Why are these microshit shills allowed to shit up Ars Tecnica again?

Typical example of their "journalism":

>We're getting to the point in the run-up to a new generation of consoles where certain people become obsessed with comparing spec numbers to determine once and for all which new system will be "more powerful" (and therefore "better"). Thus far this kind of navel-gazing stat-measuring contest seems to show numerical advantages of 30 percent to 50 percent for the PlayStation 4 over the Xbox One

>>59868493
And then:

>Evaluating a new piece of gaming hardware based solely on the numbers on a spec sheet is always tough. That said, the Scorpio specifications Microsoft put out today through Eurogamer suggest the system should easily outclass the current top-of-the-line PS4 Pro. Between the faster CPU, improved GPU, and extra RAM and bus bandwidth, it's not hard to believe Microsoft's next console will be able to deliver games that can run at a fully native 4K resolution with solid, high frame rates.

>>59868493
>>59868505

There's nothing wrong with this.

>>59868482
Microsoft pays them to do so, it's their job. Look up "Microsoft evangelist"

File: 1393546238768.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>59868587
http://techrights.org/2008/12/27/microsoft-shills-aka-te-secrets/

>>59868670
Nice way to say shill

>>59868482
how do you explain this this:
https://arstechnica.co.uk/gaming/2017/04/the-xbox-one-loses-another-exclusive-third-party-developer/

>>59868493
>>59868505
So? In the end PS4 was much faster than Xbone and it's likely that new Xbone will be faster than new PS4.

>>59868482
Ars Technica has been unreadable trash for about five years now since they jumped on the retarded social justice bandwagon

File: 1486545484106.jpg (436KB, 864x1080px) Image search: [Google]

436KB, 864x1080px

>>59869003
This.