no wonder people want storage to be as fast as ram this is insane

you have to be 18 to post here

>>59719580
im 30 and setting up the ram disk for gamecube emulation and thought i would compare the two

File: 960 EVO.png (36KB, 409x373px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 409x373px

Why not compare it to a NVMe drive?
SATA based SSD already hit the wall, it's kinda pointless to throw it up there for comparison.

>>59719629
because i do not have an NVMe drive yet

>>59719597
30 years old and don't have a job so your just pirating games. Not surprising that your workflow doesn't already require a large ramdisk

>>59719662
200MHz makes that much of a difference?

>>59719673
i have a job this is my day off though

>>59719557
Once SSD's become faster than RAM, will RAM die? Will we read directly from the storage?

>>59719676

It's not just about the frequency or latency, there's a ton of things at play there.
For example if you have Micron or Hynix memory, it pales in comparison to Samsung, which is what the 3200/3600mhz g.skill RAM uses.
Here's some benchmarks
http://www.memorybenchmark.net/read_uncached_ddr4_intel.html

why arent computers half big ass cpu and half shitton of memory?

>>59719676
it's quad channel memory

>>59719787
> implying it isn't already

>>59719787
because the memory could not store anything over a powerloss

File: 4b6bca5c00d321022b2717eeef49bd8460f0c616fcd5f92ae736f1bbaaadd253.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

>>59719830
and just like that i got btfo

>>59719629
Is that at x4 anon?
I have a 960 evo and the bios resolutely refuses to boot when set to x4 and reverts to x2, I have very similar performance stats though.
Maybe it doesn't matter.