Bitmessage

>>59750136
Never used but looks promising.

Didnt this have a lot of security loopholes?

>>59752371

I think so

https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0


Thats why i asked in the first place

>>59750136
is that still around?

>>59753302

Its still being worked on and developed afaik. Either way its a p2p protocol, not a service, so anyone could use it at any time as long as they have the software.

What about ring.cx?
GNU is sponsoring it or something

>>59753849

Very different from Bitmessage. Bitmessage is P2P and eliminates the need for central servers altogether. Ring is end to end encrypted but still goes through a central server. Its more like XMPP then Bitmessage.

Why would you even bother with this when there is OTR XMPP which is virtually impossible to crack anyways.

>>59752850
Isn't this a little old and improvements have already made?

>>59756775

I dont know, thats why i asked kek. Whats the general opinion on this here? Is it considered secure and reliable or still in its infancy? I really like the idea behind it, but im not sure if that idea is executed well. Most of this stuff goes beyond me, i can get somewhat of an understanding of what is going on but i wouldnt be able to answer questions like that.

https://vuvuzela.io/

>>59750136
Another dead in the water, post-Snowden overhyped shit tool that nobody actually uses.

Also inb4 jokes like ring.cx and ricochet

>>59756955
>Whats the general opinion on this here
Never heard of it and by the looks of this thread, neither does /g/.

>>59757792

So what is a good alternative then?