Oh my!

>>59735658
I'd want to side with RYZEN, but...

>Early Access game

It's gonna run like shit.

>600% better

Intel bankrupt and finished

>>59735681
yeah, this. everything is under-utilized.

>testing a game that is known to be horribly optimized
>a game that hasn't even properly come out yet
>and most of all, a genuinely bad game
no thanks

>>59735658
cool, you found the one still where the 6800K was dipping

you're no better than the average Intel shill

>>59735658
That's "ultra" settings? It looks awful. Like, 2008 Google Earth tier awful. The houses don't even look like part of the landscape, and the lanscape just looks like a JPEG drawn in PS with a low-res normal map on top of it.

What game is this so I can know to hate it?

>>59735803
It's the same fucking scene, intelberg.

>>59735658
>GPU 38% 79C
>GPU 75% 68C
ok

>not one CPU core above 27% utilization

>>59735803
Exactly the point. Too many fucking shills running around /g/ with their panties in a bunch because of Ryzen.

>>59735658
>not posting a video
fuck off

>>59735781
>testing a game that is known to be horribly optimized
This retarded logic, what's the point of better system if it's can't bruteforce everything?
Well optimized games run on toasters as is.

>>59735658
Why does the one look like shit?

>>59735658
this is how intel shills cherrypick benchmarks and screenshots against ryzen

>>59736120
It doesn't looks like shit, look at the frame rate.

File: biDFHU0.gif (967KB, 270x252px) Image search: [Google]

967KB, 270x252px

>>59735658

>mfw when i purchased a ryzen 1700

File: delidthis.jpg (146KB, 794x409px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 794x409px

>>59735898
Oh no...

>gpu 38%
>bottleneck on high resolution

i don't even....

>>59736382
Nvidia magic.

>>59735658
Did you intentionally take the 1800X screenshot when a thin cloud was in the way? If you look at the trees and buildings in both, they look about the same.

>>59735658
The AMD one has a cloud covering most textures and object so of course it has higher framerate.

>>59735781
>its ok when intel does it

>>59735658
what game is this?

>>59735658
While the performance difference is rather impressive i must say that, aside from maybe a little shadding difference, both images look pretty much the same.

>>59735658
Doesn't matter. The human eye can't see above 9fps anyway.

>>59735891
>same scene
still a different still retard L2read

>>59737637
9.708122463............... to be exact

>>59736820
Why does it have better CPU utilization though?

>>59736883
battletoads 3

>>59736110
I would not use an early access game to test any hardware with. Once it's released, sure. But using early access games is nonsense, no matter what piece of hardware it show to benefit.

>>59736883
darude - sandstorm

File: 1486508875819.jpg (14KB, 460x416px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 460x416px

>mfw AMD is so irrelevant they need to compare their CPUs to the 6-core and 8-core Intels that nobody fucking buys for gaming

>And they're still better than AMD

>>59736820
Add clouds to get >460% performance. Kek.

>>59735658
i miss the days where i could watch my cpu+gpu run at 100% to make a gaym look better

>>59735658
Yes.
Either 4 high clocked cores or 6 low clocked cores.
Plus Vega 11 +4GB HBM2.

File: delid-this.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>59735658
DELID THIS YOU INCONSIDERATE SON OF A BITCH

>>59735658
Oy vey, be a good goy and delete this

>>59737777
fuck off reddit nigger. wasting a get like that.