What filesystem should i choose?

>>59810024
NTFS obviously

>no ReiserFS

Use a different distro.

>>59810024
HFS+

HFS Plus

>>59810036
>>59810049
>>59810061
Lalmao guys XD i will choose them all

>>59810024
RedSea

>>59810024
50 FAT16 partitions
DO IT

>>59810049
>>59810061
>>59810068
Bait.

Use Fat16 anon.

>>59810024
XFS; it's very solid, performs well. The Ext series are only vaguely okay, btrfs has a lot of promise but isn't quite reliable enough yet.

>>59810024
EFI System Partition

APFS nigger

How can you even think of choosing something other than ZFS?

>>59810024
For now, ext4 is a safe choice.

In the future, btrfs might replace ext4 as the default choice of the mainstream distros. But before that can happen, btrfs has to prove itself as mature and stable as ext4 for several years.

>>59810024
Journaled EXT4 or btrfs

swap area, it's perfect for all use cases

Ext4

>>59810205
ZFS hogs RAM and its featureset and requirements aren't appropriate for desktops. It's also not in the list, but you knew that.

>>59810175
This

>>59810236
literally this

>>59810024
HDD - EXT4
SSD - F2FS

>>59810175
>>59810257

What's better about xfs than ext4? Not meant to be inflammatory, I'm genuinely curious

>>59810567
Generally better performance, especially when needing to check the filesystem. Supports larger filesystems, though unless you're running a really fucking massive RAID, that's unlikely to matter. In general more reliable, at least in my experience.

>>59810707
What advantages does it have over NTFS?

>>59810734
it's not shit

>>59810707
Wait, can filesystems affect reliability of drives when running RAID 0?

File: 1360888039440.jpg (167KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 2048x1536px

ExFAT the way to go for portable storage like a USB flash drive?

>>59810766
Not as far as I know.

>>59810024
ext4, btrfs or xfs

>>59810024
Swap

>>59810024
add support for murderfs and use it

>>59810024
exFAT

>>59810024
physical volume for encryption obviously

>>59810024
Daily reminder Hans Ext murdered his wife.

btrf

File: 1340423283363.jpg (134KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 413x395px

>>59810940
Yeah, swap those ntfs partitiions for ext4.

>btrfs isn't safe to use yet
Holy shit people it's 2017. I've been using btrfs since 2012 and have never lost anything. Btrfs is stable and production ready. Stop spreading memes.
Although I'll admit that you can't use btrfs for software raid5/6 yet and that zfs is a better alternative.

>>59810024
Everything besides FAT16 is bloatware

>>59812976

>Btrfs is stable and production ready

lel

>still need to update to latest kernel to get critical bugfixes
>Raid5/6 still unstable, still has write hole

just use ZFS already

JFS

>>59810024
Learn how to take a screenshot dumbfuck you're on a live usb