What is the superior package manager?

chocolatey

>>59805368
Muh Windows 8.1 doesn't have this shit so gtfo of my board.

>>59805368
eopkg

>>59805368
OneGet

pkgin

templeOS

>>59805392
Install chocolatey

File: sudo pacman s jesus.png (66KB, 891x943px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 891x943px

>>59805368
Fixd

>>59805368
apt because it's the only one I know and I don't feel like re-inventing the wheel.

File: [Asenshi] Amanchu! - 01 [5E55B1C0].mkv_thumbs_[2016.07.17_20.30.40].jpg (202KB, 1024x646px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 1024x646px

>>59805368
>apt
fucking ew

pacman > apt > portage > yum

>>59805616

>Jesus has a dependency that has dependencies
>can't fetch it automatically

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

>>59806631

Fuck you for putting the fagmans on suicide watch so soon. I hoped this would be a long thread.

UPS

Zypper > DNF > APT > Pacman > YUM

I haven't used portage or anything else yet.

>>59806681
That's a parcel manager, silly

>>59805368
Portage > *

Portage obviously

File: 1482202611833.jpg (103KB, 700x453px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 700x453px

>>59805392
>tfw you have to use browser to find software to download it and then install it.

While I can just type sudo pacman -S steam-native-runtime

>inb4 you have to type all this you faggot!!!
What is <TAB> completion

>inb4 you have to know package name!!
What is search

Windows users are inferior.

>>59806631
Never happened to me.
Long time pacman user reporting in.

>updating with pacmn breaks your system!
In 1.5 years no problems.

>Still using apt-get
>Not just using apt
>2017

>>59806823
What if it is not in the default repository? You have to search the internet anyway.

Windows also has chocolatey, or ninite if you are lazy.

>>59806901
What is yaourt

There is really low chance that something you could possibly want does not exist in pacman and in yaourt.

>ITT: Snowflake package managers

>>59806931
pacman eats your shit constantly, and searching for software online is less of a hassle than having to fix your system for the hundredth time.

Other package managers are missing shit constantly.

>>59805368
apt, it just fucking works

>>59806963
>pacman broke my system, again!!!
It's a meme.
Using arch linux for more than a year now and having no issues.
Before reading here that pacman breaks system I had no idea it does. How can I achive that?
Really, tell me, I want to see how people does that and try to fix it (maybe I'll learn a thing or two).

>>59805368
I use apt because it just fucking werks while pacman just plain doesn't work and zypper is slow as fuck. Then there's yum which is a total shitpile. Really, fuck Fedora.

>>59805392
Your board is /v/, faggot. How about you leave?

>>59806823
>Arch users calling Windows users inferior
I guess having every other piece of software break and this >>59806631 isn't as bad as forced updates and CIA nigger spying.

>>59807094
I just did pacman -Syu on my +1 year old arch install, rebooted and it worked.
Fuck...
How can I break my arch install with pacman updates???

>>59807092
>Using arch linux for more than a year now and having no issues.
Buy a lottery ticket. Your luck levels defy reason.

>>59807141
Is there any evidence of pacman breaking system?
Like legit screenshots?
I haven't seen any of this.

>>59807121
see >>59807141

>>59807201
See >>59807187

>>59807206
Personal experience. 99.99% of people who user Arsch Linux normally experience horrible problems. You are the 0.01%.

>>59806623
>pacman
>have to do a manual intervention every 2nd update

>>59807225
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[citation needed]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]

>>59807246
ffs stop taking that cunts bait

Only used apt and dnf. Apt is quicker but the output is virtually unreadable, so I prefer dnf.

>>59807225
Only words means nothing.

>apt-get
>apt-cache
>apt-mark
>apt-spy
>aptitude

awfully designed pile of crud

I don't get it
if pacman can break your system then so can apt-get upgrade

>>59807334
>pacman broke my system!!!
It's overused bait...

>>59806845

>Never happened to me.
>Long time pacman user reporting in.

Well then you must be a faggot of a colossal caliber, because it is a well known fact that pacman doesn't automatically solve recursive dependencies beyond a few levels.

>>59807402
Tell me what to install with pacman to break my system.

File: fuck off.jpg (23KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x600px

>>59807402

>>59807419
>>59807422

>Tell me what to install with pacman to break my system.
>Being so stupid that you don't understand the technical limitations of you package manager (because you didn't read the documentation in the first place) and believe that it means that something breaks.

Goddamn imbeciles go back to Windows.

>>59807458
Why would I ask to provide evidence for pacman breaking something if I would believe that it breaks something.
Are you mentally challenged?

People complains that pacman breaks software, asking for evidence, no one provides it.

Forgot your medication from dyslexia?

>>59805368

This
>>59805400
>>>59805368 (OP)
>eopkg

Or simply pacman. And (random) breakage is a blatant lie.
Have been running (the same) arch for three years now, and my only problem was due to the infinality bundle, which is not due to arch, but rather to my own stupidity, and the fix was relatively easy as well

>>59807487

>People complains that pacman breaks software, therefore every post mentioning pacman is a post saying that pacman breaks stuff. Thus I don't read the posts anymore or try to understand them, I just shitpost.

Did I ever say that pacman breaks stuff you fucking idiot? You belong in Windows dumbass.

>>59805392
install gentoo

>>59807487

>People complains
>medication from dyslexia

>>59807507

it's just a Pajeet dude, chill. he can't 100% understand what you typed.

>>59807507
Well tel me, retard, if pacman doesn't recursively solve dependencies doesn't that mean that trying to install something it would fail, therefore "breaking" ability to install software or if you're retarded enough force install it and wouldn't that software be called "broken" because of missing dependencies, therefore pacman "broke something"?
How else all these retards saying "pacman breaks my system!!!"?
If you're not on the side of these retards, then leave, no one asked you how pacman works.

>>59807536

You sure are triggered Pajeet. What are error messages? What are safety measures? Don't get me wrong, Pacman is a shit tier package manager, but for other reason that you're not smart enough to understand. Go back to Windows.

>>59807548
>Go back to Windows
take your own advice, faggot

>>59807557

Oh I am on Windows. Nothing works like Windows, and using Windows is better than being an edgy faggot who types in broken English but thinks he's hot shit for using an OS that he doesn't even understand.

>>59807548
It's just your posts are irrelevent.
>trying to be involved into discussion about disproving "pacman broke my system!!!" bait
ask for practical example how to recreate it
>tells theory without practical example
???

Did you really want attention so much?
Go to /r9k/, plenty of threads seeking attention.

>>59806631
Aren't you confusing slackware and arch?

>>59807319
this is why i hate apt and love pacman

>>59807602

>trying to be involved into discussion about disproving "pacman broke my system!!!" bait

Samefag or another dumbfuck who's too stupid to understand what he reads? Quote the post where it says that pacman breaks your system; you can't.

Someone give me an example of a package that pacman can't install.

>>59807584
>go back to windows
>oh I am on windows
kek
How many shekels you got pajeet?

>be on amd64
>add i386 as a foreign architecture with dpkg
>suddenly apt can't fucking install literally anything anymore without shitting itself 10 times over

>>59807623
This.
Do that, I'll try and post results.

>>59805368
sbopkg

>>59807094
Fedora uses dnf now, and is probably the best package manager

Bing bong

>>59805368
Portage

>>59807623
games
>the good ones

nix

>>59807225
>personal exp
>99.99 percent of arch users
OK Kid.

Portage/emerge > pacman > everything else

>>59805368
pacman or yaourt

>>59805368
SCCM

>>59806631
You are retarded. The only way that would even be possible is if you were trying to

pacman -U package.tar.xz

an AUR package that hahs AUR dependencies that are not installed. If you want to install AUR packages, you should use an AUR package manager like yaourt. AUR is not part of the official repos and is not in any way officially supported.

Jesus installed Linux, and rebooted on the third day.

His hard disk was wiped for our transgressions, he was formatted for our iniquities, by his hard disk being formatted we are healed.

God showed his love for us in that while we were still Windows users, he sent his son to install Linux for us.

>>59811460
Unfortunately, he never got around to making actual Linux drivers

>>(OP)
Use the one that came with your distro.

>>59811608
>he fell for the "linux has no drivers" meme
Nigger, Linux is compatible with a larger variety of hardware than any other operating system out there.

File: dtw.jpg (38KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 250x250px

>>59811695

>>59811739
Given that donald trump is a compulsive liar I think we can assume that also means "correct", "perhaps", and "how am I supposed to know?".

SUDO anime
Loloololololol

>>59811834
life protip: assume feds are lying by default

Portage

>>59807225
>my experience constitutes 99.99% of the userbase

People who hate on apt are turboautistic just use fish and learn where the tab key is on your keyboard you fucking retards.

>>59805368
git && make

File: 30384474.jpg (60KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 900x900px

>>59812438
>>59811152
>>59811066
>>59806794
>>59806711
BROTHERS

>>59805368
yum

>>59805368
apk

Not Android either.

>>59806252
this

>>59814643
this

apt fucked me yesterday

>>59806252
>i dont feel like reiventing the real

if you look closely, he's saying he doesn't like to learn. don't hire this guy or associate with him, he will contribute to your stagnation.

File: 1442201226644.png (16KB, 327x192px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 327x192px

>>59805368
Sorceror, is not bloated, can handle binaries and source code, even your own source code, can create your own repositories, can handle the kernel, fancy terminology.

File: 1491773373267.jpg (89KB, 800x585px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x585px

>>59805368
>using a package manager

>>59805368
sudo apt-get install Lucifer

portage is probably the best honestly

File: Trap-image.png (137KB, 640x409px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 640x409px

desu, no meme, Portage / Emerge, you have so many options with optimization, and how you compile things!

>>59805368
DNF is the fastest. It uses a SAT dependency resolver and does binary deltas against the packages it downloads.

Fedora wins again.

>>59805368
npm in the good old days when you could unpublish an 11-line function and break the world

inb4 never used it, I really hope they removed that shit from earth

>>59807235
>

>>59807225
>Arsch

Go back to Krautchan

if you break a computer with pacman you probably would've broken it with something else retards.

I have used dnf, apt, pacman, and probably a fuck ton more package managers over my time on linux.

Concerning yourself with this is autism. I have never had any issue on any package manager.

XBPS, the fastest

>>59805368
Dnf