Once and for all: Is DuckDuckGo a botnet?

>>59850708
Yes it is owned by google. Only idiot would use it without VPN and 15 layers of skeletons.

>>59851038
I don't think that's true.

Known to leak information, but still vastly superior to market leaders.

>>59851051
no one cares what you think google.com/is_gogoduck_owned_by_google

>>59851059
>it's true
What the fuck should we use then?

File: 1491864508142.jpg (17KB, 313x286px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 313x286px

>>59850708
Partial BotNet.
But personally think it's the best option.
It's has pretty good ui.

>>59850708
You really have to ask?
Especially since it's made for the user in mind?
Seriously?

No, of course not. I don't even know why would you even need to ask? God damn, you're retarded. Giving information isn't wrong either, I don't know why you're making a big deal out of this? Everyone should use this because it's obviously not botnet. Regardless if it's botnet or not, you should use it.

>>59850708
We don't know so we assume the worst. Use it with caution.

>>59851420
startpage

>>59851059
source

Read about its jew owner

Woah last time I was on /g/ everyone jerked each other off over duckduckgo, now it too is a bot net?

It's almost like you fucks have no idea what you're talking about...

>>59854163
>It's almost like you fucks have no idea what you're talking about...

Its almost like in the tech world, shit changes real fast.
DuckDuckGo was great until the owner sold out

>>59850708
Everything is botnet.

>>59852937
https://duck.co/forum/thread/2376/who-is-duckduckgo-owned-by

"Duck.com was acquired by Google when they purchased On2 Technologies. We have made attempts to purchase this domain but it has not been successful so far. "

>>59851038
No, it's not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duckduckgo

>>59854287
duck.com is not duckduckgo

>>59854287
fucking idiot

>>59854287
Are you actually retarded?

>>59850708
Yes Nigga but what's gud 4 da gander is good 4 da goose