Don't be worried. Google Truth is the future.

>>59784875
I just searched 'trump breitbart' in a private tab and I didn't get a single "OBJECTION!". Call me disappointed.

>DateTime.Now.Year
>using google

Don't worry I'm sure they won't abuse this at all

The point of news is not to know the truth. It's to know what everyone else thinks.

We live in a world where sometimes we need to do controlled experiments and sometimes we need to do surveys. One tool for one job. Live the Unix philosophy.

>>59784875
CAN I GET A FACT CHECK, ON THE FLY

>>59784875
Who fact checks the fact checkers?

>>59784875
Requesting fact check on this. Is this true?

Hopefully this will put a stop to all the fearmongering going on.

Oh who am I kidding, regardless of "side" people are still going to buy into fearmongering. Seems like a useless endeavor on googles behalf. Why not just work with social media companies to effectively shadow ban incorrect statements, with media orgs to effectively slam them back a google page (cutting down their 'views') if they produce obviously fake news, and then with research publishers to weed out weak studies? That'll cut down shit but I suppose a simple check mark will do.

>fake news
aka things which shouldnt be known by the average retard

>>59784939
whoever has the biggest wallet

>>59784949
The problem with Google is that it feeds back what you put in. Put in propaganda and it will give you the people spouting it. You have to know the truth before you can google that, so conservatards are at a total loss. Adjusting the results so they're not a complete propaganda bubble at least gives the viewer something to sift through. They'll probably pick the propaganda since it's designed to be more appealing than the boring truth, but who knows? Maybe they do have two brain cells to rub together.

>>59784939
An AI will judge the source of information to see if it's reputable or not, so there's no chance of human error!