/g/ alternative of this? >inb4 transmission

>>59689662
deluge baka

qbittorrent

>>59689662

Explain why I shouldn't use this.

>>59689669
this

>>59689678
became shit, lagging.

>>59689678

this

>>59689678
>Explain why I shouldn't use this.
https://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-quietly-installs-riskware-bitcoin-miner-users-report-150306/

>>59689678
well, you're either using an ad-filled bloated client or an extremely outdated client

>>59689693

2.2.1 baka

uTorrent 2.2.1

I tried to use Transmission but I kept getting "torrent stalled" messages. I asked for help but everybody was like HA HA MEMES LOL so I tried Deluge and everything works fine.

qbit

>>59689662
the one with the pony

>>59689698

Don't think it did it to me. If it did that's an issue though.

>>59689701

Don't really give a fuck about small ads in the corner when piratebay is already riddled with popup traffic diverted trash.

>>59689678
>Botnet
>Adware
>Security issues
>Bloated
>Laggy

Babbys first torrent client

I like Deluge, reminds me of the earlier days with uTorrent

File: Untitled.png (7KB, 1091x343px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1091x343px

>>59689662
why?

>>59689833
>having a bitcoin miner installer
>32-bit
>not using qbittorrent
ISHYGDDT

>>59689678
lag+adware+botnet

Not even trying to contribute to some faggot circlejerk but can someone explain why utorrent 2.2.1 works better than the latest version of qbittorrent for me? Even if you select certain files to not download in qbittorrent it downloads them anyway. It's done this over the past few versions for me. Torrents also download faster through utorrent for me. Even though from what I can tell they have the same configurations. I'm legit curious as to what the reasons are.

File: IMG_20161002_190712.jpg (172KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 528x960px

5thing Deluge. Great simple software, no frills no extras it just works.

>>59689903
BECAUSE WITH THE NEW VERSION, UTORRENT LAG I DUNNO WHY.

>>59689903
excluding files works fine for me. if there's a difference in dl speed there's something wrong with your router or firewall. make sure it uses the same port

File: 2017-04-01 12-59-46.webm (3MB, 1920x1014px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1014px

>>59689767
>piratebay is already riddled with popup traffic diverted trash.
Are you new to adblockers?

>>59689833
The retard strikes again.

>>59689932

>excluding files works fine for me

Well it doesn't for me.

>there's something wrong with your router or firewall. make sure it uses the same port

I've already checked everything.

That's why I'm asking on here. I'm completely out of ideas.

So how safe is it to just blindly torrent animu off Pirate Bay with uTorrent2.2.1 and no VPN or anything.

Not movies/music, animu

>>59690561
Unless you live in USA, UK, Germany or some other country that hates Internet privacy: literally zero risk

Blockbusters too

>>59689903
Because qBittorrent is shit. qBittorrent's development in 2017 is pretty much where uTorrent was around version 1.4. They have a long way to go.
Just keep using uTorrent 2.2.1. uTorrent got the basics down pat in 1.6.1, then after fixing the regressions they reintroduced in 1.7, they buttoned it down.

>>59689678
keep using the good version

>>59690561
>pirate bay

use nyaa

>>59690561
Torrenting is peer to peer. If there's someone on the torrent writing down IPs they can see the one you're using. The client hands it out because the other client needs to know where to send the pieces. So uTorrent 2.2.1 is no safer in that regard. If the torrent is an RIAA honeypot, it's a honeypot, and they'll gather up everybody.
We use uTorrent 2.2.1 because it just works better at torrenting, not because it has some mystical ability to hide your IP.

File: 1485561490063.png (430KB, 800x705px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 800x705px

>>59691223
>>59691367
>using very outdated software that lets random people connect to your computer

>>59691424
>using software developed by unpaid neckbeards who can't even get it working right.
uTorrent connects do other peers. That's its job. qBittorrent doesn't, So who is it trying to connect to, then.

>>59689662
Transmission

>>59689669
Same here. Deluge just werks.

>>59691487
PEBCAK
qB works fine for me on public and private trackers.

>>59691534
Post stats.

>>59689662
I prefer rTorrent + ruTorrent for server/seedbox and Deluge as desktop client

>>59691318
How do I nyaa

>>59691698
>how do I use a search engine
wew lad

for me it's utorrent pro or nothing

>>59689662
you can't inb4 yourself.

Anyway, what's wrong with just btdownloadcurses/btdownloadheadless + tmux?

Always been using transmission-ci
Whats bad about transmission? It gets the job done.

>>59689662
qBittorrent

>>59691510
Hope you dont use a Mac

https://blog.malwarebytes.com/threat-analysis/2016/09/transmission-hijacked-again-to-spread-malware/

This has happened TWICE

File: tixati.png (88KB, 878x645px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 878x645px

Tixati

>>59689953
Yeah, I have this same issue. Also I wish that I could find an option to open the folder of whatever just finished downloading when I click on the balloon notification like I can in uTorrent.

it's cute how qbittorrent tries to hide its slow transfer speed by using mebibits instead of megabytes.

What torrent client is:

1) decent lookng
2) doesn't download parts of unchecked files (or at least hides them so the user can't see them).
3) doesn't rescan download status every time you start a client, e.g. if downloaded torrent was deleted from the HDD and torrent status still stays at "100% completed/downloaded).

What's with this uTorrent 2.2.1 meme? Why won't it die?

File: Halite-Portable_1.png (102KB, 642x452px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 642x452px

Halite.

>minimal as fuck
>light on system resources
>FOSS
>portable

What's not to like?

>>59691868
I dunno but it's stupid because they have added many features since then.

I mean I use Halite, it seems to well.... werk

>>59691884
So the new meme is the latest uTorrent?

Why are people this stupid?

File: 4L_CLGbWCCy.jpg (21KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 200x200px

>>59691743

>>59691869
>>59691887
hmmm...

Samefag.

>>59691900
whatever latest utorrent version that is whitelisted on all the trackers is what I use.

>>59691911
>samefag
>less than 60 seconds between posts
Hmm...

>>59691951
So you used your phone and desktop, who cares? Still samefag.

File: master race torrenting.png (63KB, 1914x622px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1914x622px

Master race reporting in!

utorrent was never good and you're an idiot if you ever used it

>>59692040
what did you use when torrenting was introduced? bittorrent?

>>59692210
>what did you use when torrenting was introduced? >bittorrent?

Guilty.

>>59692210
limewire way back in the day and then rtorrent /transmission
they're all like 15 years old

Deluge with vpn to avoid copyright fucks.

Vpn is just like 30$ for a whole year anyways, and should be mandatory these days when viewing porn and shit with isp wanting to harvest your data

>>59692397
So you'll let the VPNs harvest your data.

Face it, the answer is i2p. The future is i2p. Clearnet is dead.

>>59689662

qbittorrent

No.
Stuck with 2.0.4 for life.

>>59692431
The proper answer is to move to a 3rd world country with 100mbit/s internet for ~7$/month and no copyright bullshit to deal with ^____^

>>59689662
Tixati

qbittorrent

Isn't Deluge technically best for being modular?

why would anyone use this over qbittorrent other than for the possibility they don't know qbittorrent exists?

i can not think of a SINGLE reason. the clients are basically completely identical UI-wise so it isn't like that's a hurdle

>>59691940
why wouldnt you use qB?

Tixati. I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned more often.

>>59692894
>>59692928
If you love stalled downloads and lost data...

>>59693294
That's just another meme, anon. Since when did we take memes seriously?

>>59689662

I just use the KTorrent that came with my Mint KDE. Works fine.

>>59693331
to be fair ive noticed some stalled downloads actually....ive had qB for a couple years or more. i thought it was just because there were no seeders left.

lost data i haven't noticed as much. maybe one single time, or two, out of hundreds of downloads

I've used Transmission on Linux since the beginning and qBittorrent on Windows. The only feature I miss is being able to manually add a peer.

Can you do search the same amazing way with torrent clients other than qBittorrent?

If not, they're trash.

>>59689670
muh melanin enriched gentleman friend.

>>59691868
It works, and nothing has been added to the torrent protocol since to make it obsolete. Freetard clients need new releases because they still haven't gotten the basics down. uTorrent got it down with 1.8.5, with 2.0.4 and 2.2.1 just being minor tweaks.
Why would you want to go through the hassle of waiting for your private trackers to whitelist some new bug-ridden client when 2.2.1 has been working perfectly for millions since 2011?

>>59694126
See >>59693919

>>59694395
>literal botnet

>>59694521
Yes, indeed uTorrent is.

>>59689662

Tixati is numba one.

>>59689934
They don't affect it

>>59689678
utorrent 2.2.1 is fine.

>>59691790
Transmission's best on OS X

Anything else is fine. For my use every client seems exactly the same in terms of functionality, so I'll obviously just use the ones that are GPL/free software.

>>59694609
Are you new to adblockers?

>>59694126
What does 2.2.1 have that qBittorrent doesn't?

>>59694974
The ability to connect.

It also doesn't delete all your torrents on an ungraceful shutdown or start redownloading files after you delete them. "Not doing anything retarded" is a pretty good design feature.

>>59691811
fucking kill yourself right now cunt

>>59694974
Security holes?

/g/, why are these people lying?
>>59695189
>>59695228

File: download.png (131KB, 730x495px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 730x495px

>>59689662
Deluge here. work great.

qStalledtorrent master race

File: Capture.png (76KB, 1215x527px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1215x527px

>>59695253
It also uses more CPU doing nothing than uTorrent does seeding.

>>59695338
python sucks

>>59695338
>Win 10
>32-bit
ew

>>59695383
Your torrent client use more than 2GB RAM?

>>59695383
Why'd you need 64 bit for a torrent client? Legit interested.

>>59695402
How is that relevant?

>>59695417
Why do you need deprecated 32 bit for anything?

Legit interested.

>>59689670
i use this too. i love the search engine that comes with it.

>>59695383
>>59695418
(32 bit) means that the application is 32-bit, not the OS, retardo.

>>59695449
I never claimed otherwise, faggotron.

>>59689662
What's wrong with Transmission? I click on magnet links and torrents download. Why would you need more than that?

That being said, you are probably looking for Deluge or qBittorrent.

/g/ is more retaded than normal today

>>59695417
>>59695402
if you have a choice between 32 and 64 bit, you should always choose 64 bit. its not just about how much ram it uses, its also about performance.

>>59695449
no shit retard

>>59695470

Using w10 is the bigger transgression though.

https://wiki.installgentoo.com/index.php/List_of_recommended_GNU/Linux_software#BitTorrent_clients

>>59689662
/g/ doesn't use torrents
They know FTP is the superior protocol and that piracy is morally unjustifiable, only being practiced by objectively inferior individuals.

>>59695353
Yeah, just now upgraded to 1.3.14 from 1.3.12 and saw it hit 7.2% before settling down to 2-3.5% idle.
uTorrent is now 0.6% running at 12Mbit. (which is actually faster than speedtest shows my connection is)

File: cvetorrent.png (75KB, 1137x319px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1137x319px

>>59689678

>>59695547
Holy shit rekt

How will 2.2.1fags ever recover?

Is peerblock a meme?

>>59695547
>using uTorrent 3.x
That's a huuuge 2MB client with a media player, virus checker, and browser for serving ads. Of course it's full of holes. (Just think what the 16MB qBittorrent is like!)
uTorrent 2.2.1 is 391k.

>>59695635
Are you saying 2.2.1 doesn't employ the bittorrent or magnet protocol?

>>59689669
This

>>59695736
What client doesn't?

>>59695826
So remote attackers can inject command line parameters and execute arbitrary commands on 2.2.1 then. Glad we cleared that up.

>>59695537

Fuck off, moralfag. We use torrents plenty.

>>59695904
>poorfags

>>59695903
So remote attackers can inject command line parameters and execute arbitrary commands on qBittorrent then. Glad we cleared that up.

qbittorrent

>>59695950
>16MB of botnet

>>59689833
Yulia please uninstall that

>>59695962
>qbittorrent
>botnet
????

>>59695987
When was the last time you performed a security audit on it, verifying that every binary was clean?

File: fecal.png (16KB, 120x120px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 120x120px

>>59696008
well, never

>>59695927
Huh? I thought qBittorrent was updated, unlike 2.2.1.

Is there some secret I'm not privy to?

>>59695962
>>59696008
Not him, but I monitor my network and look at the logs. you are full of shit.

>>59696029
>>59696030

>>59696038
Updated to what? They still don't even have a fully working client.

qbittorrent a best
only problem I've had was in the past that some version didn't rename completed files but they fixed it

>>59696061
then why does it work for me and many others?

>>59696040
So you're saying you detect no IPs connecting to qBittorrent? Rather explains its difficulties torrenting.

File: baitkai.jpg (77KB, 1080x1110px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1080x1110px

>>59696061
Huh?

>>59696072
this

>>59696078
>being this retarded

>>59696074
It doesn't. You just have no idea what a working torrent client looks like.

>>59696122
amazing, should I delete my 15TB movie library and start over?

>>59696152
Post stats.

I use OneSwarm.

>>59689662
>transmission-cli

>>59692006
Enjoy all your torrents *snicker*

I use uTorrent and it works perfectly like always.

I don't see any problem with it.

And those who always are worried about spying or ads. Welcome to The Internet, today all webs or programs colect your data to do shit. Personally I don't care anymore about that. I used to be extremely paranoid about cookies, what data the programs recolect, etc. Now I don't give a shit anymore. It's impossible to be in the internet and don't be giving some of your data to programs or webs. They can recolect all they want, I don't give a shit if they see my porn or what I post here.

Come get me bitch.

>>59696361
>Personally I don't care anymore
https://youtu.be/lj3iNxZ8Dww

File: picotorrent1.png (36KB, 1578x409px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1578x409px

>>59689662
PicoTorrent

http://www.picotorrent.org/

>using anything other than libtorrent

>>59695215
Why? What's wrong with Tixati?

>>59691698
It's easier than tpb. Go to the site, look up what anime you want and get one.

>>59695968
No :( I don't want to

Tixati works best for me.

I've been a deluge user for a long time, but recently I've been having problems with it on windows where the longer I leave the torrent client running, the more ram and CPU usage it eats up, until its just ridiculous.

People on the deluge forums have said it's a problem with using the deluge gtk interface on windows since windows doesn't like gtk or something.

It's only a problem ive noticed since I moved to windows 10 from 7. Deluge works fine on an linux installation ive tried.

Anyone else have this problem or find a way to fix it?

>>59691811
this
>>59695215
idiot
>>59697453
Nothing, he's a moron

>>59689662
utorrent 221

>>59689857
does it still have it?

>>59689662
Deluge every day

>>59696558
picotorrent is for cucks
banned on muh private sites

>>59689669
I second to this but >>59689670 is also a valid answer

Also OP, this is for you
http://alternativeto.net/

>>59699289
Easy answer: Stop using windows 10.

>>59689669
Fuck yes. Tixati is also breddy gud too.

File: 1369978513033.png (32KB, 500x597px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x597px

>400 torrents
>actively seeding 30-40 at a time, rest queued
>seed when ratio under 130% and seeds less than 3

name a better client for my use case than uTorrent 3.2

>>59700354
literally anything

neck yourself

>>59689670
>uninstall utorrent
>install qbit
>cpu load 100%
>uninstall qbit
>install deluge

>>59689662
cracked jew torrent
>acceptavle unironically

qbit torrent
>acceptable client with search engine

deluge
>shit

transmission
>idk

rtorrent
>lincuck meme

>>59695547
How many command can the attacker execute through utorrent?

>>59698788
Why do you like getting anally penetrated by the botnet?

>>59689662
qbittorrent installed by defualt

>>59689662
I use 2.2.1 version, its a best

>>59700519

They only need to execute one, which is to install a rootkit. Then you need to nuke the whole thing to be sure.

File: shit b8.jpg (27KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 625x626px

>assuming everyone here uses windows
Disgusting
rtorrent
/thread

>>59689662
Just use 2.2.1 and stop being a faggot.

>>59689670
this

Or search for hacked mod of vuze. It's bretty gud
>sb-innovation.de

aria2

>>59689662
Tribler

>>59689662
Tixati. It's fast and doesn't have ads in it. And it's written in c++ not buggy python.

>>59700354
Literally any other torrent client. Are you mentally damaged?

File: 1488473402943.jpg (24KB, 400x250px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x250px

>>59700375
>>59703637
>name one
>doesn't name any
Are you mentally damaged?

>>59689922
>just works
Stops working once you have more than 1k torrents

>>59703980

>1k torrents

That's way too many for one connection.

>>59704394
It's not like they'd all ever be seeding at once.

>>59704407

Still, if you have that many you might want to look into seedboxes instead.

>>59704430
Why? I just need to seed the torrents, I don't care if all of them can't be active simultaneously.

Why haven't everyone switched over to i2p snark already?

Surface web is compromised, abandon it!

>>59704453

Tell me more.

>>59701035
Most threads are going to be aimed at the general use case. If you installed MS-DOS on your smartwatch and are looking for a torrent client for that, you're going to have to do the research on your own. Feel free to make a thread about it, though.

What happend to Vuze?

>>59704453
>>59704496
USE FREENET INSTEAD BAKA

test

>>59689670
/thread

>>59689670
I have been using this for 3 years, it's only improving.

>>59689670
Nothing else needed to be said.

usenet

>>59689662
>there are people on this board talking about torrenting while unironically using GUI based bloatware
rtorrent is the only viable answer, saged

>>59689670
This and only this

>>59705752
>not at least using qbittorrent-nox if you don't want GUI