>

>C can't complete a full race distance without breaking down

so C++ is better?

I mean it really is, but what is this thread getting at?

>>59888694
Cancer

>>59888709
truth hurts?

even if you were forced into using C, Vala would be a better choice since it's actually safe and uses C as its IR

What's the Go version of this

>>59888788
an aborted fetus that's slower than C and Java and fails at being particularly good or useful.

>>59888662
That's not a McLaren

>>59888813
DELET

>>59888744
>thruth hurts
Thanks for reminding me about good old BFMV

>>59888813
Proofs

>>59888899
interface cancer because no generics

said interface cancer breaks type safety

no fucking good abstraction and strictly imperative which is just terrible to work with.

https://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/go.html

very similar performance at best, assuming this benchmark took into account JIT lag or did not.

File: slow_huh.jpg (56KB, 638x479px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 638x479px

>>59888641

>>59889171
>java that fast
is this real life

>>59889216
yes

the JVM is probably one of the fastest, safe VMs in the world.

all these neo LLVM backed meme languages wish they could compete against a proper JIT compiled VM like Java's JVM

>>59889260
>Java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
SUCC

>>59889292
Subverted by increasing the heap size. OutOfMemoryError occuring in production is the dev's fault

OP is a NEET, nothing to see here.

>>59889216
Java being slow is a meme. Java is so widely used, so many billions of dollars of business activity relies on it, that *shitloads* of man-hours have gone into making the language and JVM efficient.

File: CTyeCRZWUAAYseH.jpg (96KB, 600x423px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 600x423px

>>59888833
>honda, the dreams of power