RU ready for the 5xx Rebrandeons?

>>59858183
>that pricing for a garbage polaris rebrand
gg AyyMD

>>59858261
>Euro MSRP

Wow it's fucking nothing.

>>59858321
>Expect pricing to be around the same range as custom Radeon RX 480 models, around $229– $279 US.

>>59858183

Usually dividing the price in € by 1.3 is an indication for the price in $.

>>59858183
>reference

No thanks.
If they can squeeze out some extra clockspeed then this will put it firmly over a 1060, and considering Volta isn't landing until middle of 2018...

>>59858530
People will still buy jewvidia due to the branding, the RX 480 right now is clearly the better choice over a 1060

>>59858541
Anything's fine as long as AMD gets the market back, their CPU situation is much more important at the moment though, that's what's funding the GPU division

Will it have a HEVC and VP9 decoder as efficient as Skylake iGPUs?

>>59858368
Not really.
Every country has different prices and it's almost always more expensive than in the US because fuck Europe I guess.

>>59858584
Let me pull up my crystal ball of No Fucks Given

>>59858530
I thought there would be gtx 10 series rebrands this year?

>>59858606
You people seem to forget that in europe prices
have VAT included. When you were praising RX 480 8GB for around 250$ we were paying around 300€ but our prices just have the VAT included.

File: 5963b727e077b3c58c3f357872b7935d0ec05e13928d6048abf9f27d2ded10da.jpg (126KB, 1280x1261px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1280x1261px

>>59858183
I'm out of the loop. Did Vega get delayed? Canceled? What's with these rebrands?

is amd releasing anything to compete with the gtx1080?

>>59858712
better process, lpp
beta testing for vega
vega will be announced in computex

>>59858715
Yes, Vega. In May or June.

>>59858183
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1332121-REG/msi_rx_580_gaming_x_8g_radeon_rx_580_gaming.html

File: laugh.jpg (18KB, 248x189px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 248x189px

>>59858754
>$253
AMDtards will actually pay for this.

>>59858647
Maybe in Q3, I've seen zero news about it after the initial rumors several months ago

>>59858777
Gtx 1060 is around that price. If the 480 is kicking the 1060 ass now, I'd imagine the 580 would too.

AYYMD REBRANDEON HOUSEFIRES

>>59858183
>RU
Fucking though it's about Russians
Why you mocking me?

>>59858749
So... Do I need to Just Wait™?

>>59858807
>480 is kicking the 1060 ass
Nice projecting poojeet

>>59858754
Why would a brand new GPU be priced at $253?

File: Screenshot from 12-04-2017 18:08:47.png (111KB, 785x684px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 785x684px

>>59858896
NO NO ITS A LIE

File: speccy mrk3.png (56KB, 606x580px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 606x580px

>>59858896
It does tho..
I've got a 1060 myself and it's trash.
Sure I've OC'd mine to the wall @ 2070Mhz, but I'd still rather a 480.

>>59858584
I tried hevc and vp9 codec with rx470. it was very fine.

>>59858735
At this rate its gonna be another flop like Fury.

so 580 is just rebranded 480?

>>59859085
On better process with higher clocks.

>>59859101
so a rebranded 480?

>>59859123
Yes.

>>59859085
>>59859123
Refreshed the 5xx series should average 1500mhz

I never got a 480. Is it smart to get a 580?

>>59859598
And your current GPU is?

File: 1476064990944.jpg (1MB, 1154x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1154x1500px

I don't buy anything AMD

AMD drivers are utterly terrible and AMD cards are 100% more likely to have issues, it's fact.

>>59859613
1070

>>59859629
>AMD drivers are utterly terrible
What year it is?

File: Screenshot from 12-04-2017 05:38:57.png (59KB, 1188x611px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1188x611px

>>59859629
Great Quality Nvidia Drivers there.

>>59859642
2017, amd cards have 100% more likely to have issues, it's a fact look it up. Nvidia cards are more expensive because they are cooler, safer and more stable.

>>59859675
>cooler, safer and more stable.
I summon EXPLODING EVGA.

>>59859695
that doesn't count

you can't point to a specific and rare problem and claim all cards have that problem

amd cards are on average much hotter than nvidias

>>59859717
>that doesn't count
Then what counts? No vendor has major hardware problem for ages.
>amd cards are on average much hotter than nvidias
Polaris is as effective as Maxwell, i.e. Pascal, while offering actual async.

>>59859733
ages? I remember the 200 series for AMD being complete garbage with tons of issues and the 300 series not be that much better

>>59859768
>I remember the 200 series for AMD being complete garbage with tons of issues
Shitty stock cooling is not an issue. Also 3.5. Now neck yourself.

>>59859733
>Polaris is as effective as Maxwell
Kek

>>59858735
It was already using lpp anon.

>>59859780
It is.

>>59859775
cooling wasn't the only issue

black screens, blue screens, every screen color, amd 200/300 series was terrible and a complete crapshoot

>>59859733
>Polaris is as effective as Maxwell, i.e. Pascal
Fuck off

What kind of improvement should we see with the 1060+1070 getting gddr5x. I mean, nvidias charging $300 for the new 1060.

>>59859796
It is.

>>59859789
a 14 nm chip is as effective as a 28nm chip?

lol

>>59858699
US doesn't have vat, and when you order online there are no taxes. Europe is just protectionist as fuck.

>>59859836
Fiji has similar perf/watt aka "efficiency" as Polaris and it's 28nm

>>59859869
pffffffffffft hahahahahahaha

>>59859869
And Polaris is half-Fiji anyway.

>>59859877
What's funny?
Check the perf/watt charts

>>59859889
Soon instead of saying everything is a lie they'll start trying to convince you AMD never existed.

>>59859869
It's some 8-10% more efficient, hardly anything worth noting.
And as someone said Polaris is basically half of Fiji anyway

>>59859675
>safer
Lul. Youre just a brainwashed video gaymer or old guy that does not follow technology. Or myabe youre just baiting :^)

File: perfrel_1920_1080[1].png (28KB, 500x690px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x690px

And its reference 480 too which are garbage compared to reference 1060. Kek.

>>59860164
Does anyone even care about the reference cards for those two? Who buys that crap?

>>59858183
im happy with my rx 480
will probably upgrade in a few years though

>>59858949
HEVC Main 10?

>>59860222
yes, main 10. LAV codec in setup spesifies what you can decode with your gpu. 8 bit and 10 bit hevc, as well as vp9 was in it.

>>59860203
Same with RX470. In fact i have excessive power for my needs. Play every major title at high/ultra at stable 60+ FPS.

File: perfwatt_2560_1440.png (28KB, 500x690px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x690px

>>59859733
>Polaris is as effective as Maxwell, i.e. Pascal

>>59859856
False.

>>59861365
>gaymen
We're talking compute/watt. GCN has an underutilisation problem.

>>59861963
>We

>>59858584

VP9 decoder on Polaris is a shit! High CPU usage.

I have a RX 470.

>>59858183
Who cares, I have an Intel whatever onboard POS and it can run most any game at acceptable doodles.

Are the majority of posters in these threads chinese or poos running into their first GPU money?

>>59861682
No he is actually right.