Firefox or Chrome?

Iridium

Chrome because it's a lot snappier and doesn't have regular visual lag, thus making it more aesthetic.

>>59697249
Nope. Iridium can't run rabb.it

The answer is ungoogled-chromium

>>59697229
>>>/v/

If you use either one of those normie magnets, you don't belong here.

>>59697229
Qupzilla

>>59697265
no lag in firefox, extra work to make it work good though. Chrome adds extra botnet network lag, realistically.

>>59697271
As a /g/ent there's meme forks you can play with or just fix firefox.

Qutebrowser coming up too.

File: photo_2017-04-01_22-26-56.jpg (29KB, 670x283px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 670x283px

>>59697229

>>59697229
Chrome provides a better user experience. Firefox isn't a botnet.

I use chrome

I like Vivaldi and Brave. Brave has no dark theme though, not gonna switch to it yet.

>>59697326
What does the e= signify?

>>59697377
e=mc^2

>>59697266
What do you do on rabb.it? Just checked it out, seems like a generic shithole to memestream anime.

>>59697386
A religion concerning matter-energy conversion? Interesting.

File: thepain.png (29KB, 414x470px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 414x470px

>>59697326
>tfw both firefox and chrome are sjw

>>59697229
B R A V E

R

A

V

E

>>59697401
That image is explicitly just after peace though. What's wrong with that?

>>59697377
Probably some equality bollocks.

>>59697398
basically science niggas

>>59697401
firefox is clearly the lesser of two evils since while both are sjw, firefox is less of a botnet

File: 1481841973821.jpg (71KB, 495x450px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 495x450px

>>59697410
I'll use images however I see fit

>>59697415
True, but Firefox is so bloated that it's hardly usable for me. Forks of old (see "functional") versions of Firefox are really the only option.
>but muh seamonkey and vivaldi
I like it when websites actually display properly, thank you very much.

>>59697461
the other option is reconfiguring firefox and setting up the appropriate addons. maybe getting something to ramdisk your profile at the most extreme. the entire firefox performance problem is shitty default options.

Also people on windows sometimes have awful video drivers which breaks hardware acceleration? I haven't seen this on linux, so I assume your OS is bad and gay.

SeaMonkey

>>59697461
Try enabling e10s on Firefox. It was slow as shit for me before doing that fix.

File: MS Paint Elephant just huffed spraypaint.png (19KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 650x650px

>>59697229
Firefox on my Debian desktop because it has the best extensions and system resources are a non-issue. Safari on my laptops because it has good enough extensions and gives my nearly two extra hours of battery life over Firefox.

>>59697461
Plus Vivaldi is just a Russian botnet anyway.

>>59697388
You've never used it? It's pretty popular among 4chan autists

>>59697569
Nope. Legitimately curious.

File: man-of-steel.jpg (35KB, 475x307px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 475x307px

>>59697377
It stands for hope

>>59697326
What about a regular bloke. A blue collar every day man just working hard to keep the lights on for his family? Where is he?

>>59697326
>not embracing multiculturalism

firefox is a laggy shitty browser

>>59698041
so fix it and then continue using it. it's not hard, even >>>/v/ toddlers can handle it.

>>59698010
He is dead at fifty something years of age. Although he deserved it because an ancestor of his called a black person a coon 150 years ago.

>>59698010
That's the problem with minority identity politics. These people only care about themselves and their own constituents. I can't trust these scum to govern equally when everything they do is to exclude other groups in favor of their groups.

>>59697326
>no white male

>>59697265
Chrome completely rapes your RAM, though.

>>59697426

Holy shit, I havent seen that in years

>>59697326
You know what's baffling about their doodles? You never actually see them in Chrome unless you deliberately bookmark Google.com and who does that when their new tab is the same exact thing.

>>59700695
Most people have already moved past 1GB of ram in their computers.

I'm going to be the only truthful person ITT.

Firefox is better because I use it way more than chrome.
>i could make a list of why but it's unneeded
>firefox is better because I use it

>>59697229
Opera.
(Just kidding.)

Firefox rapes your RAM less, has less botnet and who gives a shit about the homepage, anyway?

>>59697266
I do not trust anything that was once googled, Appled, or Microsafted.

Anything touched by a megacorporation or government could have had something placed deep, deep within it that could be lied about or distracted from by removing a red-herring or irrelevant feature in the opensource version.

>>59701435
When will the ram meme end, the reason Chrome blows firefox out of the water when it comes to speed is because it uses ram for something good.

your ram is being put to use, why is this bad? Just don't have 400 tabs open when you play games

>>59701538
It's not a meme, not all of us run megacomputers with 16 gigs. Sometimes, smallness is something to appreciate.

File: stallman_slap.jpg (202KB, 460x450px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 460x450px

>>59697229
Firefox

>>59701560
I have 8gbs of ram and a budget amd cpu. Chrome runs 100% smother than Firefox.

>>59697288
>Qutebrowser
>fork
nani?

>>59701568

Ask if he has any good porn

>>59701582
So fix firefox.

>>59701603
Qutebrowser is a python browser moving from the antique QtWebKit into QtWebEngine(blink), hardware accelerated PyQt5. Very fast and light but pretty buggy and not featureful.

File: windowNew.png (46KB, 1400x1028px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1400x1028px

>>59697229
Metanoia master race, reporting in.
>sensible defaults
>not ugly as fuck
>100% free software (MIT)

>>59701667
>High learning curve
No thanks

Firefox ==> privacy
Chrome ==> Speed/Performance

>>59703516
Firefox can be both with proper configs.

palemoon

All of you cucks:
Chrome/Chromium uses SANDBOX, therefore it's the only choice. Chrome never had a bug of remote code execution and will never have. Everything is more secure, also if you wish to have Flash on Linux there is no other way as it's no longer supported natively.
Firefox and others have no sandbox and their bugs can really harm you.

>>59704334
I'll happily take a less secure browser over a less capable one.

>>59701667
>duckduckgo
nice bait

>>59697229
ungoogled chromiun
50% less rape

>>59704334
>you should use chrome if you want security
>you should use chrome if you want flash
wat

Plus, not all of us frequent Brazilian zoophilia sites. The Google botnet is more widespread and more important to avoid.

>>59697271
Kys

chrome syncs with custom DPI settings on xubuntu, so i finally switched from firefox