Stop using nonfree software

>>59670951
There are no free software for my dildo

>>59670951
so you endorse pirating software.

no you fat old communist jew fuck

>>59671095
I can't wait to hear this logic explained.

>>59670951
Stop being fat.

>>59670951
Stop using software

>>59670951
I aready don't use non-free shit.

File: wayland-screenshot.png (216KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1920x1080px

>>59672544

>>59671095
Pirating proprietary software is bad, because it's proprietary!

>>59672115
>average winfag comeback

>>59672556
Fuck you, slavic shit.

>>59670951
there's no professional, useable free software for media Content creation, so, no, i won't.

>>59670951

Stop eating things off your feet.

>>59670951
Recommend me a premium paid version of Firefox

>>59673134

Blender, GIMP, Kdenlive, Audacity.

Troll smarter, not harder.

>>59671099
this

>>59673163
openshot, pitivi maybe, davinci resolve now

>>59673184
oh that last one's nonfree, but still good enough to ditch the windows for if the massive amount of others aren't.

>>59671099
found the uneducated underage

>>59670951
Can u at least appropriately crop the image if you're going to post this everyday?

>>59673222
Found the literal retard.

>>59673222
found the gender studies major

I'm trying Stallman Sensei, but it is an unconventional and at times inconvenient path.

>>59672556
>/ukr/
Greetings from Olgino, motherfucker. rm -rf yourself.
>>59670951
Sorry, i need android studio for my job, but it's the only one nonfree piece of code i run on my pc (except games), i swear.

>>59671099
You say "communist" as if it was a bad thing or an insult!

>>59670951
Tell everyone to encode everything into Vorbis/Opus

>>59670951
already running parabola gnu/linux-libre
feels good man

>>59673163
good luck producing printable 4c pdf or multimedia ebooks with this selection of hobbyist tools.

>>59674609
libreoffice is fine on any OS. i have no fucking idea what a '4c pdf' or a 'multimedia ebook' is, but it's probably something awful.

>>59674609
>multimedia ebooks
what are those

>>59670951
If free software were good I would.

Open source is evil. Closed source like windows 10 is pro white

>>59674893
Depends on what you're after, free software is the best in a lot of areas.

>>59670951
Maybe I would listen to this fat fuck if he looked like someone I could take seriously. I may not look absolutely gorgeous, but I at least take some pride in my appearance.

>>59675044
Taking pride in your appearance is taking time off from the fight against non-free software. That is the face of a dedicated ascetic. He is a monk.

>>59674933
Yeah fair enuff, though someone who's the target market for the areas where free software is worth it, probably wouldn't care about this stupid discussion in the first place.

>>59675111
By taking care of his appearance he would appeal to more people who do the same, which would help him in the fight against non-free software.

>>59670951
I don't think so.
free software doesn't usually fit my needs/workflow as much as propietary software

>>59673163
>professional
>Blender, GIMP, Kdenlive, Audacity.

choose one

>>59675466
what did he mean by this?

>>59675466
Blender is relatively popular for pros actually.

>>59675491
For pros who can't afford the real deal yet.

>>59675509
Nah, blender's top tier. Doesn't always do everything as well as specific other tools for specific jobs though.

>>59670951
I didn't pay for windows 10! Microsoft let me upgrade for free :D.

>>59674715
PDF you need to print books, newspapers, Posters, basically anything. 4c = CMYK. you need at least indesign or quark xpress for those.

>>59675662
Ah, so what you're looking for is TeX?

>>59674873
ebooks based on 300dpi pdf, enhanced with multimedia content like audio files or video clips. they're used as school books in 1st world countries.

I love when people claim that "professionals" need nonfree software.
A professional chef may use a fancy set of knives, but they don't suddenly forget how food works without them.

>>59670951
Unlike you autismo I have a job

>>59675688
Nah, they are thinking more in the domain of something like Scribus.

>>59675690
Sounds terrible.

>>59675695
>I love when people claim that "professionals" need nonfree software.
Name a OSS/libre alternative to indesign, photoshop (capable of handling 300dpi cmyk Images) and Acrobat/distiller to create printable pdf for offset printing. go ahead, tell me what i've missed the past 12 years since i'm in Publishing.

>>59675719
>Sounds terrible.
they're actually quite popular among students and teachers alike since they're platform Independent and easy to manage.

>>59675688
try doing layout efficiently with TeX
protip:you can't

>>59675829
I don't know how you're going to do anything math related "efficiently" without it, but since it's an open and portable format it should be easy to mix into anything. Exporting to any dpi pdf is really arbitrary, I imagine anything can do that.

>>59675688
>>59675829
tex is okay for math composition, but for anything else it's a time sink hole. you can create a layout in indesign in a fraction of the time and give it to any type Studio to do the Job. and yes, some simple Things can also get done with MS word.

>>59675876
>>59675862
Equations are made with MathType, MathMagic or MathTools

>trying to stop people from using non-free software
Let them use it.
Non-free software is the cancer with itself as the cure.

Like Microsoft with Windows 10 becoming increasingly frustrating to use.
Like Adobe accidentally killing Creative Cloud for an entire day.
Like Apple being stubborn with compatibility and artificial restrictions.

Let these people learn on their own.

>>59675876
Yeah I've never done actual publishing so I guess Scribus or an office tool would be fine. Better if you can drop your math tex in there.

>>59675962
>efficiently

Attention: vrms is the best way to verify that your system is fully free.

>>59676011
https://libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines#vrms

>>59675999
>Scribus
>PDF/X-3
sorry, we're already past that. also, checked!

File: 842.png (23KB, 200x401px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 200x401px

>>59671099
>mfw right now

File: Larissa Zuckergate.png (598KB, 843x629px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 843x629px

Stop enslaving users with GNU licences

>>59676034
I don't understand your statements, you can always output to pdf

>>59676048
He's right, though. (((Stallman))) is a fat communist jew. He's openly communist, he's obviously fat and his name is Jewish.

File: proprietary_software_is_cancer.png (35KB, 1077x251px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1077x251px

>>59670951
Imagine if math proofs were proprietary.

>>59676082
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/X - we're using X-4 right now and demand of our contractors to deliver in X-4, so scribus is out.

>>59676142
>>59676082
(scribus is only supporting X-3)

>>59676142
>>59676154
K well that is pretty fucked then. I imagine there's a solution kicking around somewhere but that would no doubt be ugly. I think a lot of freedom devs are allergic to CMYK.

>>59676256
>I think a lot of freedom devs are allergic to CMYK.
yeah, because to them "Desktop Publishing" is sending a document to the Desktop Printer. we would LOVE a real competitor to Adobe, but since they pretty much btfo Quark out of the water and swallowed Macromedia, there is nothing much left to work with. and unfortunatly, "it just werks".

>>59676348
Well the libre stuff started from bullshit closed off printers, it makes sense. Publishers and Freedom are fundamentally opposed. I've used several books published in *TeX and they're all perfectly fine. As for weird alpha shit in a PDF it doesn't really affect me anyway. I'm sure it'll be settled in a short amount of time
>before adobe pushes the standards one more step out of their reach

I wish I could but I have different priorities.