Intel has a three-year advantage on 10nm

>1.7% yields

>>59733423
wew another 15percent performance increase every chip.
truly moore's law in action

>>59733429
you are stupid. it it were 100% they would be out already by everyone and their competitors. of course it's not high yield yet. that's fucking normal.

>>59733441
are you from the 1980s? We haven't seen more than 5% per 1-2 years since the mid 2000s. It's not the 90s anymore.

File: intel-8th-gen.png (3MB, 2742x1536px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2742x1536px

>>59733455
pic related
also im being sarcastic, they only gain these performance increases by small tweaks and increased base clocks.

intel a shit

>>59733423
Is that why it'll only be in laptops

>GloFo expects to have 7 nm process market ready in 2H 2018

File: image.jpg (70KB, 620x464px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 620x464px

>intel roadmaps
>intel performance projections
in the trash it goes.

>>59733455
>are you from the 1980s? We haven't seen more than 5% per 1-2 years since the mid 2000s. It's not the 90s anymore.
ahh, I remember the good old days when each new CPU was much, much faster - not just the same CPU re-branded.

>>59734047
whats wrong?

>>59733423
Oh boy, I can't wait for the Skylake refresh refresh die shrink.

>Intel 9th gen $6000 CPUs released in 3 years will be 20% faster than $100 5th gen CPUs and $200 7th gen
Can't wait

>>59734072
>cannon lake Q2/2016

>>59734162
>caring about the mobile line
But yeah, now i see what you mean, considering we won't get it till Q4/2017 or sometime 2018

Will the next lga socket support more cores?

>>59733423
>claims

>>59734251
It will be BGA only

l heard so pathetic Jewtel will use Radeon instead of their own iGPU.

>>59734251
>Wanting a new socket this badly
good goy

>>59733423
> laid out what it believes is a better metric
"GUYS, our nm are the best according to OUR measurements. Pls adopt this as an industry-wide standard".
I mean, they have the audacity to pull the shit like this while they don't have any new products coming out any time soon.

>>59733423
>three years of 1.7% yields
lmao

>>59733429
>>59734596
I think their prime focus has been reducing power consumption which makes sense because battery technology doesn't advance remotely as fast as processors do. What's the point of making a processor which is 100% faster than the previous gen, which Intel is capable of, if it's just going to last for 5 mins on an average laptop?