[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

How will Drumpf ever recover?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 392
Thread images: 136

How will Drumpf ever recover?
>>
>>59724913
porn sites have always cared about citizens, environments, etc more than government has
>>
>>59724913
>pornhub finally got HTTPS
>all it took was an anti-privacy piece of legislature
what a time to be alive
>>
>>59724913
>living in cuckland
lel
>>
>>59724913
Took them long enough to add fucking HTTPS
>>
So what's the positive angle from Trump with changing these regulations? I get that his other stuff like deporting undesirables and upsetting SJWs is good but this seems like a net loss for citizens.
>>
File: Trump multi-track drifting.png (1MB, 506x629px) Image search: [Google]
Trump multi-track drifting.png
1MB, 506x629px
>>59724913
Remember, Trump plays 45-D chess. He actually is encouraging people to learn about and implement great privacy protections such as using a VPN. The man is a miracle from God.
>>
>>59724913
>publicity stunt to signal
>jewish porn website
really make me think
>>
He really, really, really doesn't want us watching those vids of him drinking russian whore piss.
>>
>>59725008
>liberals
>>
>>59724939
So what? Now your ISP can only sell the duration of your pornsessionsand not the actual video. The data still gives away whether you have problems to get up or finish too fast. You lucky guy, you will get the advertisement or even a sample delivered by mail.
As for the content: Exortic fetishes have special sites anyway.
>>
Meanwhile, 4chan still defaults to unencrypted HTTP.
>>
>>59724939
they've had https for years and years
>>
>>59725068
It doesn't matter. Moot and gook moot give your data directly to three letter agencies anyway.
>>
>>59724913
Fucking lazy faggots, trying to mask the fact they took ages to implement something as basic as https with Donald Trump stupid law.

Just think on how much money those jews make with all the tracking JavaScript and malware they run on their porn sites.
>>
>>59724975
yeah I'm wondering the same thing

What's his justification for this, and how does anyone besides ISPs justify it
>>
>>59725086

i has all your datas?
>>
>>59724913
government legislation of private corporations is bad

trump did the right thing by keeping capitalism alive

ISPs will now compete against eachother, because once one stops selling your data, people will want to switch, so the rest will stop selling your data

besides, if your ISP sees 4chan they already know what kind of porn you watch
>>
>>59724939
>anti-privacy legislature
its not anti privacy legislature, no legislature was passed.

trump just veto'd privacy legislature, things have been the same the whole time
>>
File: Untitled.png (8KB, 872x179px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
8KB, 872x179px
>>59724913
Pornhub fags get btfo on a daily basis by Kot and SpeedyGonzales. Kek
https://forums.lanik.us/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=35443
whole thread is a gold mine of humour.
>>
>>59725162
>ISPs will now compete against eachother, because once one stops selling your data, people will want to switch, so the rest will stop selling your data
Get a load of this faggot. That only works when there is true competition amongst multiple ISPs.
>>
>Trump will take away my privacy!!!!!111
>Has Facebook account and post image from Facebook

SJWs are literally THIS STUPID
>>
>>59724975
It's typical Republican corporatist cocksucking, duh. This is exactly what Trumpsters voted for.

Who cares about consumer rights and civil liberties when there's money to be made?

Remember, corporations are people, and you can't deny them their God-given freedom to fuck you in the ass.
>>
>>59724975
this is what (((they))) want you to think
>>
>>59724978
You jest but /pol/ actually believes this.
>>
>>59725190
This. Retards don't realize that the Obongo measure was only in effect for 4 months. Funny how pornhub didn't give a shit about privacy for the other 8 years of his presidency. Really makes you think.
>>
>>59725282
>Remember, corporations are people

They are. No idea why you would think a collection of people would not have the same rights as they do individually.
>>
>https is hard to implement
>implying Intel, Apple and M$ aren't spying on you anyways
Why are normies so autistic?
>>
Why is it legal for google, microsoft, and facebook to collect and sell your data, but not ok for ISPs? It should be a blanket ban desu.
>>
>>59725364
Except corporations have more rights than the individuals who constitute them.
>>
>>59724913
Wow, turns out this was the solution the whole fucking time. Turns out, you don't need government to force websites not to collect and sell info for it to be a strong selling point.

Capitalism, fucking geniuses.
>>
ISP can still see titles and URL
>>
>>59724975
republicans fucking up what they dont understand
typical
>>
>Porn sites sell user data
>ISP can now get data on ALL websites and sell that data
>Porn sites don't like the idea of ISP cutting them out
>BASED PORN SITES ARE PROTECTING US THANK YOU BASED AF
>>
>>59725383
You can choose to not use any of those sites or services, and block their cookies and tracking scripts across the web. Facebook and Google are not utilities.

Unless you use a VPN, ISPs have a complete view of everything you do online. The only way to opt out is to not have access to the internet.
>>
>>59724913

thanks PornHub
>>
>>59724913

>Drumpf

Die in a fire, faggot.
>>
>>59725526
a bunch of ISPs have come out and said they're not going to sell any data [for now]
>>
>>59725349
So a step in the right direction being thought of but not being taken somehow makes not moving at all acceptable.

What is this stupid defensive logic? Say it like it is.
>>
File: 1437959960601.jpg (51KB, 807x537px) Image search: [Google]
1437959960601.jpg
51KB, 807x537px
>>59724975
Government shouldn't be dictating how markets operate. Companies can either sell your info, or...hey, maybe not sell your info and use that as a selling point for their service? Quite frankly, I wouldn't trust any service where the user is the product.

Besides, free markets did not lead to the telecom monopolies. It was all cronyism and corruption, and now Comcast rules half of the country. And thanks to free markets, there are viable alternatives to Google and Facebook, though the network effect is strong.

Just get government OUT OF THE FUCKING MESS
>>
>>59725542
Picking up easy PR points until it becomes a norm, those marketing people need a pat on the back.
>>
>>59724978
Trump: "I gonna hurt to make you stronger."
>>
File: axd8cxneck1y.png (49KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
axd8cxneck1y.png
49KB, 500x500px
>>59725562
>until it becomes a norm
>>
>>59725159
Moot pls
Tell Google to gimme my datas back faggot
>>
>>59725555
So you don't want to see nutrition information or ingredients of the food as well just to get the government out of the market? ISPs not selling your browser habits is at a similar level. You can opt out of google or facebook, there's no alternative to ISPs.
>>
>>59725190
Although I like the idea of privacy being protected with specific legal language for the internet, these types of protection laws seem to breed a very strong idiot. They are usually sloppy in their implementation and make a strong anti-government regulation argument. Also the more protected people are the more time they have to fantasize about ideological shit and hate people they don't even know based on another absurd bunch of ideas that are equally unworkable if implemented.

It's better to have everyone under brunt of the corporate thirst for your information and desire to narrow you down to a predictable and (they hope) moldable entity.
>>
>>59725591
Shut up and buy Chromebook.
>>
>>59725580
TPP is dead

>>59725591
>alternative to Google
>alternative to Facebook
>>
>>59724913
>offering encryptions
>encryptions
written by a person with Down syndrome

Anyway,how can the isp even see what exactly you're doing online?
I see how the isp can see what server you're communicating with,but isn't the actual traffic encrypted and the traffic key encrypted with the server's public key?
>>
>>59725621
your statement about globalism did, retard
>>
>we have this free market solution that makes us our product better than our competitors
>f-fukcing drumpf! w-we want hillary so the government can charge tax payers 10 billion for this solution we just implemented for 10 dollars
>>
>>59725639
>we have this free market solution that makes us our product better than our competitors
How does it make the product better than competitors?
>>
>>59725611
You can use the internet to a satisfying extent without facebook or google, you can't do that without having an ISP.
>>
>>59725646
T-mobile gives me unlimited data for music that doesn't go against my monthly quota, because I'm a cheap asset that isn't on an unlimited data plan already
>>
>>59725627
>Anyway,how can the isp even see what exactly you're doing online?
>ISP
This is a stupid joke /pol/. Or you forget the VPN or Tor part?
>>
>>59725199
This. In many areas the local government does enforce a monopoly.
>>
>>59724913
Are people so fucking dumb they fall for this shit?

1. These sites have had HTTPS for a long time
2. The FCC regulations were never put into place
3. These sites have ZERO regulation stopping them from massing and selling data and have never advocated for it. They most likely sell that info.

Hopefully all this hysteria leads to all sites getting HTTPS and VPNs becoming competitive and common place
>>
>>59725662
for a large chunk of Internet users that's simply not true. Search and social media dominate most use, and mobile is overtaking traditional ISP use

>>59725667
>abolishing rules that never went into effect
>>
>>59725666
Are vpns worth anon even if I use tor?
>>
There never was a law on the books that prevented this. Also, the FCC ruling states that the FCC cant regulate it and that it is the FTCs problem.
>>
>>59725664
What do you mean? What does that have to do with T-Mobile recording your history and selling personalized ad space?
>>
>>59725162
>keeping capitalism alive
>capitalism is always "good"

>The 265 members of Congress who sold you out to ISPs, and how much it cost to buy them
https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/29/15100620/congress-fcc-isp-web-browsing-privacy-fire-sale

>Members who own AT&T Inc shares: 42
>Members who own Comcast Corp shares: 30
>Members who own Verizon Communications shares: 40
opensecrets.org

This will enable the government to spy on everyone LEGALLY without having to bother with courts or warrants.
>>
>>59725698
>Expecting any politician to have a spine
>>
>>59725687
that's how their service is better than competitors, which is what you were referring to. I don't even know if they are selling data
>>
>>59725712
damage control for what? ISPs have been able to do this the entire time, although many don't
>>
>>59725728
>Implying I was trying to defend him
>Implying that wasn't exactly my point
>>
>>59725591
Yeah, actually. It turns out, if customers demand it enough, an industry could come up with independent, nonprofit orgs to check nutrition info and enforce labeling. Of course, the food industry in the US is a completely socialized and cronyist market that's rigged from the top, but if we made our way back to free markets, that would likely happen.

The ESRB exists. The W3C exists. The MPAA exists. Open industry standards, enforcement, and self-regulation is not only possible, but entirely desirable and has happened many times.
>>
>>59725782
Okay, start the movement, I'll make the logo.
>>
>>59724913
How many Google/Facebook spy bots they have on the website?
>>
>>59725772
How is it bad, especially if they're an ISP who's not even doing it? Multi person households will essentially make everything useless anyway. Don't act like the Democrats are out to save your assets either, Obama easily could have done something about this instead of wasting time with things like tranny bathroom bullshit
>>
File: a.gif (46KB, 278x121px) Image search: [Google]
a.gif
46KB, 278x121px
>>59724913
>that red text
>>
>>59725542
Wrong.

The only thing they've publicly promised not to do is something that is still not legally possible with the rollback of the FCC rules, but that the media kept incorrectly screaming about like fucking idiots.

Under the Telecommunications Act, it's still illegal for ISPs to sell individuals' browsing histories in any identifiable way. That's why attempts to buy and publish Congresspeople's histories are fucking pointless.

What ISPs do -- and will now continue to do -- is gather your browsing data without your consent, and use it to build a very specific demographic profile that they can then sell to advertisers. This profile doesn't have any names or addresses attached to it, but it's a reflection of everything you do online, and your approximate geographic location. ISPs can then insert ads into pages or videos from companies targeting your profile to sell you stuff.

The FCC rules would have made it mandatory for ISPs to make this profiling an opt-in feature, and they would also have had to inform customers of exactly how their data would be used. Now they don't ever have to do either.

tl;dr ISPs' hollow promises are red herrings. You are still being sold out to advertisers.
>>
>>59725788
Cool, I already started it. It was called "Trump 2016" and the logo is now the president.
>>
>>59725782
"Self-regulation" is the biggest fucking meme that has ever existed. All of those bodies you listed have major problems with transparency and are even more full of cronyism than any government body.
>>
>>59725193
Wew, this thread is 2 years old, has 145 pages and is still ongoing, pornhub whining about adblock. They tried to persue adblock to whitelist analytics for them, fucking top kek. Their last post from one week ago is gud.
>Wait, a sticky thread is a bad thing?
>>
>>59725162
The problem is that ISPs have regional monopolies, so there really isn't any competition.
>>
File: 1488232597795.png (66KB, 206x369px) Image search: [Google]
1488232597795.png
66KB, 206x369px
>
>>
File: 1488430646588.png (21KB, 115x140px) Image search: [Google]
1488430646588.png
21KB, 115x140px
>>59725821
noice
>>
>>59725555
"not real capitalism"
>>
>>59725811
He did dumbass, and the republicans blocked it.
And Republicunts were the ones spending all their time writing tranny bathroom laws changing the status quo over the imaginary epidemic of child rapes in bathrooms.
>>
>>59724978
Sounds like your typical Duterte supporter
>>
>>59725803
That's just deflection

Google is hard to avoid, but possible.
I don't have a choice about using an ISP if I want to function in modern society.

It's not a choice between Google and ISP's, That's like saying that If you don't want AIDS, you're supporting herpes.
>>
>>59725685
VPNs and Tor have different objectives... But if you don't trust totally on tor and have 60 bucks to spend well, maybe will be an extra layer of protection (with it own holes).
>>
>>59725829
Sure. Now compare their transparency, corruption, cronyism, and inefficiency to: FCC, FDA, SEC, FDIC, EPA, FEC, etc.

They're not even in the same fucking league.
>>
>>59725820
They'll follow FTC privacy rules. Change your DNS if you don't want them feeding you ads. Blocks hosts on your router. Don't be a cheap ass and get a VPN. Or just go about your day as normal and stop being a delusional retard believing there's any privacy whatsoever on the internet. This is basically nothing compared to the mass data collection by the feds, but hey let's waste time on this and Trump being a big meanie
>>
>>59725905
>implying Google wasn't in bed with Hillary

kys my man
>>
>>59725868
Give me a good argument that buying regional monopoly rights from state and local representatives is capitalism, and I'll change my position.
>>
>>59725920
>Change your DNS if you don't want them feeding you ads.

>implying the ISP can't do a reverse lookup of every IP address you connect to
>>
>>59725880
If only the Democrats would focus on shit that actually matters their party wouldn't be so useless

>>59725958
>Trump
>(((Republicans])))

Yeah they're getting along just peachy, idiot. This is a literal nothing burger, but stay mad

>>59725963
so fucking what. The Internet is widely supported by targeted advertising. Stop using it if you're so butthurt

The number of people crying about this with targeted advertising still activated on their phones is at least half, because people are fucking stupid
>>
If pornhub cared about privacy they would have enabled https years ago. Also they track what you watch by IP. Go on pornhub and look at the recommendations and you'll see all the cuck porn your dad's been watching.
They have a good marketing team though.
>>
>>59725782
>The ESRB exists. The W3C exists. The MPAA exists
This is your defense of capitalism? The largest piece of shit in the /v/irgin industry behind Ubisoft, the largest piece of shit in the world of Web Development which can be blamed for webdev's awfulness, and a god damn group of retarded soccer moms deciding ratings using a broken nonsense system that degrades society and culture as a whole?
>>
>>59726045
Why would I be mad, I'm smart enough to watch all my porn behind a VPN
>>
File: a.png (20KB, 786x213px) Image search: [Google]
a.png
20KB, 786x213px
>>59725193
>>59725832
cuckhub deliberately broke youtubedl and makes videos not load if you use adblock. fuck them.
>>
>>59726069
I didn't say they were perfect. But they are subject to more pressures than the alternative government agencies. At least you can walk into the W3C and make a good argument as to why JavaScript is shit. Oh, wait, they're already working on a replacement. Wonder if that would've happened if the Federal Web Standards Agency were fucking running the show.
>>
>>59726123
I don't think this is bad at all, so again, why would I be mad? Oh wait, that's right, because you and everyone crying about this is retarded
>>
File: 1486066537628.jpg (88KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]
1486066537628.jpg
88KB, 1024x682px
Wait, so why didn't they do this when Snowden and Wikileaks revealed that the Obama administration tracks and saves all our online activity permanently?

Hmm, does this porn company *actually* care about our privacy? Or do they merely hate Republicans? Makes you wonder.
>>
>>59725072
Nope. Some yes. But pornhub didn't till recently.
>>
File: 1439360253001.jpg (189KB, 878x599px) Image search: [Google]
1439360253001.jpg
189KB, 878x599px
>>59726173
>Hmm, does this porn company *actually* care about our privacy? Or do they merely hate Republicans? Makes you wonder.

Hmmm. Certainly boggles your noodle.
>>
>>59726172
Those two options aren't mutually exclusive. The government already takes everything without warrant, regardless of what the ISPs are doing. And that is exponentially more worrisome than an ISP doing targeted advertising.
>>
>>59726173
They didn't do it then because normies don't give a shit about wikileaks and snowden. They get more publicity by doing it now.
>>
>>59725907
What are g approved ? Should I go with European they can't get my info then right?
>>
>>59726232
>because the media covered it up for Obama and these (((porn companies))) want to coordinate with the media

thats what you meant to say right?
>>
>>59726279
You can't lose what you never had in the first place, literally nothing changes. But again, I already take preventative measures like blocking advertising at every possible venue and have a VPN subscription. I would rather not have the government get even further involved with my Internet, unless they're going to step in and break of regional monopolies.
>>
>>59726279
>i stomp my feet when the media tells m too
>fighting back

let me guess youre going to be anti war now too after 8 years of zero protests against obamas 10 wars?
>>
>>59724975
It's not really ``Trump" doing this, it's more the GOP as a whole doing it now that they run the country. The President doesn't do everything, you know. It basically comes down to most of them being a bunch of old men who don't know anything about technology and think ``less restrictions on corporations == good", without really being aware of specifics. And, a lot of them are supporting it just because the other side is against it. Their reasoning is ``well the left supports corrupt politicians and net neutrality, so if we want to drain the swamp we better get rid of net neutrality too."
>>
>>59725162
Doesn't work when there's only one real ISP in your area. Then you're going to have to boycott them and go without internet at all for a few years until some new ISP enters the region.
>>
>drumpf

I'm not a Trump supporter by any stretch of the imagination but I really wish people would stop saying this. It's not even because you're making fun of him. I couldn't give less of a shit. If you're going to insult him just make it something actually funny/good. "Drumpf" is so fucking retarded.
>>
>>59726486
net neutrality is just government overreach for the benefit of Netflix and YouTube hogging all the data
>>
File: 1486314744995.png (400KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
1486314744995.png
400KB, 600x600px
>>59726523
level up homo
>>
>>59725664
I don't benefit from that though. Why should I be in favor of this?
>>
>>59726554
>Trump supported the Iraw war then lied about being against it
with this youve confirmed youre a basic koolaid drinker. also it doesnt matter if he was for or against it, because he was just some guy selling property.
>>
>>59726554
My ISP doesn't sell anything, and data collection for things I don't want them to see is easy to circumvent. I am very much in favor of getting warrants, but not delusional enough to believe that actually happens.

>>59726578
If you have AT&T, you can watch DirectTV on your phone without is counting against your data. If you implement net neutrality, both of those consumer perks go away under the guise of ALL DATA IS EQUAL, which simply isn't true.
>>
>>59726416
>accuses others of being brainwashed by media
>post contains nothing but projection and unoriginal memes
>>
>>59726605
>If you have AT&T
I don't, though.
>>
I can understand why the government and the corporate spy agencies like oogle and the book of faces wants to destroy privacy, but why isn't free software fighting this?
We put so god damn many eggs in one basket that the only major browser We have is Firefox.
And Firefox still don't do their job when it comes to internet security.
Why don't they give a similar warning to when a site has an invalid certificate to users when there is no tls encryption?
They have the power to bully people into obedience, so why don't they?
Google and Microsoft have enforced how your email should be setup so it doesn't appear as spam, why can't we do the same to websites?
There is no excuse anymore.
Maybe a decade ago there were reasons to skip it, but today it is just irresponsible.
And users need to be the ones who get beaten in the face for the crimes of the sites they visit.
It is the only way to make them change.
>>
>>59726633
then stop trying to take away my free shit you goon
>>
>>59726617
wow i never thought about it that way! thanks 80 IQ guy. im sure that seemed logical in your head.
>>
>>59724913
Who runs these shitty sites anyway?
>>
Is HTTPS really all you need to stop ISPs?
>>
>>59726643
Mozilla is now funded almost entirely by a Verizon subsidy. They are powerless.
>>
>>59726700
No. They still process DNS request and can see header titles and URLs, they just can see the actual content in transit is all
>>
>>59726676
>im sure that seemed logical in your head.
Yeah I'm sure the script your handlers gave you did too.
>>
>>59726712
*can't see
>>
>>59726726
he also said on Howard Stern that he'd be fine with Ivanka dating a nigger, but he's literally Hitler amirite
>>
>>59726704
*subsidiary

Goddamnit.
>>
>>59726768
>what is a joke
>>
>>59726742
I don't think it would have been bad if passed, but also don't think the world is ending because it got shot down. Anytime more government and bureaucracy get involved, nothing good comes of it
>>
Welcome to 2017 America, where less regulation government intervention is oppression!
>>
File: race and arrests.png (204KB, 1715x1091px) Image search: [Google]
race and arrests.png
204KB, 1715x1091px
>>59725882
>oh no not the poor criminal scum and shitbags!
kek
fuck off heroine-addicted nigger
>>
File: race and arrests 2.png (166KB, 1328x908px) Image search: [Google]
race and arrests 2.png
166KB, 1328x908px
>>
File: race and crime rate country.png (117KB, 1531x841px) Image search: [Google]
race and crime rate country.png
117KB, 1531x841px
>>
>>59724945
TITS OR GTFO
>>
>>
File: race and firearm homicides.png (25KB, 597x441px) Image search: [Google]
race and firearm homicides.png
25KB, 597x441px
>>
File: race and homicide in ma.jpg (163KB, 943x491px) Image search: [Google]
race and homicide in ma.jpg
163KB, 943x491px
>>
>>59726726
>It doesn't matter what his job was back then, he went on the Howard Stern show and publically supported the Iraq war, then lied about supporting it.
in that case youre just proving youre a political hack repeating talking points because what actually happened is that it was a random and totally irrelevant question that he hadnt thought about or studies since hes just a real estate guy, and hesitantly he said "well i guess sure" or something to that effect, and other people he spoke to at the time said he debated it with him and argued against it. to peddle such a childish attack when obama and friends literally lie all day every day, it shows you dont have a single ounce of integrity, i really hope you havent convinced yourself that you do.
>>
>>
>>
>>59726882
>>59726898
>>59726913
>>59726929
>>59726934
>>59726943
stop
>>
>>
>>59726802
>he was only pretending

>>59726854
>>59726871
>>59726882
>>59726913
>>59726929
>>59726934
>>59726943
Back to your containment board.
>>>/pol/
>>
>>
File: race and poverty.png (251KB, 1700x2200px) Image search: [Google]
race and poverty.png
251KB, 1700x2200px
>>
File: race and skin color 2.jpg (97KB, 600x1000px) Image search: [Google]
race and skin color 2.jpg
97KB, 600x1000px
>>
File: race and skin color.jpg (41KB, 668x354px) Image search: [Google]
race and skin color.jpg
41KB, 668x354px
>>
File: race and socioeconomic status.png (1003KB, 807x2348px) Image search: [Google]
race and socioeconomic status.png
1003KB, 807x2348px
>>59726957
>>59726967
>n-no d-dont...!
> : )
>>
>>59726967
>implying you wouldn't

fag
>>
File: race and welfare rate.jpg (72KB, 600x525px) Image search: [Google]
race and welfare rate.jpg
72KB, 600x525px
>>
File: race best picture nig.jpg (157KB, 633x1812px) Image search: [Google]
race best picture nig.jpg
157KB, 633x1812px
>>
>>59726712
Couldn't you just use DNSCrypt?
>>
>>
File: race black stats.png (130KB, 1024x896px) Image search: [Google]
race black stats.png
130KB, 1024x896px
>>
>>59726854
>>59726871
>>59726882
>>59726898
>>59726913
>>59726929
>>59726934
>>59726943
>>59726956
>>59726961
>>59726968
>>59726978
>>59726983
>>59726999
>>59727004
>>59727014
>>59727018
>>59727031
>>59727037
Congratulations, your off-topic spam is now over 10% of the posts in this thread. I hope you're happy.
>>
File: race breed norman french.png (15KB, 1291x491px) Image search: [Google]
race breed norman french.png
15KB, 1291x491px
>>
File: race captain phillips european.jpg (31KB, 478x350px) Image search: [Google]
race captain phillips european.jpg
31KB, 478x350px
>>
>>59726871
>>59726882
>>59726898
Gee, it's almost like centuries-old civil and institutional oppression against a particular demographic could have consequences or something.
>>
File: race donation to africa.jpg (81KB, 890x317px) Image search: [Google]
race donation to africa.jpg
81KB, 890x317px
>>
>>59727046
>>59727058
>Gee, it's almost like centuries-old civil and institutional oppression against a particular demographic could have consequences or something.
you mean it lowered their IQ by 15 points? Guess we need to institute some eugenics programs then :^)
>>
File: race crime correlation.jpg (75KB, 1024x430px) Image search: [Google]
race crime correlation.jpg
75KB, 1024x430px
>>
>>59727059
t. nigger
>>
File: race crime income.png (109KB, 761x689px) Image search: [Google]
race crime income.png
109KB, 761x689px
>>59727058
niggers are not oppressed
meanwhile Asians get off of the boat and turn into doctors in 2-3 generations
stop making excuses cuck faggot
>>
>>59725282
>It's typical Republican corporatist cocksucking
just say typical government corporatist cocksucking

don't pretend that Obamacare is anything other than the greatest corporatist legiislation ever passed
>>
File: race crime slashing.jpg (342KB, 964x1197px) Image search: [Google]
race crime slashing.jpg
342KB, 964x1197px
>>
File: jlaw_thumbs_up.gif (915KB, 245x285px) Image search: [Google]
jlaw_thumbs_up.gif
915KB, 245x285px
>>59727058
>>
File: race cultural differences.jpg (303KB, 678x960px) Image search: [Google]
race cultural differences.jpg
303KB, 678x960px
>>
>>59727087
>don't pretend that Obamacare is anything other than the greatest corporatist legiislation ever passed

Only because the Republicans had a hand in it. :^)
>>
File: race human.png (585KB, 889x613px) Image search: [Google]
race human.png
585KB, 889x613px
>>
File: race firearm homicide 2.jpg (46KB, 718x575px) Image search: [Google]
race firearm homicide 2.jpg
46KB, 718x575px
>>
>>59727068
>institutional oppression caused a drop in IQ
>therefore eugenics is the answer
So basically, rather than actually recognize the causes of a problem, and seek to prevent the same problem from recurring again in the future, you seek to do some totally lolrandom thing?
>>
>>
File: 1461932640902.jpg (285KB, 800x1300px) Image search: [Google]
1461932640902.jpg
285KB, 800x1300px
>>59726871
>>59726882
>>
>>59727117
he's making fun of you retard
>>
File: race hp lovecraft niggers.png (134KB, 818x434px) Image search: [Google]
race hp lovecraft niggers.png
134KB, 818x434px
>>59727117
IQ is a consequence of your genes, you stupid fuck. You're claiming that their IQ is caused by "institutional oppression", and the implication there is that this oppression has resulted in breeding patterns that produce dumber people. The only solution is thus to work toward producing more intelligent people.

>y-yeah it's dysgenic because...
>omg eugenics is a naughty word don't talk about it
>>
File: race human resources.jpg (145KB, 1024x1552px) Image search: [Google]
race human resources.jpg
145KB, 1024x1552px
>>
>>59727140
>implying I'm a Republican
>>
>>59727093
Nice sources, faggot.

>>59727105
Subspecies isn't a meaningful or well-defined term. If they're capable of interbreeding, they're the same species for all intents and purposes.
>>
File: race hurdles.jpg (92KB, 600x570px) Image search: [Google]
race hurdles.jpg
92KB, 600x570px
>>59727125
jesus christ thank you
I have been looking for a high-res version of this
>>
File: race in humans.png (417KB, 956x863px) Image search: [Google]
race in humans.png
417KB, 956x863px
>>
File: race native americans.jpg (174KB, 650x813px) Image search: [Google]
race native americans.jpg
174KB, 650x813px
>>
File: race let's go be oppressed.png (213KB, 500x379px) Image search: [Google]
race let's go be oppressed.png
213KB, 500x379px
>>
>>59727176
I love Trump and completely despise both parties and most politicians in general
>>
>>59727165
>ignore everything else in the thread
mad nigger/numale beta cuck detected
>>
All these statistics prove is that racism is still inherent in modern american society.
>>
File: race iq scores 2.jpg (50KB, 427x567px) Image search: [Google]
race iq scores 2.jpg
50KB, 427x567px
>>
>>
>>59727209
>facts are racist
>>
calling mods
>>
>>59727209
>being born with a low IQ proves racism
interesting theory, please elaborate
>>
>a thread turns into race realism and IQ/crime stastics no matter what board it's on

4chan circa 2016
>>
>>59727220
>all-night is a thing you guys
>>
File: race, violence, and iq.jpg (2MB, 3428x2888px) Image search: [Google]
race, violence, and iq.jpg
2MB, 3428x2888px
>>
>>59727149
>implication there is that this oppression has resulted in breeding patterns that produce dumber people
It is possible, ``oppression" depending on what specifically you mean by that can create selective pressures that cause people to change their dating preferences. But regardless, nobody in this thread implied that in the first place, they merely reject the juvenile notion that oppression can have zero effect on IQ scores.

>The only solution is thus to work toward producing more intelligent people.
>>omg eugenics is a naughty word don't talk about it
So basically you don't believe reproduction is a human right? You're basically a collectivist, as much as you surely loathe the term.
>>
>>59727218
Increased incarceration rates and a less chance of getting into medical school can be explained by the prejudice people have towards blacks.
>>
>>59727238
You mean like when he stood up for gay marriage at the convention?
>>
File: race negro heatmap.jpg (812KB, 1012x1474px) Image search: [Google]
race negro heatmap.jpg
812KB, 1012x1474px
>>59727209
>>
File: race seniors shitpost.jpg (264KB, 742x960px) Image search: [Google]
race seniors shitpost.jpg
264KB, 742x960px
>>59727243
I typed up a response but it got deleted by 4chanX
tl;dr: I don't care what you're babbling on about and I'm here to do one thing: demonstrate that niggers are biologically inferior to white people on average. 12% of the US population—niggers—commit about 50% of the most heinous violent crime. Simple as that.
>>
>>59727244
16% of the population is responsible the majority of homicides. There's nothing institutional about niggers being niggers

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
>>
File: race statistics du.gif (1MB, 616x5370px) Image search: [Google]
race statistics du.gif
1MB, 616x5370px
>>
File: race species shitposting.jpg (19KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
race species shitposting.jpg
19KB, 480x480px
>>
>>59727261
I go to /fa/ and get it in threads where nobody even brings up race

I go to /vg/ and it happens in generals where nobody brings up race

people act like feminism and sjws invade every part of their lives and I can't find that shit anywhere except tumblr but this shit is literally in every 4chan board, subreddit, and discord I go on im so over it
>>
File: race shitposting first they came.jpg (251KB, 1067x696px) Image search: [Google]
race shitposting first they came.jpg
251KB, 1067x696px
>>59727289
>>59727289

STOP BEING RACIST YOU FUCKING RACIST
RRRRRAAAAAAAAAYYYCIIIIIIISSSST!

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
File: race social construct form.png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]
race social construct form.png
1MB, 1440x2560px
>>
>>59727282
And?
>>
File: race socioeconomic.png (976KB, 962x2179px) Image search: [Google]
race socioeconomic.png
976KB, 962x2179px
>>59727307
I don't care about Donald Duck or you, faggot
>>
File: race violence by city.jpg (399KB, 1099x3082px) Image search: [Google]
race violence by city.jpg
399KB, 1099x3082px
>>
>>
File: race, brazilian intelligence.jpg (35KB, 703x485px) Image search: [Google]
race, brazilian intelligence.jpg
35KB, 703x485px
>>
wondering how much how polposting is just russian paid shills like the fbi said they find
>>
File: race, white v black crime.png (12KB, 446x401px) Image search: [Google]
race, white v black crime.png
12KB, 446x401px
>>
>>59727341
Did you pay attention to the last 18 months at all?
>>
>>
File: rachel maddow.png (199KB, 956x313px) Image search: [Google]
rachel maddow.png
199KB, 956x313px
>>
>>59727203
I'm not obligated to reply to all your spam just to appease your autism. Besides, if you had any good arguments, you wouldn't need to spam.

>>59727218
Facts aren't, but the interpretation of facts can be.

>>59727232
No one is born with any kind of IQ, it doesn't exist until you take an IQ test. It's just a measurement. It's like saying "you are born with losing your virginity at 22". You can be born with a biological predisposition that influences your intellectual development, but that's not the same as being "born with a low IQ".

>>59727239
Some people identify as such.

>>59727240
This just looks like bad science to me. The facts presented are:
>Blacks are more likely to commit violent crime
>Blacks are more likely to have the 2-repeat allele of the MAOA gene
So basically it's a classic case of using correlation to imply causation. If the implied causation was "being black makes you predisposed to violent crime", that would at least be supported, albeit not conclusively, by the evidence. But now they're saying that MAOA 2-repeat CAUSES violent crime, simply because it's common in blacks.
>>
>>59727359
>Moooom can't you see I'm trying to redpill all the sheeple!!
>>
>>59727347
>much Russia boogeyman

you are like a little child
>>
File: racism asian.jpg (394KB, 700x735px) Image search: [Google]
racism asian.jpg
394KB, 700x735px
>>59727359
I don't know who you are and I don't care if I change your mind, and in fact you seem fairly open to my ideas already, so I care even less

>>59727375
>No one is born with any kind of IQ
top kek, we've got a real science denier over here, boyos
>>
>>59724913
>offers https
>claims to be fighting gubbamints
please, encryption should be standard
>>
>>59727375
>No one is born with any kind of IQ
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
.........AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>59727383
Not as many who went after and attacked him
>>
>>
File: racism.jpg (274KB, 976x642px) Image search: [Google]
racism.jpg
274KB, 976x642px
>>
File: racist pbj.jpg (75KB, 620x408px) Image search: [Google]
racist pbj.jpg
75KB, 620x408px
>>
>>59727270
Seems too scattered with different variables to really be saying anything about race. Because look, the area with low completion rates, is high in black population, AIDS rate, obesity, and low in HDI. But it doesn't really show any correlation or any definite pattern between race, isolated as an independent variable, any any particular other statistic.

>>59727283
>12% of the US population—niggers—commit about 50% of the most heinous violent crime.
And I'm not denying what the statistic says. I'm merely questioning the validity of the assumptions as to the cause.
>>
File: racists stupid.png (2MB, 1504x1488px) Image search: [Google]
racists stupid.png
2MB, 1504x1488px
>>
>>59727375
>interpretation of facts

explain the 'Y' chromosome to us again
>>
File: rakim oakland 2.jpg (18KB, 500x205px) Image search: [Google]
rakim oakland 2.jpg
18KB, 500x205px
>>
>>59727385
t. Vasily
4.53₽ rubles have been deposited into your account
>>
File: racist gardening.jpg (247KB, 866x899px) Image search: [Google]
racist gardening.jpg
247KB, 866x899px
>>59727423
>And I'm not denying what the statistic says. I'm merely questioning the validity of the assumptions as to the cause.
there are no ASSUMPTIONS, they have an average IQ of 85 and are proven to commit this crime and the correlation between race and crime is far stronger than the correlation between income and crime, deal with it cuck faggot

>>59727439
that's nice dear
>>
>>59727417
Yes, he had the glowing support of the GOP the entire time. No talk of contested conventions or anything like that. Fucking idiot
>>
File: 1467975057310.jpg (60KB, 480x486px) Image search: [Google]
1467975057310.jpg
60KB, 480x486px
I am curious to see what happens after he gets voted out in 2020. The GOP was given fucking everything and they've done nothing but make themselves look like incompetent fools for the past 3 months.

Assuming he's killed net neutrality and assuming that ISP's do their gay bullshit, and assuming there's a backlash from consumers, I wonder how much shit of his would be rolled back by the dem who gets in. I don't think alot of people would be happy paying for website subscriptions, throttled speeds and bandwidth on certain sites, and blacklisted sites on top of their already high bill here in the US.

The worst thing about this entire issue is that people don't even realize that the shit it going on, and alot of people who do don't even give a fuck. I know people hate using the slippery slope bullshit, but this kind of shit does really set a precedent.

My life is so damn pathetic that the only issue that I give a fuck about in politics is a free and open internet. I don't care about abortion, gay rights, or any of that shit. The only things that affect me are the economy and my internet.
>>
>>59727305
>pic
Sounds like someone doesn't understand fascism. It needs an enemy to scapegoat. If they had managed to wipe out the Jews and the Communists, they'd still have to find some other group to turn on. Because that's the only way their leaders could stay in power, by convincing the people that giving up their individual freedoms was necessary to defend against an external threat. Had Germany won the war, it would only be a matter of time before people started finding out about the horrors of the Holocaust and saying what the Nazi government did was wrong, and women would start demanding equal rights and opportunities.
>>
File: uSym8da.jpg (109KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]
uSym8da.jpg
109KB, 720x720px
>>
File: racist normie memes.jpg (35KB, 600x368px) Image search: [Google]
racist normie memes.jpg
35KB, 600x368px
>>
File: racist and sexist histrionic.gif (722KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]
racist and sexist histrionic.gif
722KB, 245x245px
>>59727454
it's just a humorous image you autistic faggot
>>
>>59727445
just admit Hillary was a shit candidate and stop deflecting. Or don't, the Democratic Party is dead soon anyway
>>
File: black white iq distributions.jpg (37KB, 655x481px) Image search: [Google]
black white iq distributions.jpg
37KB, 655x481px
>>
File: black crime stats unchecked.png (551KB, 1000x822px) Image search: [Google]
black crime stats unchecked.png
551KB, 1000x822px
>>
File: ZaQLf8I.jpg (61KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]
ZaQLf8I.jpg
61KB, 540x960px
>>
File: cyberpunk.jpg (411KB, 1280x1256px) Image search: [Google]
cyberpunk.jpg
411KB, 1280x1256px
>>59727451
forget dems and forget repubs
Private Sector always wins in the end chummer
are you ready to fight back against the corps? theyre the real ones to beat
>>
>>59727464
>tfw you'll never get to face fuck her
why live?
>>
File: black heatmap 2.gif (26KB, 567x473px) Image search: [Google]
black heatmap 2.gif
26KB, 567x473px
>>
File: 1489655107626.gif (930KB, 220x165px) Image search: [Google]
1489655107626.gif
930KB, 220x165px
>>59727451
you know what they say about assuming
>>
File: black SNSD jenny hyun.jpg (343KB, 1109x1355px) Image search: [Google]
black SNSD jenny hyun.jpg
343KB, 1109x1355px
>>
>>59724913
Why are people so fucking stupid? The FCC regulations were in effect for 3 FUCKING MONTHS, everything before then was exactly the same as how it's going to be now.
>>
File: c359gr7booey.jpg (80KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]
c359gr7booey.jpg
80KB, 450x600px
>>
File: black american vs african stats.jpg (77KB, 510x800px) Image search: [Google]
black american vs african stats.jpg
77KB, 510x800px
>>59727423
>West Virginia is one of the poorest and whitest states in the union
>relatively low murder rate
>meanwhile niggers
>>
>>59727447
The justice system deals with criminals fairly well.
>>
File: black criminal starter pack.jpg (44KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
black criminal starter pack.jpg
44KB, 480x480px
>>59727509
Source or GTFO
>>
>>59727454
kinda how liberals go after whites?
>>
>>59727469
Hilary was shit, russia has good disinformation ops going, and democrats are nearly extinct

all these things are facts youre correct
>>
File: black breeding patterns.jpg (2MB, 2432x4320px) Image search: [Google]
black breeding patterns.jpg
2MB, 2432x4320px
>>
>>59724913
i dont live in USA but im interested and google as usual dont helps with this thing, anyone can explain this to me?
or at least a quick resume
>>
File: black chicken.gif (2MB, 250x320px) Image search: [Google]
black chicken.gif
2MB, 250x320px
>>59727521
>The justice system deals with criminals fairly well.
yes it is indeed fine
>b-but we need to legalize marijuana so Jamal doesn't get stuck in prison despite the fact that it's his fifth offense and the MJ charge pads his assault and robbery time out to 20 years instead of 6 months and probation
dumbasses
>>
>>59727352
Would be more meaningful if you also had white-on-white and black-on-black crime. And other race combinations too, if it's not counting everyone as either black or white.

>>59727358
Funny, I went to public school and was never called a racist.

>>59727386
>top kek, we've got a real science denier over here, boyos
IQ is literally just a measurement. Again, I didn't deny that there is a biological predisposition to intelligence, just that saying "born with an IQ" is making you look like an idiot.

>>59727395
See above. "There are innate race differences in intelligence" does not imply that "you are born with IQ."
>>
File: black doll.webm (908KB, 405x720px) Image search: [Google]
black doll.webm
908KB, 405x720px
>>
>>59727527
Christie was the first one to endorse him you. There are still a bunch of fox people who hate him. But yeah John McCain and Lindsay Graham are sure helping a ton
>>
File: interracial murders 2015.jpg (2MB, 5136x2736px) Image search: [Google]
interracial murders 2015.jpg
2MB, 5136x2736px
>>59727552
>Would be more meaningful if you also had white-on-white and black-on-black crime
>>
File: black heatmap 1.jpg (177KB, 874x528px) Image search: [Google]
black heatmap 1.jpg
177KB, 874x528px
>>59727552
>just that saying "born with an IQ" is making you look like an idiot
Every cognitively normal person approaching this discussion in good faith inherently understands that we're discussing intelligence, being needlessly pedantic to the point where you're no longer even speaking accurately doesn't make you clever or prove any points whatsoever.

tl;dr: you're not as clever as you think you are, fuck off you stupid cunt
>>
File: image_0.jpg (169KB, 884x1052px) Image search: [Google]
image_0.jpg
169KB, 884x1052px
>>59727532
>russia has good disinformation ops
>>
>>59727538
>great-great-great grandchildren
Jesus. My great-grandma died in her 90s with no great-great grandkids because none of us were old enough to have our own kids yet. She was blind and basically deaf but always so happy to visit with us and just the sweetest woman you'd ever meet.
>>
File: black heatmap 3.png (160KB, 950x766px) Image search: [Google]
black heatmap 3.png
160KB, 950x766px
>>
>>
File: black kangz and fuck statistics.jpg (182KB, 1064x1042px) Image search: [Google]
black kangz and fuck statistics.jpg
182KB, 1064x1042px
>>59727587
>19-year-old cunt who reads poetry thinks he's intelligent and was buttblasted enough by this post to cap and repost it, thinking he's proving a point
kek you are so god damn stupid
>>
File: black lesbian identity.jpg (143KB, 750x721px) Image search: [Google]
black lesbian identity.jpg
143KB, 750x721px
>>
>>59727562
>dylann roof and some other guy where the only white people to kill blacks in 2015

sigh its so heavyhanded id be willing to debate without such obvious propaganda lol
>>
>>
Stormnigger folder dumpers go back to >>>/pol/
>>
>>59724975

Because it rightfully reverts the FCC's power grab on the internet? They declared they had the power to regulate the internet under a 1934 law without the approval of Congress, and Congress has every right to stop it.

The FCC is not and was never your friend. They simply wanted to impose popular regulations now to set the precedent for their control so they can start imposing censorship later.
>>
>>59727431
The interpretation is whether the Y chromosome itself, in the absence of a male phenotype, is sufficient to classify someone as being biologically (not merely genetically) male.
>>
I came into this thread because I wanted any advice on how to avoid this bullshit but I guess /pol/s here so bye
>>
>>
File: black knight.png (219KB, 643x507px) Image search: [Google]
black knight.png
219KB, 643x507px
>>59727612
>everything that disagrees with my worldview is propaganda
sorry bud but virtually all of the hard evidence bolsters my position

you have... what... what your kike sociology 101 professor taught you at your shitty community college?
>>
File: black lives matter copy.jpg (929KB, 840x3733px) Image search: [Google]
black lives matter copy.jpg
929KB, 840x3733px
>>59727631
>Why do you think reading books is bad?
please see >>59727441

it's racist. Stop oppressing niggers you shitlord
>>
>>59727588
>>(and everything else)
This is the best thread on /g/ in months.

Any chance you would mind uploading your source folder to Mega or something? It's a bitch trying to manually copy your filenames, which are excellent in terms of finding what you want, and I'm saving all this shit.

But of course, please don't let that stop the flow.
>>
File: black lives matter.jpg (63KB, 1032x292px) Image search: [Google]
black lives matter.jpg
63KB, 1032x292px
>>
>>59727656
>>>/pol/
>>
File: black ninjas.jpg (167KB, 980x752px) Image search: [Google]
black ninjas.jpg
167KB, 980x752px
>>
>>59727607
every Republican in my state disavowed after the pussy tapes, along with many more. Stop acting like he has unanimous Republican support, because that is the furthest thing from the truth
>>
>>59727678
>best this triggered cuck can come up with is gradeschool name-calling
sorry bud but there's a good chance I've been married longer than you've been out of puberty
>>
>>59727637
no the problem is that picture is obviously cherrypicked funposting, am I supposed to believe dylann roof and some other white guy I can't recognize are the ONLY white people to kill black people in america in 2015?

I didn't even imply that all those blacks didn't kill whites but please, I don't know why I'm actually responding I don't think you want to do anything but shitpost so eh guess I am dumb
>>
>>59727622
b-b-but I thought the science was settled
>>
File: dindu nuffin.jpg (1MB, 917x4143px) Image search: [Google]
dindu nuffin.jpg
1MB, 917x4143px
>>59727699
>I am dumb
yep
>>
>>59727624
change your DNS, block ads everywhere, pony up for a VPN
>>
File: islam racists.jpg (103KB, 1160x420px) Image search: [Google]
islam racists.jpg
103KB, 1160x420px
>>
File: islam republican 2.jpg (172KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
islam republican 2.jpg
172KB, 960x960px
>>
>>59727704
So what? I'm supposed to love all Republicans unconditionally now because he ran and won as a Republican?
>>
File: islamophobia.jpg (98KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
islamophobia.jpg
98KB, 800x600px
>>
File: Cuck.jpg (439KB, 1200x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Cuck.jpg
439KB, 1200x1000px
>>59727696
>complains about name calling while spouting the cuck meme
Post your wedding ring + time stamp.
>>
File: islamophobia 2.jpg (225KB, 1465x638px) Image search: [Google]
islamophobia 2.jpg
225KB, 1465x638px
>>
>>59727718
>>59727624
/thread
>>
>>59727743
Please see since you probably missed it
>>59727656
Don't let the knowledge stop.
>>
File: islamophobia sweden multiculti.jpg (183KB, 801x906px) Image search: [Google]
islamophobia sweden multiculti.jpg
183KB, 801x906px
>>
>>59727742
No, you just lose the ability to say you hate the Republican party in general when you admit you love their highest and most powerful member.
>>
>>59727516
It also has a lower population density than most of the areas which are known for black crime. Generally speaking, high rates of violent crime are an urban problem. You'd need to rule the population density out to isolate race as the IV.

>>59727530
Liberals are doing a very poor job of it in that case. If they were elected to ``solve the white problem", they'd be voted out of office pretty quickly for being so ineffective at it.

>>59727550
I think weed is dumb but honestly do you really think it's worth sending people to jail for? I mean that all comes out of the taxpayer's pocket after all, wouldn't you rather save the money to jail those who are a serious danger to society, like murderers and rapists? If the sentence for violent crime is too short, then honestly the solution is to push for harsher sentences for those crimes, rather than counting on drug offenses to ``pad out" the sentence.

>>59727562
You're just doubling down on the same incomplete statistics, rather than providing the additional information I requested. Also, what the hell are those iamges even supposed to mean? They appear to include at least some blacks on both sides, so are you mixing the killers and the victims? Not to mention, there appear to be some obvious duplicates.

>>59727571
Then you should be saying intelligence. By using IQ and intelligence synonymously, you're demanding everyone else in the discussion agree to the unproven assertion that IQ is a perfectly accurate measure of intelligence. That's just bad faith arguing, requiring everyone to agree to your premise before they're even allowed to enter discussion.
>>
>>59727759
Can we please nuke Sweden? Please. They are beyond saving.
>>
>>59727764
I can hate whoever I want, thank you very much
>>
>>59727788
And I, and most other normies, can call you a hypocrite because of it.
>>
>>59727767
>It also has a lower population density than most of the areas which are known for black crime
you are grasping at straws
>if you put niggers in a small space they commit more crime!
ok and? got a follow-up, dumbfuck?
>>
>>59727758
>>59727656
sorry, friend, I cannot
>>
>>59727793
I never voted Republican before Trump, there's nothing hypocritical at all about like Trump but disliking the Republican party. They're still infested with corporate shills and globalism interests which are adamantly against Trump's agenda.
>>
File: muslims counting sheep.jpg (33KB, 650x420px) Image search: [Google]
muslims counting sheep.jpg
33KB, 650x420px
>>
>>59727808
Okay, you've compared race versus wealth AND race versus population density - but you have yet to have one that shows violent crime by race when BOTH wealth and population density have been adjusted for. That's all I'm asking.
>>
File: muslim jihadis.jpg (115KB, 960x798px) Image search: [Google]
muslim jihadis.jpg
115KB, 960x798px
>>
File: muslim terrorism car.jpg (74KB, 750x518px) Image search: [Google]
muslim terrorism car.jpg
74KB, 750x518px
>>59727832
I don't think I have anything specific unless you see it ITT, but if you're genuinely interested then compare both NCVS data and FBI stats, it'll shed more light on this topic
>>
>>59727817
Thanks for the contributions in the thread. MUCH appreciated and almost all saved for investigation.

The science you posted is close enough to technology for me.
>>
File: muslim.jpg (75KB, 960x721px) Image search: [Google]
muslim.jpg
75KB, 960x721px
>>59727832
>but you have yet to have one that shows violent crime by race when BOTH wealth and population density have been adjusted for. That's all I'm asking
Oh, this is in The Color of Crime
>population density has been adjusted for
it's per-capita crime, so yes

http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2005-Color-of-Crime-Report.pdf

there's also a new revised edition out and I posted excerpts in this thread.
>>
>>59727832
>pls show me stats where niggers aren't murderous animals
>>
>>59727857
see >>59727867

also https://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/
>>
>>59727832
Blacks are poor everywhere because they are less intelligent on average which determines their individual life outcomes.
>>
>>
>>59727879
I voted for John Kerry then sat out the next two elections. I'm all for gutting the federal government
>>
Remember, fellow cuckolds: Always maintain solidarity with your fellow human beings, even if they are niggers. Wu Tang out.
>>
>>59727881
>>59727832
>>
>>59727938
How so
>>
>>59727873
I'm just asking for conclusive data. If you're unwilling to provide it, that implies that the real data doesn't support your agenda, and all your "evidence" depends on twisting the data to imply something that isn't true.
>>
File: once you go black.jpg (364KB, 1200x782px) Image search: [Google]
once you go black.jpg
364KB, 1200x782px
>>
>>59727958
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
>>
File: diversity classroom.webm (1MB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
diversity classroom.webm
1MB, 640x640px
>>
File: diversity hr.jpg (462KB, 1024x1552px) Image search: [Google]
diversity hr.jpg
462KB, 1024x1552px
>>59727958
you are talking to multiple different people
tl;dr: all evidence supports my position, virtually none supports yours

at some point you just have to stop sticking your head in the sand and start thinking about how people can address these problems instead of pretending they don't exist
>>
>>59727938
There is literally nothing wrong with being a globalist.
>>
File: diversity in the workplace.jpg (219KB, 700x701px) Image search: [Google]
diversity in the workplace.jpg
219KB, 700x701px
>>
File: can't prove it.png (40KB, 825x635px) Image search: [Google]
can't prove it.png
40KB, 825x635px
>>59727958
>>
File: diversity shitpost 2.jpg (53KB, 640x504px) Image search: [Google]
diversity shitpost 2.jpg
53KB, 640x504px
>>
File: diversity street.webm (1MB, 360x640px) Image search: [Google]
diversity street.webm
1MB, 360x640px
>>
File: cucked.jpg (13KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
cucked.jpg
13KB, 250x250px
>>59727961
>>
>>59727998
There's nothing arbitrary about it. One of the most fundamental principles of science is that statistics are nearly meaningless if you can't isolate the independent variable. Otherwise you end up with ``proof" that prayer prevents alien invasions and so on.
>>
>>
>>59727987
How would foreign countries take over an economy based entirely on consumption? They would have to provide was some worthwhile services to do so
>>
>>59728021
Isn't this a SFW board?
>>
imagine how butthurt is the drumpftard
>>
>>59727990
White imperialism is the best thing to ever happen to this shitty planet
>>
>>59728030
you can't just make a random and arbitrary claim and ask to isolate random and arbitrary data points

prove that population density affects per capita crime between races or fuck off

again,
tl;dr: all evidence supports my position, virtually none supports yours

at some point you just have to stop sticking your head in the sand and start thinking about how people can address these problems instead of pretending they don't exist
>>
>>59728043
>resorted to posting literal cuck porn
>trying to belittle others
chuckled at you IRL m8, have a nice evening
>>
>>59728063
Enjoy your ban dipshit
>>
>>
>>59728077
>racism is a bannable offense
lmao this site has gone to shit
muh safe spaces
fuck off back to r*ddit you pathetic sack of shit
>>
>>
>>
>>59728101
>none of the porn I posted is cuck porn.
thank you for finally admitting that you are an actual nigger
>>
>>59728052
Only because it was the stepping stone to globalism.

>>59728058
>you can't just make a random and arbitrary claim and ask to isolate random and arbitrary data points
>prove that population density affects per capita crime between races or fuck off
You're the one that claims that being black causes you to have a higher violent crime rate. Burden of proof is on you to isolate those two variables and show a correlation.

>start thinking about how people can address these problems instead of pretending they don't exist
I've been thinking about it since before this thread even started. But since the only proposal you people can come up with involves the abolition of human rights, it's not very likely that I'll end up going with your proposal.
>>
>>59728101
even whores don't fuck niggers
>>
>>59728123
>You're the one that claims that being black causes you to have a higher violent crime rate
...virtually every single piece of evidence that exists supports this position. You have nothing. Literally nothing. The best you've been able to do thus far is to pick an arbitrary data point without really presenting an actual argument and pretend that because it may or may not be present, somehow everything you're seeing is invalid. Keep your head in the sand, but you are not clever or objective or anything else.
>>
>>59728123
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43

read nigger
>>
>>59728123
>>59728148
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Crime_Victimization_Survey
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nvat
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
http://2kpcwh2r7phz1nq4jj237m22.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2005-Color-of-Crime-Report.pdf
https://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/
>>
>>59728123
No, because it led to free speech and the greatest country in the history of the world. Until the jews started getting all uppity
>>
>>59728148
>>59728166
He's not going to read because he's interested in maintaining his preconceived notions rather than learning the truth.
>>
>>59728182
>He's not going to read because he's interested in maintaining his preconceived notions rather than learning the truth.

This.

It takes this amount of intellectual dishonesty to be a democrat.
>>
>>59728197
Sad!
>>
wtf i hate all black people instead of judging people as individuals now
>>
>>59728148
>>59728166
>>59728167
>>59728182
>>59728197
>>59728211
You can whine and meme all you want, but until you can come up with a simple table or chart that says "here are the rates at which violent crimes are committed by blacks versus whites after adjusting for both population density and wealth level", I'm not convinced. It's not my job to do your analysis for you.
>>
>>59728269
>I'm against collectivism when it suits me
>>
>>59728272
>"here are the rates at which violent crimes are committed by blacks versus whites after adjusting for both population density and wealth level", I'm not convinced.
there's per-capita crime data posted in this thread, what more do you want?

also,
>...virtually every single piece of evidence that exists supports this position. You have nothing. Literally nothing. The best you've been able to do thus far is to pick an arbitrary data point without really presenting an actual argument and pretend that because it may or may not be present, somehow everything you're seeing is invalid. Keep your head in the sand, but you are not clever or objective or anything else.
>>
>>59728272
K so race > income
and race > population density
but somehow income+population density is going to change the result?

you are fucking stupid and looking for an excuse to ignore the data

you are unintelligent

just remember that
>>
>>59726486
The Republican party wants to remove restrictions on corporations because they are paid by those corporations to pass laws that help them. It has nothing to do with ideology; I don't think most of them are even aware of what they're doing. As long as it makes their corporate donors happy they will support it.

FWIW the Democrats do the same thing, but Republicans are worse about it and generally support more obviously anti-consumer/pro-business changes.
>>
>>59728272
>i'll just ignore every other single piece of supporting evidence itt because cumulatively it doesn't amount to a single thing
>therefore I'm not convinced

There a surprise. See >>59727998
>>
>>59728298
>>59728335
So true.
>>
>Porn sites are notorious for shitty ads and giving viruses
Haha, I swear to YHW go- I mean guy! We care about you and your privacy. Now watch some more Blackedâ„¢ videos on us!
>>
>>59728289
>there's per-capita crime data posted in this thread, what more do you want?
Did you miss the "after adjusting for..." part?

>>59728298
>you are unintelligent
Not compared to the average human. Besides, if the evidence was so strongly in your favor, then surely you could actually post some that actually stands the most basic tests of scientific credibility?
>>
>>59728675
Jesus man, have an ounce of self respect. There are dozens of credible scientific sources cited in the images posted in this thread.

But you didn't bother to even read the images, did you?

Also, see >>59728298

Then it is my turn, tell me why all nigger countries are failures.
>>
>>59728823
>tell me why all nigger countries are failures.
Largely comes down to government corruption and instability, ultimately due to forced economic transition. Europeans came in, forced them to modernize before they were ready to do it on their own, and then left without cleaning up and before they were able to properly become self-governing again.
>>
>>59728888
Since you "know" this, you must have at least as many sources debunking the studies in this thread then, right? You're arbitrarily picking "evidence" to fit your hypothesis.

Or are you going to admit they have a 15+ point lower IQ on average, but still stick with what you think?

Keep in mind, the roads they have today... were built for them by Europeans. And the dams. And the cities.

Go watch "Empire of Dust". You must be a shitskin yourself to be in this much denial.
>>
>>59728935
I didn't say I *know* this, it's just based on various theories I've heard online and in school. The resource curse is a real thing though.

>Or are you going to admit they have a 15+ point lower IQ on average, but still stick with what you think?
And you don't think being in a "developing" third-world country with extreme wealth/resource disparity will affect your IQ? Even just the lower literacy rate would be expected to cause a drop in IQ ratings - unless you're going to claim IQ tests can handle illiterate people with no distortion in scores.

>Go watch "Empire of Dust". You must be a shitskin yourself to be in this much denial.
No, I'm white. But how exactly do you explain the hypothesis that they have a biologically lower IQ? For that to make sense biologically, would basically require that their environment doesn't reward intelligence to the extent that say Europe or Asia does. Do you really think that is the case? Why? What particular about their environment meant that intelligence was not an evolutionary priority?
>>
>>59727961
>he got btfo so now hell post jew porn
Kay schlomo
>>
>>59729067
>would basically require that their environment doesn't reward intelligence to the extent that say Europe or Asia does
Maybe it does but they just started with a lower IQ.
>>
>>59724913
oh no, the government now knows I get off to pussy pump porn and asshole stretching. my life is in shambles
>>
>>59727978
No heroes wear hood-
>>
>>59729088
So you believe they evolved completely independently from Europeans and Asians? Obviously, they are a distinct genetic group, but it was my understanding that they and all the other races branched off from an original, small, homogenous human population. Do you subscribe to some other theory of human evolution?
>>
>>59729102
This, you only got something to hide if you're doing something wrong.
>>
>>59729067

So you admit you don't know, you just have a "theory". Ok then, there is a lot of evidence against you theory in this thread.

>And you don't think being in a "developing" third-world country with extreme wealth/resource disparity will affect your IQ? Even just the lower literacy rate would be expected to cause a drop in IQ ratings - unless you're going to claim IQ tests can handle illiterate people with no distortion in scores.
See the Minnesota transracial adoption study, which was posted in this thread. Blacks HERE in the US are 15 points below.

Blacks in Africa are much lower than that. American blacks have a large white admixture, you can tell by looking at Africans in Africa.

>But how exactly do you explain the hypothesis that they have a biologically lower IQ? For that to make sense biologically, would basically require that their environment doesn't reward intelligence to the extent that say Europe or Asia does. Do you really think that is the case? Why? What particular about their environment meant that intelligence was not an evolutionary priority?
You're spot on, actually. European winters were much worse in the past, and we have been outside of africa for 250k+ years.
Imagine trying to live in Sweden during the winter, with no goretex or electricity. Only those that planned ahead, and thought into the future, AND were smart/clever were allowed to reach sexual maturity. Everyone else was killed off. It is basic selective breeding.
If you have ever camped in the snow, it is hard even with current tech and food you bring with you.
>>
>>59724989
>jewish porn

what did he mean by this?
>>
>>59729067
>>59729140
Continuing before hitting page 10.

Anyway, do some serious thinking on what your ancestors had to survive through in Europe, and you will quickly see why 98%+ of the technological advancements come from whites. We had to have this mindset, otherwise we got killed off. Of course, IQ is a a bell curve, so we get Tesla and such only here and there -- but it is enough to lift us all up.

Blacks, with the peak of their bell curve set so far behind, can never achieve this.

Plus, think of this: why on earth WOULD blacks evolve the intellect we have, while living in the garden of eden, more or less, where any day of the year you can sleep naked under a tree, and food is always abundant (for their historically small populations)?

And remember, plenty of behavior is genetic. just look at dogs. A german shepherd has been separated orders of magnitude less time from a chihuahua, but look at the difference in intellect.

Selective breeding at work, just like Europe did to us.
>>
>>59729140
>You're spot on, actually. European winters were much worse in the past, and we have been outside of africa for 250k+ years.
>Imagine trying to live in Sweden during the winter, with no goretex or electricity. Only those that planned ahead, and thought into the future, AND were smart/clever were allowed to reach sexual maturity. Everyone else was killed off. It is basic selective breeding.
>If you have ever camped in the snow, it is hard even with current tech and food you bring with you.
So would you say that those conditions are harsher, not just in type but in overall magnitude, than those in Africa? Because considering the level of poverty and starvation in Africa today, compared to say Europe, it would seem that evolution "over-corrected" European intelligence, such that they're more prosperous even in their difficult environment than the Africans are in their less difficult environment.

And what about Asians? Most figures I've heard say their IQ tends to be typically slightly higher than Europeans, was their environment even harsher than Europe's?
>>
>>59729140
>>59729193
And lastly, blacks needed different breeding strategies in Africa -- see R vs K selection. Blacks spread their genes more by breeding as much as possible, rather than being required to rear and put resources into their young.

This means less smart blacks were rewarded in evolutionary history.

just google R vs K selection, and realize a black woman and child can make it on their own in Africa.

then understand why my security gaurd in Jamaica had literally 20ish kids, he didn't even know himself. A black guy named Patrick.
>>
>>59729193
>and food is always abundant (for their historically small populations)?
They don't really have abundant food compared to their current population though, what exactly happened? Did European colonization cause them to benefit from European medical technology (thus extending the lifespan), without causing the reduced birth rate due to things like post-industrialism and birth control? Or has there been in recent decades/centuries a substantial decrease in African plant/animal resources, but not in the human population?
>>
>>59729123
>So you believe they evolved completely independently from Europeans and Asians?

Dude bruh, the amount of time between the original human population and now is pretty vast. Plenty could have happened to the other groups that split off and moved that didn't to the negroid.
>>
>>59729207
We are unfortunately running out of time here, check out the R vs K though for your answer.

The point is, you can survive in Africa while NOT planning months ahead -- you can't do that in Europe, or you AND your child dies.

Just like moneys don't really plan ahead, and take things day by day, sorry, it is basically the same mindset for blacks.

One reason why the spend a shitload on their car but can't make a 200 dollar bail.
>>
>>59729224
>And lastly, blacks needed different breeding strategies in Africa -- see R vs K selection. Blacks spread their genes more by breeding as much as possible, rather than being required to rear and put resources into their young.
Were Europeans always about "quality over quantity" in breeding, even in the feudal age and earlier? I know that generally, societies move in that direction with the advent of industrialization (since one or two educated people become more productive than many unskilled workers), but how did Europe's pattern in the middle ages and earlier compare to Africa's?
>>
>>59729207
Also, most people say Asians only use their city folk for their IQ numbers, whereas other countries are more honest. I'm not sure on this one, but look around you and see hwo much was invented by them, vs by us.

Car, fridge, light, computer, transistor... it goes on endlessly.
>>
>>59729262
>Europe's pattern in the middle ages and earlier compare to Africa's?
That's not really far enough back is it?
>>
>>59729244
Even so, though, there would have to be some factor that caused the European and Asian populations to have a relative increase in "IQ" compared to the Africans.
>>
>>59729244
Just look at dogs for an easy example of how different things can quickly get with selective pressure.

Also how the fuck is this not on page 10 yet.
>>
>>59729272
No not really, but I figured anything before then wouldn't really have much solid data. Really what I'm getting at is verifying whether the R vs K selection difference between Europeans and Africa is something that only diverged with the Industrial Revolution, or if it goes back much further.
>>
>>59729273
If you really want to know, listen to this in your car:

https://archive.org/details/MyAwakeningAPathToRacialUnderstanding

Skip ch 1-3 if you don't care about his life, he explains it all in a very straightforward, evidence based way. It is incredible.

Also he is a disappointingly nice kind guy, which you wouldn't expect.

Listen tot his shit and he answers all your questions you've been asking.
>>
>>59729275
Dogs tend to live much shorter lives and produce more offspring though.

>>59729273
Neanderthals maybe?
>>
>>59729289
It goes back much much further, since you need K in Europe, or who feeds your mate and child during the winter, which could last for who knows how long? They would die.
>>
>>59729306
True, but there are far more generations between us and blacks even with that taken into account. Think about the timescales involved on each side.
>>
>>59729306
Speaking of, we have about 3.5% Neanderthal DNA, whereas blacks have zero, asians about 1.5% or 2%.

Listening to this would literally explain everything in a couple hours, it addresses all your questions basically exactly >>59729295
>>
>>59729343
I wonder what the first half neanderthal half homo-sapien looked and acted like.
>>
>>59728044
When liberals don't get their way, they result to breaking the rules

They are literally criminals
>>
>>59729722
What makes you think it was a liberal that posted that? It's usually insecure conservatives that fall for the BBC forced meme.
>>
>>59729772
Because the only people who exist on this board are liberals and liberals in disguise.

The fact that you took the bait that quick shows as such.
>>
>>59729803
So are you a liberal or just stupid?
Thread posts: 392
Thread images: 136


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.