>he uses the object oriented programming paradigm

>>59810858
kek

>his non oop language still uses classes and objects
You can't escape it unless you use C.

>>59810858
Who are you quoting?

>>59810905
>he doesn't use C

What's wrong with OOP? What other paradigm do you suggest using?

>>59811689
objects are fine. Having literally everything revolve around objects is stupid. Go has a good balance on this (in spite of other flaws) where it's perfectly normal and acceptable to have functions not related to a class (struct). Other languages where you have to use static functions to do things like this... The idea of "static function" is already barbaric. The word "function" already means that it relies on nothing other than the input to make the output.

>>59812193
The most important part of OOP is that everything is an object. You can't half-ass it.

>>59812206
>getX
>getY
>setX
>getX().getY().getZ().doFoo(getSomething())

https://www.bosslinux.in/boss-mool

I don't understand programming or what object oriented means, but I was told it's hilarious that India's national Linux distribution is object oriented.

File: ss.jpg (410KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 750x500px

Joke is on you. I only write spaghetti squash code.

>>59812529
>>59812529
I hate Java syntax too but that's no reason to hate OOP. Hate OOP for its faults, not Java's.