>2017 >paying $3000 for a computer from 2013

You are paying for OS instead the hardware.

the specs aren't even bad

>>59740271
But you can install OS X on any hardware? As long as it's not new.

>>59740027
They updated it.

By your logic, PCs are computers from 1984.

Stay mad Pajeet!

They're releasing a modular one next year

they announced they're making a new one anyway

>>59740271
a fucking SHIT OS at that

no thank you

>>59740359
Are you retarded? All they did was reduce their markup on the same components from 400% to 300%. This is still an E5-1620 from 4 years ago and a low-end desktop gpu branded as a "workstation gpu" that's slower than a laptop gpu.

>https://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?benchmark=gfx40&did1=21099874&os1=OS%20X&api1=gl&hwtype1=dGPU&hwname1=AMD+FirePro+D500&did2=23678944&os2=Linux&api2=gl&hwtype2=dGPU&hwname2=NVIDIA+GeForce+GTX+980M

>>59740524
they updated CPUs and GPUs to current ones. These are not gaymer CPUs you stupid idiot. They're floating point for CAD and 3D modeling work.

>>59740334
Yeah. And that's why pretty much everyone has switched to hackintosh now.

The Mac Retro here is worthless.

>>59740566
>they updated CPUs and GPUs to current ones
Ok, find me an 8 core xeon at 3.0ghz that isn't 4 years old. Also, find any evidence that AMD has released an updated version of that gpu without changing its name. I'll wait.

>>59740027
damn you guys are really upset with today's announcement eh? try finding something productive to be obsessed over besides a company that sells computers you don't like.

>>59740387
keep saying it, that'll make it true
meanwhile every dev in the world happily types away on their macbook pros.

>>59740271
You could also just pirate the OS and get it for free

>>59740749
Yup, hackintosh is fucking dope, it's like what Linux users want Linux to be.

>>59740761
So it's just a command line, no DE at all?
That's what real Linux users want

File: 1490313748702.jpg (67KB, 540x534px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 540x534px

>>59740027
>2 extra cores and another 6GB of video memory is an extra $1000
Hahahahahahahahahahaha

File: mac processor.png (227KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 1366x768px

>>59740806
Do you remember the 2013 MBP's? They wanted an extra 250 dollars for a 100mhz overclock of the same processor

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-04 at 4.48.01 PM.png (48KB, 1106x236px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1106x236px

>>59740729
My shitty 3gb GTX 1060 outperforms this garbage in every way, yes even for CAD and 3d modeling work.

File: dp.jpg (20KB, 308x263px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 308x263px

>>59740729
>unironically responging to apple shills

>>59740843
Hahaha. Fucking iCucks.

>>59740843
>4gb ram
>100 dollars
was this before or after they started soldering the ram?

>>59740850
meant to reply to >>59740566

>>59740749
Same with windows but anyone that sells new laptops still charges you $50-100 for it.

In my country Mac is so expensive that the cheapest new MacBook Pro is literally 2x as expensive as a 16gb xps 15

>>59741500
What country is that?

In australia Macs aren't cheap but anything else worth buying is disgustingly overpriced to the point that it makes buying a mac seem sensible.

>>59740287
256 GB of storage is terrible for $3,000.

File: 1488675129189.png (24KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 657x527px

>>59744171
>tfw using a 5 year old MacBook and I have double the storage because I can actually upgrade this