>2017 >Gnome still does not have thumbnails in the file picker

>>59764230
its right there anon

>>59764254

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as thumbnail, is in fact, image preview/shitty DE, or as I've recently taken to calling it, image preview plus shitty DE. Image preview is not a thumnail unto itself, but rather a demonstration that a fully functioning Shitty DE thumbnail system is possible, but Gnome devs are fucking lazy.

File: Untitled.jpg (192KB, 1059x621px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1059x621px

>>59764230
>tfw superior OS

File: GNOME vs KDE.png (968KB, 1277x1281px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 1277x1281px

>>59764230
KDE doesn't have this problem, stay mad GTKlets

>>59764230
>posting this thread without the relevant link
How do you fuck this up every time? https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154&

>>59764356
true but that's not the filepicker

File: omggood.jpg (345KB, 584x741px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 584x741px

>>59764356
>winfag tries to butt in
>doesn't even know difference between file picker and file manager

>>59764416
>Dutch girlfriend
>murrikans can't tell the difference between Dutch and Danish

>>59764416
wait, isn't the KDE guy on the right gay and in love with the left one?

File: 1488104991443.png (171KB, 664x945px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 664x945px

>tfw KDE master race

>install furryfox with kde bits so that you'll have a working file picker
>crashes every second time you post something
welp
so much for shitposting on linux

File: 1481918605312.png (3KB, 597x493px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 597x493px

>>59764321

>>59764639
Chromium does not have this problem.

>>59764668
chromium has the problem of being chromium

>>59764639
>crashes every second time you post something
I think you are making this up. I've been using the patched version of Firefox for years on multiple different computers and have never had that problem.

It's unacceptable and I'm baffled by the problem still persisting to this day. There are numerous solutions, but they refuse to merge one. Fucking faggots.

File: 1490384377955.jpg (230KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 800x600px

>>59764230
there's a patch for kde picker.

only i know true suffering - all my pictures are in the same folder, and since there's 50 000 of them i am forced to use shitty gnome filechooser, as every other filechooser and/or filemanager hangs and than hangs itself upon opening that monster of a folder. even windows explorer. i'm forever stuck with those tiny ass thumbs.

>>59764743
y u have 50k pics in a single folder you turbotard

>>59764718
>>59764230

GNOME got compromised by experimental UX charlatans and diversity/inclusion parasites, so it was inevitable there would be a massive cost to pay in product quality and cycle time. Hopefully the whole thing collapses soon.

>>59764743
Well no shit it hangs when it ahs to generate all the thumbnails. Generate the thumbnails ahead of time or better yet, stop storing so many images you maymay hoarding faggot. Seriously.
>2017
>He saves images from 4chan to his computer
costanza.jpg

File: komeiji satori (touhou) drawn by oubou - Danbooru - b451595def903e31c27ca806292a39e7.jpg (196KB, 945x945px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 945x945px

>>59764753
do you expect me to tag and sort 50k of random photos, wallpapers, 2hus, anime shit, macros, memes, spacecraft and warhammer, you supreme autist?

>>59764773
Damn, I thought I was fucked with 30k. It can be sort of done, anon.
That or we wait for image viewing bots to git gud so that it tags everything for you.

>>59764773
why you have them in a single folder in the first place
my god

File: komeiji satori (touhou) drawn by mozukuzu (manukedori) - Danbooru - cee37769f20a863037171f6bf5dd0e6b.png (585KB, 635x801px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 635x801px

>>59764763
>when it ahs to generate all the thumbnails
no. i have thumbs generated and on ssd, but everything except shitty gtk filepicker hangs anyway.
>stop storing so many images
there is 10 years worth of memories there, anon. it's all i have.

File: adiane36ef918c27d60b36472599b5f0ec5664.jpg (329KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 1000x1000px

>>59764782
because i have ocd and picking a folder from which i attach an image this time around was giving me a physical fucking pain. and i have to attach an image each time i post, because ocd.

>>59764798

you should not expect software to be designed specifically to cater to your mental illness

File: 5234561612411453goro_03_001.jpg (65KB, 810x608px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 810x608px

>>59764813
well gtk filechooser is designed specifically for that task. so it DOES have a purpose.

>>59764828

go on, file a bug at the gnome project saying it's slow when you use it wrong.

>>59764798
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooool

>>59764679
well, it does

had to go back to the shitty vanilla version

File: blame____sanakan_by_icyymir-d7fl8qb.jpg (1MB, 900x1330px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1330px

>>59764830
my dude, you misunderstand. gnome filechoose is the fastest one. it opens that folder instantaneously. which is why i'm forced to use it.

nautilus, on the other hand, just dies halfway. as in it physically can't open that folder properly.

>>59764866

nautilus is part of the gnome project. asking it to thumbnail 50,000 images dumped by an idiot into a single directory is using it wrong.

go, file a bug. now.

File: 1275172790189.jpg (450KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1920x1200px

>>59764897
god you're annoying, like a stupid dog that won't shut the fuck up even though it has no clue at all.

>>59764972

what's the matter? afraid of seeing your moronic complaint closed in 30 seconds, tagged WONTFIX and "user error"?

File: 42675978.jpg (185KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1024x768px

>>59764980
no, just offended by your autism.

GTK has nothing to do with gnome

File: 1491044529100.jpg (60KB, 350x510px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 350x510px

>>59764356
>discussion is on filepicker
>shows file manager screenshot
windows users, ladies and gentlemen

File: gnome_user_who_submitted_bug_141154.jpg (88KB, 800x583px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 800x583px

>MFW Canonical makes one now that they're using Gnome again

>>59765026
kek

>>59765026
>there's people that actually believe this

>>59765078
And it won't be merged because gnome doesn't need no thumbnails, so they'll have to use a patched version.

>>59764230
isnt the point of opensource software that it can be implemented by anyone?
why didnt anybody just implement a thumbnail preview in gnome?
what is stopping us?

File: 1489596073714.png (43KB, 602x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 602x500px

>>59764230
My OpenSUSE Leap with KDE does not have this problem.

>>59765164
You'd have to completely fork GTK and maintain it because GTK devs refuse to merge shit.

>>59765184
I see no problem there.
>Canonical forking GTK
>Canonical actually patching and improving GTK
>Official GTK becomes obsolete as everyone uses GTBuntu for their projects
>GTK devs get buttmad
>start literally throwing shit around like mad apes
>no one cares

As Ubuntu is moving to GNOME, maybe they will finally fix this embarrassment.