter account

>all these RETARDS
inspect element > network tab. search for picture you're trying to save. go to it, then ctrl + s.
not that hard.

>>59912565
>view -> page info ->
You mean ctrl i, bro.

>>59912890
>filming videos in any format other than vertical

t. sam hyde

>>59919315
Just install FaceSlim from F-Driod, shit works terrific

>>59926779
Does twitter/instagram have the original versions or jpg?

File: 1467568976695.gif (429KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

429KB, 480x270px

>>59912858
>browser able to view .pdf files perfectly fine
>link still forces the .pdf to download onto the system

>>59918449
Because they are not children

>>59916281
Shutter

>Website makes it a little harder to save an image

>"View full sized image"
>forces download instead of just opening the image in the browser

>>59912890
>friend filming event vertically
>filming event vertically
>friend

>>59930382
>.c/.cpp/.h file
>browser forces it to download because mime type says it's not text/whatever
Fucking autists making mime type lists.
Also, this happens always with the spacebar preview window in OS X Finder. C source code? Fuck you, if it doesn't end in .txt, no preview for you!

inb4 im too lazy
inb4 i use gyazo

>>59912539
What is cmd/ctrl shift c ;^)

>>59930403
>Because they are not children
But a lot of them are kids who aren't even the drinking age.

>>59914610
How do you stop snipping tool from compressing the images to hell

>>59912564
The sign of a bad website

File: 18011510_1755198291421827_4979806965287878656_n.jpg (231KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1080x1080px

>>59919374
If you're talking about instagram, you can get the original resolution image by going to one of those other instagram viewers and copying the image address. I'll use this as an example http://www.pictaram.com/media/1494929003038370069_455481934

Copy the image address, it comes out as

http://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s750x750/sh0.08/e35/18011510_1755198291421827_4979806965287878656_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTQ5NDkyOTAwMzAzODM3MDA2OQ%3D%3D.2

Delete everything between the t51 part and the image id, and the stuff at the end, now it looks like

http://scontent-sea1-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/18011510_1755198291421827_4979806965287878656_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTQ5NDkyOTAwMzAzODM3MDA2OQ%3D%3D.2

I was going to say you also need to delete the stuff after ".jpg" and change the "_n" to "_o" but it seems to work just by deleting the first stuff. Hit enter and it loads a bigger version of the same image and you can masturbate to higher resolution tits

>>59930403
Do you see many "adult" people posting this kind of information in public if we exclude social media?

>>59912876
>>59913963
Run twitter in mobile mode. Right clicking now works, you no longer need an account to view explicit content, and all videos can be saved.

>all these "just screenshot it" replies
/g/ is finished. so long and good luck.

>want to download porn vid
>check web code
>video source is written in chunks by javascript
>copy and paste code into console
>download mp4

No amount of programming will make me feel this 1337. All their efforts are futile under my cheeto fingers.

>>59912565
this this this this this
this this this this this
this this this this this this

File: 1292921061616.jpg (23KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 429x410px

>>59913128
>>59918449
>Idiots posting pics with their home address in view.
>Every photo still has it's EXIF data.
>Phone reports your weekly routine and route via "check-ins" on social media.

It's far too easy to find people now.

>>59935751

How do you do this?

>>59913128
A couple of weeks ago at a thrift store, I found a 300GB PATA hard drive that had PDFs of a few years of someone's income taxes, and his wife's too. He was a Turbo Tax pleb, I use H&R Block's because they're #2 in that market, so they have a reason to suck less.

Like I cared, it was the 250GB of FLACs that was the real score. A few were even 24/96.

>>59935966
View the source code, ctrl+F ".mp4". Click on the link and then save the video. Other websites (pornhub I think?) write the link into the source code using javascript to prevent guests dowloading.

Open the browser's js console, copy the code there and you got the link in a variable.

>>59919077
for share links: Fanboy’s Social Blocking List

File: 1445355142469.gif (489KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 480x360px

>website is completely blank without 30 3rd party javascripts enabled
nothing drives me up the fucking wall more than this

>>59936047
Do you know youtube-dl supports porn sites too?

>>59936407
B-but then how can I an H4x0r?

>>59912513
>>59912564
Get out this site.

File: 1447072860317.gif (2MB, 356x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 356x200px

>>59936613

>>59916232
>CNN
https://twitter.com/TrueCharter/status/853755293183901696

I literally just seconds ago used "inspect element" to grab some photos off instagram, who also disabled right click image save.

>>59920018
what about inspect element, expand the section by clicking the little arrow thingy, then double click the image link and copy?

>>59912886
>>59913449
I know. When I'm on my faptop I just ctrl+click

File: 1490775712833.jpg (56KB, 346x427px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 346x427px

>>59938163
>faptop

File: file.png (65KB, 1162x452px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1162x452px

oh, hey!

File: file.png (266KB, 1146x608px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1146x608px

>>59938599
it keeps happening
what a time to be alive

>>59938599
>oy vey
FTFY

>>59917027
>compressing an already compressed image due to laziness and/or stupidity

File: 1.png (224KB, 379x374px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 379x374px

>>59912513