Why has this not replaced Java yet?

>>59895555
Oracle still supports java

>>59895555
It's ~4 times slower than Java

because it's the only JVM language where I actually encountered a StackOverflowException doing some really basic iteration.

>>59895555
A replacement is supposed to be better. Nice digits, though.

>>59895555
The business world moves very slowly, these things can take a decade.

Give it time.

>>59895723
LOLWUT
>make up shit
>shitpost on /g/

>>59895555
Two words anon

>technical
>debt

No sane business will invest money in replacing their currently working java apps for scala shill points.

Java is with us for the long haul.

File: clojure.png (16KB, 250x189px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 250x189px

>>59895555

>>59897977
Nobody is using Scala to replace Java, they're using it to extend Java.
We use Scala at work because it integrates directly with our existing, legacy Java infrastructure.

Large projects will still be Java. Smaller projects and quick scripts are Scala.

The only thing I know about Scala is a long rant/talk from one of it's ex-committers who left the project after he realized it was kind of fucked.

>>59895555
Isn't Kotlin the new meme JVM language?

File: logo-small.png (5KB, 190x88px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 190x88px

Why has this not replaced Haskell yet?

>Java WAS slow, back in the day. It has become much faster, due to a few generations of performance enhancements. Last I heard, it is usually within 10% of C# speed -- sometimes faster, sometimes slower. Java applet startup is still slow because you've got to start a whole JVM, which has to load all it's classes.Jan 29, 2010
>%10
xd

>>59898284
>within 10%