Workstations require 8c..

>>59670589
Why post this thread again? There's another one >>59668331

Got BTFO again?

File: file.png (284KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 882x758px

>>59670743
>DELET

>>59670589
>>59670774
Hahaha, nice same fagging

>>59670774

Did someone request another dump?
>>59670112
>>59670132
>>59670143
>>59670160
>>59670169

File: Intel.jpg (599KB, 1312x1740px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 1312x1740px

>>59670823
Keep up the good work, BTFO those shills

>>59670589

>Trying to shit on Ryzen
>6900k 8c/16t is still lower than 7700k
Oh wow

File: file.png (320KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 552x661px

>>59670823
>>59670835

>>59670886
>He said, without his tripcode

>>59670823
>>59670835
>>59670892
literally kys samefagging manchild. That image is hilarious. The first OP is literally me and then you accuse some chinese guy there or something with a tripcode that he is supposedly a samefag.

Jesus fucking christ. You need medical help. Or just kys.

>>59670589
>>59668331
friend. why dont you post newer benchmarks with updates bios and higher clocked RAM

>>59670913
>le shitposting another duplicate thread XD

File: amd1.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59670589
B-BUT MUH CINEBENCH AND 7ZIP

>>59670589
>>59669531

>day one tests
I wonder who could be behind this post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSuIJECsePA&feature=youtu.be&t=238
Here's a dude in Vegas getting up to a 28% boost in rendering times by moving to faster memory.
Not only are most of the day one benchmarks useless because they're ran at 2133MHz, none of them have the updated BIOS/AGESA
Worse yet, a lot of those are ran on that shitty crashy ASUS

>>59670823
do it, Intel babies need to get BTFO again it seems.

>1800x was made to destroy the 6900k
>it succeeds

wtf is wrong with you man children