Ryzen 5 update

first

my ass hurts

>>59873978
How about you don't give people shit advice by telling them to buy Indian CPUs that perform worse than a G4560 in most games?

>>59874005
Hi, Salazar

>>59873978
Hyper TX3 Evo isn't a bad air cooler for Ryzen it seems right now.
Streamer I chat with runs an 1800x, under PRIME95 load, only hit 65*C after about half an hour.

File: 1490300232567.png (361KB, 717x717px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 717x717px

>>59874005
>He fell for the Poorfag Pentium meme

>>59874020
It does not come with an AM4 bracket out of the box.

>>59874020
At stock clocks?

>>59874052
At stock clocks, though under PRIME95, it only hit 3.7Ghz though.

He has since manually increased clocks to 3.9 manually, and sits happy at sub 70*C still.

>>59874046
Apparently does.
http://www.coolermaster.com/amd-am4-ryzen-compatability/en/

>>59874098
Interesting. I checked the specs on Newegg, since they seemed to have updated some HSF to indicate AM4 compatibility. They did not update the TX3.

>>59874142
May well be that Newegg are clearing older TX3 stock, of which may not support, or include the mounting bracket for AM4. That'd be my guess.

>>59873978
Why the fuck do you still put i5 7500 and 7600K on the list while r5 1600 is both above and below the list?

>>59874170
I will keep updating HSFs as they start shipping with AM4 brackets. For now, I can only add HSFs with guaranteed AM4 socket support.

>>59874142
TX3 already supports AM4, it uses clips only

>>59874013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4K7eIEAJx0

This never gets old.

>>59873978
Is that the PRIME x370 Pro?

If so, it only supports up to 2400Mhz DDR4 as of the latest BIOS. Though no doubt it may be able to clock higher with some work, it won't be easy.

>>59874188
R5 1600 is an alternative in the lower tier, not the default choice.

File: consistency.png (28KB, 570x520px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 570x520px

>>59874280
At least make it consistent

>>59873978
swtich i5 7500 with r5 1500x in the superb tier

File: 1420502048708.jpg (358KB, 1065x902px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1065x902px

>>59874221
>That whole comment section
Why are AMDfags always so fucking angry?

>>59874280
I think what he's trying to suggest, though in such an arsehole-ish way, is to perhaps add the 1600/(x) to the "Outstanding" tier as alternatives there. Though it would make it very crowded there, and sort of reduce the requirement for the "Excellent" tier.
Perhaps it would be worth considering dropping the 7600k to the "Excellent" Tier in that case.

>>59874312
I thought alternatives in each tier are options or upgrade paths for people who are absolutely sure they need a specialized build with either better CPU or RAM or graphics etc

>>59874348
Because they're butthurt over the fact he was right about i5 outperforming ryzen

>>59873978
>Your comments, suggestions, and criticisms are appreciated.

kill yourself

>>59874351
I think I understand. But I cannot mix two different CPU families in one tier.

>>59874505
It would certainly make it all quite a bit messy. Yes.

At first glance, it does seem odd in how it is detailed. But it does make a nice amount of sense. There's very little that can be done without ruining that I guess.

I thought all i5 series are already obsolete since R5 crushed it.
>>59873978

>>59874611
The average fps still carries them in benchmarks.
Once Ryzen matures, that may not be the case.

>>59874611
Majority of games are still lightly threaded.

>>59874623
r5 1400 might be better to put it under alternative at Very good tier.

>>59874005
>intlel
>gayming

>>59873978
Do you really need a x370 mb with r5 1600?

>>59874142
>I checked the specs on newegg
This is why your site became irrelevant

>>59874389
>logical incrememe
>for people who "absolutely need" anything

>>59873978
Where's the Asrock Taichi x370?

>>59874005
>>>/v/