Firefox 57 "Photon"

File: Screenshot_20170401_004953.png (185KB, 722x504px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 722x504px

will be a good firefox to uninstall

It's like a shittier version of what I've been doing for four years with classic theme restorer

>>59678866
>metro
When will this cancer end?

>>59678866
nice safe space faggotry
needs more play doh

>>59678866
Jesus fuck that's hideous

>>59678866

Looks like what Developer Edition has had by default for a while now. I like that there are no more rounded tabs, but not sure I see the benefit in making the address bar have a fixed width.

>>59678866
stop using firefox

How much longer till Firefox is literally who tier?

>>59679033

Once Microsoft Edge has more users than them. They might as well end it after then.

>>59679033
What is an open source alternative that isn't botnet-integrated?

>>59678866
literally opera

still better than current default

>>59679067
surf? any random webkit browser? still using firefox here, but i might use surf when firefox really hits the shit

>>59678866
What's up with all these wasted space?

>>59678866
now let us move the tabs to the side in a tree style tabs way and were good.

>>59679098

Right?! It was bad enough when they removed the small icons option (forcing the address bar to be bigger), but why do the tabs have to be so big? Also, making the address bar a fixed width is so pointless.

>>59679114
I simply can't understand why this isn't an option in all browsers by default.

Widescreen monitors have been the norm now for a while and not only are tabs on the side a much better use of space (as most websites do not fully utilise a widescreen) it allows for great implementations like tree style tabs which cannot be done with the tabs on top.

>>59679230
Pretty much this yeah
specially all the rage for ULTRACHINGCHONG vision wide screens

Makes no fucking sense.

>>59678866
Is the developer theme safe?

>>59679274
why not use the compact theme?, its bretty gud

>>59679274
They're actually moving both color schemes down to the stable branches because people like them. I think they're being merged in to stable in FF53

>>59678866
How did we go from 3.6 to this?

>>59679296
its better than australis though.

>>59678866
looks like absolute trash. brave browser is better.

>>59678866
too much blank or unnecessary vertical space
shit back button
still has that obnoxious light edge
url bar should take up the whole top section

>>59678866
AH MY EYES
time to use palemoon

>>59678866
looks like trash
what's with that tiny ass url bar?

looks okay but the wasted space needs to be fixed

>>59678866
Firefox dev edition will still be compact

>>59678962
Do normalfags actually like this shit or is it still just nuMicrosoft forcing it?

>>59679454
Yes

this is what happens when you hire sjw filth

>>59679471
nah
australis is what happens when you hire sjw filth
this is more of a we hired toddlers to do the new UI

>>59678948

This

>>59678866
Are they chrome yet?

>>59678866
This will look great with my KDE desktop! Thanks Mozira!

>last thread
>/g/ praised the redesign and claimed that mozilla won
>this thread
>everyone says the new look is literal shit
What the fuck /g/ seriously

>>59679511
Which is still an upgrade from SJWs.

>>59678866
>tabs on top
trash
garbage
mozilla literally is unable to stop wasting money

>>59679599
rectangular tabs will always be superior to round tabs

File: screenshot.18.png (260KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1920x1080px

looks like a more shit version of what I have Firefox configured as

>>59679649
>only room for 6 tabs

Jesus fuck, anon.

Howd you manage to make it WORSE?

File: screenshot.20.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>59679679
The search bar decreases in size the more tabs I have open.

>>59679649
I like it

>>59678866
Looks like I will switch to Seamonkey.

>address bad is smaller than is could be
And I thought they couldn't do anything more retarded than rounded tabs.

>>59679701
>leddit
>arch
>tumblr
>ponyshit

ayyyyy

>>59678866
I literally can't find a single good thing to say about it. It's that bad.

>>59678866
Weird amalgamation of Opera and Firefox

>>59678866
Panorama?

Looks like hot fucking garbage. So glad I ditched this trainwreck years ago.

>>59679003
stop burning churches

>>59679701
So much cancer on that screenshot that I think I have it now too.

>>59679067
Palemoon. Used to be a firefox fork but branched off completely into its own browser.

>>59679067
If you like old school seamonkey

>>59679701
I threw up in my mouth a little

>>59678866
I already pinned the previous ESR so Firefox will never be upgraded again.

Fuck their bullshit. This is what they do now, design skins.

>>59678866
sudo apt-get remove firefox-esr; sudo apt-get install brave

>>59678934
And install what?

>>59678866
Shit looks exactly the same. I'm not going to look at these tutorials ever so that's not relevant to me.

>>59681789
Get raped and kill yourself, you retarded kike loving fucking faggot sack of ugly nigger shit with down syndrome.

>>59679348
I liked Brave, but no grease monkey and thus no 4chanx killed it for me.

>>59678866
They are trying to kill themselves so hard

>>59678866
looks good

I really don't care what the Mozilla lads do. As long as Firefox remains the most customizable browser, I can always undo whatever ugliness Mozilla comes up with.

I just love what they've done with the new Firefox, for the past month it's been freezing frequently, which it never did before, while telling me "one of your pages may be slowing it down, wait/ignore?" and it's usually a resource hungry page like cuckbook/news sites with flash everywhere/or an 8ch thread with 600 replies!

>>59682393
G E N T O O
E
N
T
O
O

>>59679701
>The search bar decreases in size the more tabs I have open.
That wasted space above, they better fix the UI again.

>>59682534
https://github.com/ccd0/4chan-x-proxy
bam, 4chan x anywhere

File: 1413151586297-4.jpg (10KB, 255x245px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 255x245px

>>59678866
OP pic related is part of the reason nobody uses firefox anymore.

They just keep pandering to babbys first computer user. What they don't realise is that user will just use what comes with the OS, and they keep pissing off the techies, the ones who will be exposed to the browser and recommend it to the illiterates.

The techies tell them they're doing a shit job for shit users, and they respond with pandering *even harder*. (Break all the plugins! Chromeify the UI twice! Remove features! Extension nannying!)

Mozilla is what happens when you let retard SJWs run a company into the ground.

Well it's a step up from Australis

>>59678866
more bloat for kindergarten kids

File: 1491005634784.png (21KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 900x900px

>>59678866
time to die

>>59683683
Nah, breaking all the plugins and extensions is a good plan. They need to purge the bullshit they used to have to implement new core tech and multiprocess security. It'll probly get shat up before they ever realize that goal though.

As for UIs, who even looks at the UI? Move it the fuck out of the way so I can get to my content.

>>59679003
stop using chrome

>>59679649
how do you get the volume?

>>59683708
i told u to kys earlier faggot

>WAHHHHH I HATE CHANGE
every time

File: pepe photostock old guy.png (72KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 900x900px

>>59683708
This

>>59683721
Hello moz://a

>>59679701
>>59679649
how do you make the tabs sit next to url bar?

My 5 year old loves the octopus. The rest is poop.

>>59683709
Plugins are literally the only reason to use Firefox. Removing the plugins removes their one and only competitive advantage.

>XUL works but it's "old" and not hipster compliant so we'll just throw it out rather than upgrade it

>>59678866
CONGRATULATIONS
FIREFOX IS FOR FURRIES

>>59678866
Oh look, it's more flat UI cancer.

File: 1335123949932.png (12KB, 237x287px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 237x287px

>>59683721
Get back to work on breaking your shitass browser so you can exit the marketplace already.

>>59678866
cringetastic

>>59678934
Checke'd and keke'd :^D

>>59683735
No, XUL is a security minefield and it has always been awful. Back in the old days they just shat out APIs for any old thing without a care in the world. Completely unmaintainable.

So when they're going into multiprocess they HAVE to rewrite the APIs just because XUL is so fucking bad. Now, they won't come out the other end with the SAME API but it will probably come out with more standardized equivalents.

They're not stopping with WebExtension compatibility but as for how long it takes to go from WebEx (which is designed for multiprocess compatibility) to something which includes all the powerful stuff they already had with XUL.... might be a while. They're still implementing more powerful APIs as we speak though, it's not some pipe dream or conspiracy.

Fuck this shit. Are there any good browser-based browsers that are tightly cloud-integrated with IOT support?

>>59683794
I think all browsers are browser-based, there's no such thing as a good IOT anything though.

File: SS_2017-04-01_57.png (468KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1920x1080px

>>59678866
Don't care, I customized mine to suit how I browse.

File: 1486346819647.png (33KB, 285x280px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 285x280px

>>59683794
>Are there any good browser-based browsers that are tightly cloud-integrated with IOT support?

I use Nightly by the way and yet I cannot find compatible dark theme.

>>59683824
So write your own unless XUL has suddenly stopped existing.

>>59678866
Why doesn't Firefox default to having tracking protection always on?

File: 1486346204621.png (129KB, 314x278px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 314x278px

>>59678866
>fixed width address bar

>>59683709
>breaking all the plugins and extensions is a good plan
Nobody ever used Firefox for the simple fact that it had all of those...

>As for UIs, who even looks at the UI? Move it the fuck out of the way so I can get to my content.
It's not like the UI is what the ~USER~ ~INTERFACES~ with to get to their content. Shitty UI = shitty experience.

>>59683936
There will be the possibility of rewriting addons for the new system but XUL simply cannot stay.

I just minimize the fuck out of whatever UI they try and stick me with and ignore the rest. I actively avoid interacting with the UI. Maybe the scroll bar (as an indicator, not for scrolling)

File: 2714c0c291281ee1d39a82837191f339cfbc6ea507752e306a6b58cf442affca.png (137KB, 480x352px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 480x352px

>>59679597
>he can't tell the shills apart from the anons

>>59678866
They have two options: either make their api stable or make a decent looking default.
I want them to make the api stable so I can just use my own theme and not care about what they do, but I won't go back to having my shit break once a week like when they switched to Australis.

Having a stable api is also good for business, so I don't know why they don't fix stuff before pushing it to users.

>Firecucks too retarded to realize April fools

>>59678866
>SJWare

>>59683813
It looks so light but those addons make it more bloated than ever

>>59684001
It's not, similar mockups were posted like a month ago, it's actually happening.

>unified search/address
You disappoint me /g/, why'd no one bring this up? Literally every address you type will get sent to a search engine now. B O T N E T
>inb4 you can disable it
The search bar by itself was really useful for autocomplete

>>59678866
Looks good. Similar to Simple White, that I've been using since forever.

File: whats his h#cking deal.png (175KB, 316x474px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 316x474px

>>59683677
Have a safe/popular link for the compiled version? I want to use this on mobile FF desu

File: 93f0b4662ccbf2c191d9bdcbae352a1f.jpg (155KB, 762x900px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 762x900px

>>59683677
>no HTTPS support

>>59684238
Well, it's literally injecting javascript into the page. What did you expect? I doubt anyone uses it anyway.
>>59684195
>python
>compiled

>>59684253
Didn't see that. Thank you, anon.

File: 1462392172559.jpg (19KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 400x400px

>>59679701

At least it still supports old add-ons, right?

>>59684162
>Literally every address you type will get sent to a search engine now.
It only sends it if thinks it's search. Any properly typed address won't be sent.

File: screenpostan.jpg (174KB, 1262x821px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1262x821px

>>59678866
jesus fucking christ the amount of fisher price on that wholeshitsale screenshot is a contender to xp's theme.

THAT'S RIGHT, FIREFOX WENT FULL RETARD WITH THEIR UPCOMING THEME.

the fact that it looks even more "kiddy" than goddamned Luna says a plethora of things about the current Fx design staff.

I'm so fucking depressed.

>>59684162
Are you like on version 4 or something?

>>59684337
Nah, thats what suggestions are and they should mandatory be disabled.

>>59684145
What addons, exactly? It's only Stylish and a GUI css that directly affects XUL.

>>59684437
>GUI css
what css is that?

>>59684465
The one I wrote with a shitload of display: none.

>>59684355
Oh I have that disabled.
I assume most on /g/ do too.

Would be nice to see the vertical tabs that they're meant to be baking in

>>59678866
The only thing that really matters is how it does shit.
And it does shit WRONG.

>>59679454
normalfags like it.
It seems less complicated to them that the old 3d complex shit we used before.

>>59684478
>post it or didn't happen

>>59679701
>search bar
That's not a search bar.

>>59683830
Soon.

>>59683845
Less jewbux for advertisers. They would throw a fit and stop funding Mozilla.

is the titlebar FINALLY colored on windows 10 instead of gray?
thank fuck.

>>59684556
>keeping window decorations on

>>59684337
How would it be able to differentiate?

File: Capture.jpg (18KB, 1743x38px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1743x38px

>>59684355
>Are you like on version 4 or something?
What? The latest stable version of Firefox has a separate address/search bar

>>59682393
Ungoogled-chromium, Iridium browser or Inox browser.

>>59684685
>if ("h" , "t" , "t" , "p")
>dont

>if ("xyz" + nospace object)
>pls dont = true

>>59684702
Yeah but Firefox has always crufted in old search methods. The address bar has been unified for forever, longer than there has been a separate search bar.

Still, the searches are parsed after the address parsing. You can also do shit like tag your search engines if you use multiples.

startpage = SP = startpage.com/whatever/q=%s

then

sp <search here>

It's not a big difference except one less fucking shit widget that's always been awful with their constantly rewriting the back end and then "securing" search engine files so you can't modify them easily, etc.

>>59684685
huerisitc

browsers are dead

>>59684713
what language are you paraphrasing?

>>59678866
I think it looks ok. I hope they don't go mad with the animations.

>>59678976
rund tabs help when you have so many fucking tabs that it becomes a saw edge

>>59678866
It looks like shit, desu. I've been using Firefox since the start but I'm just losing faith with each version. I've benn trying browsers since a few months and the only one wich could be a replacement is Palemoon, but it gets flickering with my system watching youtube videos and that is a total deal breaker for me.

>>59678866
not sure if april fools or not

>>59678866
Looks fucking retarded.

>>59678866
>rounded 3d back and forward buttons
>edgy tabs
>rounded search box
so fucking inconsistent

File: HSeK3A.jpg (158KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1920x1080px

>>59678866

they should hardcode the fucking rainbow flag everyhwere in their UX to celebrate diversity.

startpage should be tranny-gay-marriage.com

fireshit is the most secure browser and people who use it are cucks. even meme browsers like vivaldi are better.

>>59678866
>ugly chrome

optimized for touch screen bullshit

>>59679649
ugly and uncomfy faggotry dat is

>>59685513
>fireshit is the most secure browser and people who use it are cucks
pick one

>>59684831
>uses gnome3
fucking kill yourself

>>59685558
>doesnt use gnome3
you first

Those are mockups and they already look better than the current version

>>59684831
I want to know how you got your Gnome Web like that. It looks good.

>>59685580
>gnome3
>crime against humanity

File: image.jpg (20KB, 208x242px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 208x242px

do not want.

>>59685582
dconf editor org>gnome>epiphany>ui

>>59678866
Firefucks Win 10 Version.
What a cack-handed fuck-up

>>59678866
> Firefox needs performance improvements FAST
> Let's ignore that, add more bloat and waste resources

NEVER CHANGE MOZILLA!

>>59685513
>fireshit is the most secure browser
Anon I am pretty sure you are behind the news.
That was true 10-15 years ago when it went against Safari and IE.

But since Chrome appeared security deteriorated and nowadays FF is one of the first browsers to during the contests.

https://it.slashdot.org/story/16/02/12/034206/pwn2own-2016-wont-attack-firefox-because-its-too-easy

> inb4 slashdot
Shit site but the news stand.

>>59686043
Addendum: Checked Servo's repo this morning and found that there is really not much progress going on.
I wonder if it will ever become a thing.

>>59678866
Looks like dumbed down retarded shit.

Can imagine a room full of SV wankers talking about "user delight" and "onboarding" to make it more understandable for normies

I stopped using Firefox recently after a good friend who worked for Mozilla for 10+ years quit in March and told me how they were accepting under-the-table cash from Google which he didn't agree with.

On their latest android edition (52.0.2+) they no longer allow youtube videos to be played in the background. If you switch tabs, go into another app, look at your homescreen, etc.. youtube will stop.

Google paid Mozilla to disable this feature because they want everyone to pay $3.99 -$9.99 a month for their Youtube Red/Music service for the same functionality Firefox allowed for free!

Firefox was the only android browser which allowed youtube videos to be played in the background.

>>59686719
Anon if you didn't know Google kept Mozilla alive for years with the default search provider agreement. After all these years it would have been a scumbag move to refuse this offer.

Jesus christ why can't they just get rid of the fucking bloat? Or do the same thing they did when Firefox first started and start a fork.

Who cares just set it to your GTK theme

Why couldn't we make the chrome on browsers smaller? No one wants to look at it.

>>59678866
I wish they would just make it rock stable and lightweight. Instead they're adding more bloat that's going to up the CPU and RAM usage.

Soon I'll start to genuinely wonder if browsing the tubes is still worth the trouble. I'm already in the process of virtualizing Firefox so it's less of a pain in the ass. All browsers are either fucking garbage or botnet these days and Firefox is just the least worst, and normies don't even care.

Fuck this gay earth seriously.

>>59686776
Why is Chrome carbage?

>>59678866
Refresh button again on left side omfg

>>59678866
Gay as fuck.
Especially that unicorn, looks like retarded child's painting. Jeez.
Why do they keep messing around with what's already good?

File: tmp_18780-787aeb5da91eafdf010fe8390af0b165101d2de3340c37b12baae84b9f619910-681870765.png (907KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 1280x720px

hurr, Firefox bad, Firefox try to be like Chrome now

>ok, we are adding new features into Firefox (Hello and Pocket) so you can chat with anyone, anywhere without needing an account; also universal bookmarks.

BLOAT, FUCK YOU SJWZILLA

>we're also re-adding old features like vertical tabs

HA, HA, DAMAGE CONTROL. SJWZILLA IS FINISHED AYYYYYY

HURRRRRRRR, FIREKEK IS SO KEKING KEKERING THAT IS SLOWER THAN CHROME. MUH MEMORY LEAKS. MUH MULTITHREAD

>we're going to need totally remake the entire browser basically. We need to change the engine, since Gecko is a 20-year old monstrosity made of patches upon patches

>we also need to deprecate XUL since it doesn't allow for multithreading, the current reviewing process is too taxing, it breaks several addons every update

>also it's a security risk that allows for remote code execution

>WebExtensions are safer, has already thousands of developers and most of our addons are already ported. Also, we're adding support for some APIs to allow some developers to keep offering their addons

SJWZILLA STRIKES AGAIN NO MORE ADDONS FIREKEKS IS KEKING DEAD FUCK YOU SJWZILLA AND YOUR SJWCHROMIUM I'M GOING TO USE CHROME NOW

>we didn't fire Eich, he quit. We also do not want to take sides in these debates since we only care about an open Internet. Very few Mozilla employees actually wanted him to quit and media focused viciously on them so he decided to go

>you can be a part of our communiry regardless of your opinion on gay marriage. In fact, we don't care about your beliefs at all, we only care about the Internet

SJWZILLA IS A KEK COMPANY FOR VIRTUE-SIGNALING KEKS TUMBLRTUMBLRTUMBLR TRUMP SAVE ME

At this point you're just hating on Mozilla and their decisions to be trendy. Fuck you and your forced memes.

Retards.

>>59686798
Some new "UI expert" retard probably got onboard and proceeded to ruin everything and put it on the left for some certainly good reason but that completely overlooks the fact that sometimes people get used to things and maybe you shouldn't change things too much.

>>59686798
> using refresh button instead of f5

>>59686833
Cool pasta bro, but you won't trigger people like you did the first time.

>>59679454
I know a lot of normalfags who hate it

>>59686874
That's because they've learned to use Windows and when Windows changes, they no longer know how to use computers.

>>59678866
Looks fine. Way better than australis (which looks like shit).

I remember thinking that the australis mockups looked good too before it actually shipped, but I think mozillas problem is that they suck at polishing stuff. I'm sure Photon will also end up being an unpolished turd.

>>59678866
is that the mobile version?

>>59678975
B-but at least the cartoon animals is cute

>>59678866
I rarely am bothered by UI changes and actually liked the UI of the recent firefox releases compared to in 2013, but that is so fucking ugly, what are they thinking??

>>59685558
Gnome 3 with extensions is GOAT

however, that guy clearly doesn't have many

>>59678866
Welp! Time to go back to Palemoon

>>59678866
Its ok as long as I can restore classic look

>>59686833
delusion: the post
nice copy pasta tho

>>59678866
Wheres the button to donate to transexual bathrooms?

>>59686065
fug can anybody pwn me?

>>59686065
Security didn't exactly deteriorate, it just was obviously an unsecurable mess. That's why XUL's going, because it's not some sensible API with controlled points of contact with the OS. It's a million scattered points of contact with no sense applied over the course of decades.

The new XUL-like APIs beyond WebEx will be more maintainable/securable once shit starts getting sandboxed hardcore.

File: MICROSOFT People always hate changes.png (106KB, 1202x121px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1202x121px

>>59683721

>>59687425
>Securable
That's just a shit metaphor for "never powerful enough to support extensions that XUL could"

>>59687501
No. There's more coming than just webextensions, they'll just be sane unlike XUL. XUL is and has always been fucking awful. Just accept that addons will need to be rewritten but won't lose their capabilities.

>>59678866
>pacifying blue, furies for kids and freaks
dropped

>>59686884
like everyone on /g/

>>59678866
Can you make it more goofy?
>done goofed

I don't know about that, but what I do know is this new numbering system is fucking retarded

>>59688254
I don't even get why we need numbering or why it even matters, I just want to view HTML documents without all my RAM being eaten up along with my CPU and eventually get greeted with a crash.

I mean, I have about 500 tabs open at anytime but come on.

>>59686833
I don't check /g/ often but even I've seen this pasta before.

>>59687429
>windows 10 isn't a windows 8 rebrand

File: fug_this0.gif (2MB, 400x286px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x286px

switchin 2 emacs

They're changing it again?

I swear, they're like a fucking bucking bronco, determined to shake off the users they have

>>59682393
Emacs

File: 1484712362037.jpg (19KB, 462x483px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 462x483px

>>59678866
Why

File: 1490488525650-gif.gif (1MB, 444x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 444x250px

>>59678866
Time to make the switch.
https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

>>59690020
This has to be a April fools joke right? RIGHT???

>>59678866
This must be a joke.
I'm staying with pale moon.

>>59678866
there is literally nothing wrong with this

nice false flag thread and all those collected (You)s

File: SS_2017-04-01_13.png (78KB, 688x1024px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 688x1024px

>>59684516

>>59678866
Better than Australis, worse than Classic Theme Restorer.

>>59684336
no

>>59678866
Why is Mozilla so adamant about shitting up Firefox?

File: 1483908627773.gif (1005KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 180x180px

>>59691135
most mounds comes from g**gle, not users.

>>59691170
fak, mounds/founds

>Making a controversial announcement on april fools
They are testing the waters and depending on feedback pull a "J-Just a joke, we swear!"

But they will stay with it since most praise the shit out of it.

>>59679067
None. The only up-to-date and technically decent (well architectured and secure) alternative is Chromium, which contains hardcoded Google crap.

It's 2017. There are no good browsers. You can only choose between privacy (Firefox, customized) and security (Chromium). Personally I use a locked-down Firefox (no JS, no SVG, no remote fonts, etc.) for regular browsing and Chromium for JS-heavy sites that require too much fiddling to work properly in Firefox (most web apps).

>>59687546
>Just accept that addons will need to be rewritten but won't lose their capabilities.
Unless Mozilla will decline/ignore the request for a certain API

hmm, looks neat

is this available in the nightly builds yet?

>>59679067
Vivaldi

File: Untitled.png (148KB, 966x911px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 966x911px

>>59691410
>But they will stay with it since most praise the shit out of it.

because it's comparable to the old firefox theme (that classic theme restorer, well, restores) and to the firefox developer edition theme (that will be built in with firefox 53)

>>59691494
>no SVG
what's the problem with those?

>>59691494
Why not just use Vivaldi?

>>59678866
>so much padding
hope they kill themselves

"Do more with extensions" Too bad none of them will work anymore

>>59679454

They've done studies with computer illiterate types and have determined that flat themes are easier to use. Pretty much, if you make it look like paper instead of some 3d Holographic button people understand it better.

/g/ should make a browser based on the servo engine

Are there good minimalist FF themes\styles\whatever?

>>59693026
I use arc-dark firefox theme with htitle and I'm pretty happy with it desu

>>59692990
>They've done studies with computer illiterate types and have determined that flat themes are easier to use
Source, dipshit. I've also seen a study that said the exact opposite.

>>59692588
>>59692961
it's freeware, not open source

So, what version of Firefox should I anchor in on, to weather the storm? I'm not giving up my extensions until there are suitable replacements.

I've heard 47 and 52. Sites are regularly breaking on 32, so it's time to move on to the next safe harbor.

>>59678866

Another "It does not look like Windows 95 therefore it is bad" meme thread.

>>59693285
52 ESR will support legacy addons for the foreseeable future.

>>59693382
Thanks, anon.

>>59692774
i liked this logo

>>59678866
Looks like an unholy abortion of Chrome, Edge, and Safari mixed together.

>>59691967
in which case a fork might make sense, they might also decline a specific API request to merge that functionality in someplace else so don't just be a little bitch and assume they're oppressing you or something like everyone else.

>>59693285
Move to 45.0.1. I even prevented it to update.

>>59694593
Just say vivaldi.

>>59688322
Why do you expect to open 500 of anything and have it run well? Because it's in tabs and not windows? Web pages are way more complex than they used to be. Opening a webpage these days is basically like running Crysis. Would you expect to be able to run 500 copies of Crysis no sweat?

>>59688322
install nightly fucktard, and use the 64bit version

with lots of tabs is so much better

It doesn't look much different, honestly.

>>59694593
It looks identical to maxton des-

File: Untitled.png (515KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1920x1080px

>>59678866
it's funny how the rounded tabs are gone. They made such a big deal about how proud they were of them.

>>59685538
>uncomfy
show us how you do it.

I honestly like Konqueror these days. Need to fully train my adblock on it though.

>not using 28
>updating programs
get the fuck out normalfags

>>59693241

as if open source matters when all your hardware is proprietary..

>>59686719
what else did he tell you?

>One of the things that makes Vivaldi unique is that it is built on modern web technologies. We use JavaScript and React to create the user interface with the help of Node.js and a long list of NPM modules. Vivaldi is the web built with the web.

KEK

>>59698560
>react
>node
>npm
>managing cancer with more cancer
what could possibly go wrong

>>59698560
There was something memed a while back that did the same thing, but now its even disappeared from the search engines [spoiler]breach.cc[/spoiler]

>just installed Pale Moon for the first time
Holy shit. This is much faster than Firefox. What the fuck is wrong with Mozilla?

>>59699586
They have some really awful people on the frontend stuff. The backend is awful from decades of abuse, but the frontend problems are new and awful. Of course if you're an about:config guru regular firefox can run fine too.

>>59678866
noooooo... this was meant to be the alt-right choice of browser... now its full of libcuck speak and shit... what the fuck do we do now lads

>>59699661
Hate the company, use the product. It's not like you're paying those people, it's like you're stealing from them.

File: simplicity.png (317KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1280x1024px

>>59693352
It does not have to look like Win9x but neither does it have to look like phonetrash eye cancer.

>>59679619
the only good thing they've done in the last year was buying pocket

>>59700201
only cause all their other bookmark handling ever written has been shit since plain html

>>59678866
Nice, even more empty space.
Just what I always wanted