Why would anyone use anything besides the objectively best distro?

File: Debian.png (784KB, 2267x1763px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 2267x1763px

/thread

>>59674506
muh enterprise support

>>59674506
<yawn>

>>59674506
>using anything with apt
Once you use pacman you can never go back

I had to try a couple distros to fix a broken boot loader and all I can say is I dislike fedora and mint a lot more after using debian for so long.

debian has been nothing but issues since i started using it

>>59674506
>cause the install can't find my dhcp
Arch does by the way

>>59676914
mint does too

>>59674506

That's not Arch, Manjaro or Ubuntu. Debian packagers don't even their job right.

>>59677012
>arch

File: IMG_0047.jpg (8KB, 300x145px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 300x145px

install opensuse
or something rpm based
or arch
or gentoo
anything that doesnt use apt

File: debian wall.png (116KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 3840x2160px

bump for greatest os

>>59675032
Because you like the reduced the functionality or because -Sy[y]u is cooler to type than [dist-]upgrade (brackets not related).

Don't get me wrong: Archlinux fits my current usecase and I will probably stick with it (untill I have time to deal with distributed compilation for gentoo) on my PC.

>>59678706
Either apt is an unpredictable bitch, or the devs at Debian are retards for not posting any expected "strange behaviors" in advance, or the devs are simply incompetent. I lean towards the last two options because somehow Ubuntu manages to have fewer problems while using the same package manager.

File: 33797442.jpg (108KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 400x400px

>>59678706
Install Gentoo?

>>59678706
because apt is slow

>>59674506
systemd

Use Devuan instead