Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Wi-Fi sex toy with built-in camera fails penetration test 2017-04-04 10:59:48 Post No. 59742688
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Wi-Fi sex toy with built-in camera fails penetration test 2017-04-04 10:59:48 Post No. 59742688
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 2.27.34 PM.png (331KB, 1352x1404px) Image search:
[Google]
331KB, 1352x1404px
Wi-Fi sex toy with built-in camera fails penetration test
Anonymous
2017-04-04 10:59:48
Post No. 59742688
[Report]
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/04/intimate_adult_toy_fails_penetration_test/
>Sex toy designer Svakom decided that a vibrator needed a camera on the end, and it also needed a Wi-Fi access point – with the utterly predictable result that the device is hackable.
>Pen Test Partners – these jokes just write themselves, really – took a look at the device, and the researchers probably wish they hadn’t, because the Svakom Siime Eye is an early favourite for a hypothetical 2017’s Worst Internet-of-S**t Product award.
>Looking at the Android app, Pen Test Partners’ (PTP’s) researchers first turned up “some hard-coded credentials, and a hard-coded IP address and port.”
>The hard-coded credentials, admin:blank, make it “trivial” to connect to the dildo’s Web admin interface, PTP writes, and even better – the Web app serves the video from the camera, and because it’s an access point, an attacker within range can identify users.
>>
I've got nothing to hide.
>>
>predictions for 2017: Flying cars, vacations to the moon
>reality of 2017: Dildos have web admin interfaces
>>
Where exactly is the camera? Does it go inside of the vag? Isn't that kinda pointless without a light?
>>
>>59742688
>fails penetration test
LITERALLY ONE THING IT HAD TO DO RIGHT
>>
>>59742688
I'm reading this, and all I can think about is all the giantess/insertion porn that could be made using it.
>>
>>59743691
Why wouldn't it have a light too?
>>
>>59743691
>Where exactly is the camera? Does it go inside of the vag?
That reminds me of this TV programme, made by ITV, called "21st Century Guide to Sex for girls" or something like that.
There's this section where they actually attached a camera to the inside of a vag and showed a penis thrusting in and out from the perspective from within the vag.
It was so hot even for a gay man. Now I only wish they did the same thing for anal.
The whole programme was practically porn as well. But you can watch it legitimately as if it's sex ed.
>>
>>59742770
Not even the interior of your butthole?
>>
>>59743794
fuck off back to /utg/
>>
>>59743719
kek
>>
>>59742688
>sex toy fails penetration test
wow.
>>
>>59742688
I remember when digitalrevtv reviewed the siime eye. Shame kai left. And lok.
>>
>>59744104
At least they're still pretty much doing the same things.
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1