>140W housefire vs cool and nice 95W >10C/20T barely beating

File: us irael relationship.jpg (1015KB, 1350x3570px) Image search: [Google]

1015KB, 1350x3570px

i dont know anon

File: amd-is-so-fucking-shit.png (169KB, 1096x495px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1096x495px

>>59717724
Uh oh don't compare it to the cheaper and faster Intel processor

>>59717758
>6950x vs 7700K
>3% difference
>for a fucking 1200 bucks more.

fuck you intel.

>>59717758
Apples and oranges, retarded shiteating shill.

File: 1488396296607.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59717781
Oh no please don't compare it to the better Intel processor!

>>59717758
Here comes the king of corelets. You do know top of the line Ryzen was made to compete with top of the line Intel, right?

>>59717789
You're admitting anything Intel sells over $300 is overpriced dogshit, right?

>>59717797
Ryzen was supposed to compete in the mainstream and it gets completely BTFO by Intel's offerings.

File: 1487284046126.jpg (45KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1500x1500px

>>59717758
>7700K
>faster in anything but muh outdated gaeyms

File: Untitled-1.png (94KB, 1520x611px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1520x611px

>>59717758
If you would trade 32.5% single core for 60% multicore performance, you're a fucking retard.

That's not counting the extra price you pay for an OC-capable motherboard and cooler, so really, it should still be compared to the more expensive Ryzen CPU anyway, but let's just play along for now, shilly shill shillington.

File: ryzen-photoshop.jpg (79KB, 701x479px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 701x479px

>>59717824
>he thinks it's only games

Oh boy

>>59717848
You should really be banned for spamming this fucking shit benchmark over and over. Single core, percentages, not really a big difference, beats the $1000 Intel CPU. It's like shitty benchmark bingo. Just fucking kill yourself already.

File: 1488400157075.jpg (114KB, 960x874px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 960x874px

>>59717838
Did you seriously just photoshop in different prices?

Jesus AMD shills are truly unhinged.

>>59717758
faster?
Are you 13?

File: excel.png (27KB, 500x450px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x450px

>>59717865
It's a pretty big fucking deal when a $350 Intel processor is 20% faster than a $500 Ryzen processor

And it's not just one benchmark

>>59717848

Lol let that benchmark go man. It's been proven to be false several times now.

File: photoshop.png (28KB, 500x450px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x450px

>>59717888
Retard that is straight from Puget Systems, it's 100% true.

Not only that but the results have been duplicated on tons of other sites, pic related.

>>59717821
>Ryzen was supposed to compete in the mainstream
>compete
>implying it doesn't

But it actually does anon. Besides it's already being a revolution in the sector, bringing more, actually good, affordable cores to the mainstream sector. Something Intel would have never done without raping your ass.

You can enjoy your King of Corelets™ 7700K on your game, that's your right as a consumer. I know you'll thank AMD later when you finally upgrade from that.

File: Holy+i+didn+t+have+that+one+_27f4ea5616d2dbe9b98e1e04f0cfb675.png (26KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 200x200px

>>59717789
>4 cores
oy vey why do you need 2, 1 should be enough

File: eea0abaf0a1d80c7752a0e2431730434.gif (498KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 400x400px

>>59717887
>$350 Intel CPU faster than $1000 Intel CPU

File: ryzen-cpu-value.png (26KB, 773x371px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 773x371px

>>59717911
>It's already being a revolution in the sector, bringing more, actually good, affordable cores to the mainstream sector

You truly are an AMD shill with that kind of bullshit.

Revolution? What a revolution in overpriced underperforming CPUs?

File: 1491162177110.png (55KB, 764x954px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 764x954px

>>59717848
>muh photoshop

File: cores.jpg (97KB, 558x695px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 558x695px

>>59717916

File: 1490730560540.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>59717925
(you)

>>59717925
>Cost per FPS
Jesus Christ, that's almost as retarded as /o/'s HP/Liter.
Are you actually implying I should buy a dual core CPU in 2017?

>>59717925
>everyone, buy i3's!

File: 1471434944301.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>59717930
good goyim

>>59717925
Everyone run out and buy an i3-7350K

File: Untitled-1.jpg (303KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1920x1080px

>>59717939
>>59717946
yes goyim

File: photoshit.jpg (103KB, 630x767px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 630x767px

>>59717848
hhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmm

>>59717925
Welp, you just went on full damage control. Sad, I was having a real nice talk with you.

Like I said, King of Corelets™ 7700K it's nice for your games and you can enjoy your extra 180 vs 160 fps it gives over Ryzen. We still have a long way to go to multithreaded gaming. Not surprising with Intel having a monopoly on the market for so long and withelding more than 4 cores offering to more expensive markets.

It's changing though :)

>>59717970
t. AMD shill

>>59718012
t. Ad hominem Jew

>>59718012
t. good goyim

>>59718028
>>59718037
+20 points have been added to your AMD Red Team accounts.

>>59718055
>AMD Red Team
is this the big bad boogeymen or something

Do these overpriced pieces of shit actually sell for $1600? Good God...

File: 2017-02-27_02h38_36.png (872KB, 1916x485px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 1916x485px

>>59718077
yes, thanks to the JIDF intel can sell truckloads of them

>>59717724
>intel
oy vey

>>59717821
ryzen 5 and 3 are, ryzen 7 was for compeating with shilltels HEDT (aka x99) CPUs

>>59719126
But that goes against the narrative goyim