>tfw I don't understand OO design patterns

>>59673867
Dumb low-res frogposter.

File: 1490454468498.jpg (24KB, 600x484px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 600x484px

>>59673867
That's okay you can still suck dicks
Can you?

File: download.jpg (7KB, 251x201px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 251x201px

>>59673867
OOP

File: house-do-want_cut455_22k.jpg (22KB, 455x243px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 455x243px

>>59673908

>>59673867
please be more precise, we may be able to help you

>>59673867
>>tfw I don't understand OO design patterns
You really shouldn't bother.

Most "Design patterns" are just a way to get around the restrictions OOP places on you.

Want to check a variable? Either use an "if" or implement some obscure design pattern to get around the problem that getting objects to communicate with each other is a lot harder then it should be.

File: 59079279.jpg (43KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 250x250px

>>59674150
FOUND THE NEET!!

>>59674209
I am in university and actually """"learned""""" about design patterns in class.

>>59674244
yeah, ok and I'm Richard Stallman

>>59674578
?

Hi mister Stallman nice to see you here.

>>59673867
>I do not understand a computer model of real world interactions
nigga u dum

>>59674756
>>real world interactions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>real world
implying

File: 50186925770a88c987e2ad9560deabe9_400.jpg (12KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 400x300px

>>59673867
Neither can my boss and he always gets angry when I try to implement them.
Don't worry about it.

>>59674774
barMan.order(Drink.ICE_TEA).pay(getMoney(1, Currency.EUR));

implying implications

>>59674812
That is not a design pattern.

That is syntax. (with questionable code quality)

You can do the exact same thing (a weird function call) in a functional or procedural language.

>>59673867
Start by reading the Greeks. OOP works very similiar to Plato's theory of Forms.

>tfw Observer design pattern
>Static observable everywhere ;)
>Global search is the only way I navigate around the project

>>59674150
>to get around the problem that getting objects to communicate with each other is a lot harder then it should be.

That's not true for every object oriented language -- just the shitty ones that don't support multiple value dispatch. CLOS, on the other hand, allows for tasteful object oriented programming.

>>59673867
You'd make the same face if you did understand them.