>AYYYYYMD poorfags think their shitty Fury X can even compete

>>59908567
Post these piece of shit posts to >>>/b/ or >>>/v/

File: perfrel_2560_1440.png (31KB, 500x690px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x690px

>>59908567
Cool synthetic garbage there bro.

>>59908628
>Fury X BTFO by the 1070
AYYYYY

>>59908641
Great goalpost moving.

>4% difference
>28nm vs 14nm
>July 2015 vs June 2016

>>59908680
Sorry, I meant 16nm

>>59908680
Can't forget only 4GB on the Fury which is a clear bottleneck.

>>59908838
the memory on the fury is not the bottleneck. HBM memory is just so fast.

File: amdvega.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

>>59908567
NOOOO

>>59908905
It's fast but having such a small framebuffer is obviously an issue with games already using over 6GB, some shitshows even 9GB(mostly ubishit)

>>59908984
9 GB of video memory? wtf, what game is that?

File: vram.png (11KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 500x250px

>>59909011
It was some ubisoft game, can't remember which one.

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Call_of_Duty_Infinite_Warfare/4.html

Just google "techpowerup performance analysis", there's games tested there and they show VRAM usage like this one

>>59908567
sir please do the needful and delet dis