Is Windows 10 good for programming and network?

>>59725052
Go away

Shoo underage normie
begone

>>59725052
sure

Your moms dick

>>59725052
Depends on the application.
"Programming and network" are just means to an end and are completely irrelevant on their own.

>>59725052
>programming and network
"good" for programming.
"depends" for network.

For programming, Win10 has access to wide range of tools and platforms, including Windows-exclusive Visual Studio (which is unparalleled in .NET developing) and UWP/WPF.
It also has decent (but still not perfect) support for Unix environment via WSL that's seamlessly paired with the Windows environment without any sorts of VM required.
For example - you can run MySQL server under WSL but connect to localhost via Windows client.
Compared to another "has access to Unix-environment and a dedicated desktop-oriented GUI" OS, which is OSX, Windows has a much better performance under real stress and is capable of effectively using more of its available resources without shitting up the GUI thread.

As for networking - it really depends on what do you mean by "networking". It'll allow you to make a local network, VPN, PPPoE connection - whatever you need. You can make and host working web-applications on it, you can connect to shares and ftps. If that's what you want - yeah, Win10 is good for networking.
However, if it's about more precise tinkering - I can't tell you much, but it isn't really intuitive nor easily configurable.
For example. setting up peer-to-peer WiFi connection on Win7 was a rather straightforward task. Win10 not only has this functionality hidden by default but also requires specifically configured network adapter drivers to be able to use it.

>>59725052
with ConEmu and Visual Studio, programming could be worse on windows.

As for network, I assume you're referring to server-type-things, which as >>59727201 said it depends on the stack you want/need.