audiophile thread
post sneks & pebbles
>>59659241
>>59659241
Are those plasma arch speakers?
Looking for a turntable on Craigslist but it takes patience to find anything decent... I've been needing a new table for a while now and I'm slowly thinking of caving and buying new. The project debut carbon seems to have good reviews in my budget. But I know I could get way better bang for buck with a used table. What do?
Also, any vintage turntables that you guys prefer? I've been keeping my eye out for technics, pioneer, and thorens, then looking up details on the model.
>>59659241
I can only imagine how pure the sound is on that setup.
>>59661617
I'm sure it makes up for being 52, having no hearing, having no wife, no kids and being a fucking virgin.
>>59661617
>omnidirectionals
>in a room like that
pure like the sound of a fart in across a hallway
>>59659912
jesus anon
>>59659912
Question is, whats in the snek?
>>59661858
depleted uranium
>>59661858
foam with high static property's and lies.
>>59661929
Apparently it ships at 7lbs.
That is the most disgusting man-made object not designed by HR Geiger.
>>59659241
Ob.
>>59659912
>>59659241
iuu
>>59664339
What does an RS-232 cable have with audiophilery to do?
>>59659241
http://sound.whsites.net/amp-sound.htm
>The biggest problem is that no-one really knows what an amplifier will do when a reactive load reflects some of the power back into the amp's output. We can hope (without success) that the effects will be negligible, or we can try to make speakers appear as pure resistance (again, without success).
>Because these figures are so rarely quoted (and I must admit, I have not really measured all the characteristics of the 60W amp in Project 03 - open loop measurements are difficult to make accurately), we have no idea if amplifiers with poor open loop responses are responsible for so many of the failings we hear about. It is logical to assume that there must be some correlation, but we don't really know for sure.
>If THD is quoted without reference to its harmonic content, then it is quite possible that two amplifiers may indicate identical distortion figures, but one will sound much worse than the other.
http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-best-speaker-cable/
>We could, though, repeatedly pick out which cable sounded better and have that pick consistently be the same cable. This was the only result so far that we were confident in.
How do i get the output from my pc to go to headphones and speakers, and choose what output goes to each device?
>>59665255
plug them into the proper ports? if you have realtek, install the driver and use the control panel's multistream features
>>59665131
They are funny, I trust leddit more than /g/ thought.
>>59664478
it is being used to connect the two units of the Resolution Audio Opus 21 CD Player
one unit has the power supply
the cable is high purity silver strands and the D sub plugs are Amphenol gold plated copper
>>59659241
autism
>>59659241
dafuq am i looking at
>>59666297
that looks like a fairly normal stereo
>>59659241
Delete this
>>59666331
sorry my Mcintosh amps are at my other mansion.
>>59664157
This guy really isn't overboard though just looks silly
Can I get some audiophool cables that are actually digital
>>59666547
good goy
>fell for the safety razor meme
>it doesn't irritate my skin, but it also doesn't give me all that good of a shave, even with multiple passes
Fuck that, I'm done with hipster bullshit. Luckily I learned my lesson for $20.
>>59666547
>audiophile cables
>>59666297
looks okay senpai but a cheap 2 channel receiver is far from audiophile.
>>59665532
>steampunkfags are onto audiophilia
Just when I thought it couldn't get any worse.
>>59659241
I have a Little Dot Mk1+ amp.
Bought an audiophile Burson V5i opamp for it.
It is absolutely terrible. Inferior in every way to the cheap Chinese one it came with. It is noisy as fuck and has a constant buzzing noise.
>>59667496
Chink-Fi is really a blessing.
Shit stolen form slavs /g/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMD7T6t_snY
>>59660065
Dude buy at least a semi auto turn table, yes the project ones are nice but full manual.
One of the best back for buck turntables around is the Denon DP300, it is full auto.
I'm using a 40+ year old Dual 1226, which is luckily in really good condition. Took me some time to get it working again, all the grease inside the mechanic hardened and the rubber parts fell apart. Thats the thing with old turntables, you have to out work in them.
>>59667165
Not a cheap receiver. Sony ES is high end stuff, its just mine's not a home theater unit so its not as boss.
It was cheap for me though, got it as a gift. And all in all that entire setup cost me a total of $20 so I'll take it.
>>59667738
They really screwed me on it. It was like $50 and then they had the balls to charge me $15 for shipping. It was a fucking envelope.
When I complained about quality they said to spend $20 on shielding.
>>59667810
>20$
put it on ebay and sell them individually.
I once found a kenwood hifi amp the dumpster, i cleaned the pots to sell it as refurbished. It sold for 170$
Working, big hi-fi amps are 100$ easily on ebay.
>>59667907
Yeah, I've thought of that. When I get a better receiver I will be selling it.
I just brought home a simple mini Sony CD/aux/ipod shelf stereo for 10 bucks at goodwill, cleaned it up and attached some spare speaks I had around. Sounds good. Not """"Audiophile"""" but good.
Found a Technics receiver/cassette in a dumpster and after some cleaning used that thing for a few years too.
Goodwill stores are great for this kinda thing.
>>59667628
This is intended as humour right?
It's not actually someone stating that the distance the cable has from the ground affects the sound the speakers output?
>>59668126
I'm not from where you're from apparently, so what are goodwill stores?
>>59659912
The power plug gets me. Inside the wall it's standard romex cable.
>>59668336
don't you want your sound signal completely freed of those pesky dieletrics on your floor?
>tfw I am an audiophile with a golden years.
I love my Little Dot Mk1+.
Though I can't say tubes are really all that worth it. The only ones that sound any different are the stock ones and they sound like shit.
>>59669543
Forgot my pic.
>>59666185
Kinda looks like a PSB Stratus Gold..
I have them too, only in dark cherry.
Laugh all you want, the conoisseur know what's up.
>>59666779
what's their excuse for this gold plated optic cable ?
>>59671195
>>59671208
can you at least provide some attempt at translating the frog?
>>59671208
>Installing your own electrical pylon
Is there a guide in English how to transform your PlayStation 1 into an audiophile station? I've seen so many variations of them on YouTube but any search brings me to ruskie websites or French
>>59671429
It's a prank. See >>59671195
>>59671208
>using windows integrated file copy system reduce the quality of the sound, use ultracopier when moving flac files on your hard disk
my sides went singularity, i cant believer that the rotational velocidensity went outside the meme realm
>>59671442
It's not a prank if they're actually using them on youtube
>>59671456
many teardowns of the so called "audiophile" ps1 has shown that it use a really cheap DAC
>>59671456
as stated here, >>59671195 the """audiophile""" Playstation (SCPH-1001) actually just use a DAC that worth 5 bucks. Also, the optical reader just isn't good.
>>59671469
>>59671476
sometimes simple is good
WMO is worth $5 too and it's still one of the best mice ever made
I like good quality audio, I hate audiophiles.
Hence I wired this setup up using wire I bought at walmart for $10 and I bet it sounds the same as those...whatever the hell those cable things were.
>>59671515
1994 cheap dac mean cheap early tech, which mean very low performances.
>>59671561
>Not liking snek cables
>>59671561
>falling for the tube meme
>vinyl
>ipad source
>buying the cheapest speaker wire
just buy the snake already holy shit
>>59671634
HAHAHAHA no.
>>59671242
It makes the bits bittier.
>>59666195
Kek, what channel os that
>>59671738
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L34S4Tt1EuQ
So basically just get a little dot?
>>59671561
But the snake is better
Buy it or I will kill you
>>59671795
Tbh it sounds kinda tinny, but to me it sounds more like the fault of that free jazz song than the headphones.
joke got even in anime at this point
more
>>59672050
this isn't 4chan.fr, we don't speak french
lickée le baguette bitch
>>59659912
>>59661989
Pathetic
>>59671561
>I like good quality audio, I hate audiophiles.
>uses tubes
>>59668349
Stores that collect and resell donated stuff for outrageously low prices for those with no or not enough income to speak of.
>>59671795
Yo, Guai Lo ...
>>59668349
>>59675273
This.
You can find really great obsolete or vintage electronics that people get rid of for low prices.
>>59671561
Aren't the macintosh 240's mono amps?
>>59678298
>Aren't the mcintosh 240's mono amps?
Fixed.
>>59672084
>>59672072
>>59672062
>>59672050
>frogspeech
>>59666533
Are you fucking stupid? Those "Reference" cables probably cost more than your PC.
>>59659241
>>59663747
actually laughed out loud
>>59665532
How do Gregorian chants sound on that?
>>59671573
1994 is not early for DAC tech.
>>5967156
>bare floors, no carpet, no bass traps, too close to the wall behind
nigga have you heard of acoustics before?? I guess you don't need any treatment since the vacuum tubes are warming up the sound
>>59671195
>>59671208
They're saying all of these are shit. The Headphones logo is a quote from someone praising it and the Eye logo is the magazine saying it's bullshit.
Audio related but not audiophile specific question:
I need a new stereo receiver, my old one is probably fried (Going to replace the fuses just to be sure, but they look fine so it's probably just dead). I need 130W for LR front channels, and I don't want to spend $500 on it.
Is there any realistic chance of finding some old used thing for like $50? I went to a local pawn shop today but they wanted $80+ for all of them and most of them were only 65W/channel
>>59674504
gotta hand it to audiophile scam artist engineers, they design some nice aesthetics
>>59666297
>using an equaliser
>>59671195
>Placebos acoustiques
we should use this phrase more often, sounds fancy just because it's french, but still pretty clear what it means
WHAT DOES THOSE FAGGOTS LISTEN TO
>>59680469
anime intros
>>59667810
It looks to be from the 90s yet I bet it is <100w channel and only has analog inputs. It was high end for circuit city.
>integrated fm reciever
>good
>>59681312
>hurr durr more watts equals better
What the fuck is this shit? This thread made my fucking eyes bleed. Any piece of copper wire will do, good god. Y'all motherfuckers need Moleculo
>>59681453
I think it's kinda funny
it's like a parallel world where the laws of physics aren't allowed
neither is common sense
>>59659241
>>59679503
I remember when these guys just made DAC's
>>59667442
>steampunk
is this bait?
>>59681453
it is an analogue signal, there are differences between wires
just because a $4000 snake isn't useful doesn't mean that spending a dollar or two extra on quality wire doesn't make sense either
>>59682149
noice
>>59682149
Sauce?
>>59682149
>half speed record
Wouldn't that make it sound worse because there's a lower data rate?
>>59683645
akiba's trip
>>59681329
it is, especially when they are high-feyedelity™ watts. Being so poor you didn't even have a dac or dolby pl for your dvd player
>>59659241
is audiophile a mental illness ?
>>59683814
It makes it easier for the cutting needle to cut high frequencies?
RIAA correction seems to be problematic though.
>>59683831
Thanks m8
Machina Dynamica's Teleportation Tweak
Long-Distance Audio and Video System Enhancement
The Only Audio Product that doesn't Require Shipping
http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina60.htm
>>59682149
is there an anime for anything?
>>59683853
only if you pay new retail
>>59681312
Within The SONY LINE it was a good receiver (not as good as other ES products like >>59667810 pic) and its solid and sounds great for the time being so I use it. Also it was free.
I really don't give a fuck about what is considered audiophile and isn't here I just took a pic of my setup because it was next to me and I thought the OP was looking for pics of other anon's stuff so I shared mine, but I now see the sneks were the real topic here and I have no sneks just a nice bargain home setup.
also why the fuck would i want to use the integrated fm on any receiver anyway? I don't listen to the fucking radio through a receiver.
>>59674504
i could use one of these for my usb ports because they interefere with my audio
>>59684628
>nice
desu ne
>>59684628
>>59680469
https://open.spotify.com/user/cylonnl/playlist/7gP6LVrR1OAjTI1yjTrv2h
>>59682322
At those frequencies, the only thing I would care about from a wave propagation perspective is to have a fat wire to lower the resistance.
On the small signal side, shielding makes sense though.
> joined the club