More like this, please.

>>59655741
This cant be real

File: 741b.jpg (77KB, 595x688px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 595x688px

>>59655770
>he doesn't know that 102 is an odd number

>>59658456
wat? this is complicating what's easy

>>59658502
I actually had a female friend in my course and she's currently in the 4th year (in a 5 year course) and she's 26 (she entered college when she was 18). And she programs like that.

File: 1485301465168.png (149KB, 828x801px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 828x801px

>>59655741

>>59658962
>wat? this is complicating what's easy
you dont get this thread do you

File: maximumkek.png (122KB, 700x1787px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 700x1787px

Behold: the true way to compare two numbers and find the larger

>>59658456
>>59658962
This is not just more complicated, this is also plain wrong: According to this, 3 < -1.

>>59659097
don't forget, when they're equal, hes returning bool_v3::tralse

>>59659119
I dunno. I'd be tempted to use this part of it.

>>59659010
>(float)6

I hope this is fake

back when I first got into programming -- with no prior experience -- I wrote a fizz buzz solution in bash because of a '95% of /g/ can't do this' thread. I posted my solution to gloat, despite it being awful.

Fast forward in time, I'd improved in my fundamentals and was browsing a thread like this and I saw someone post my fizz buzz scrot. I recognized it as mine and was able to laugh at how retarded I was.

What I'm getting at is, code that anyone writes is going to be laughable when they're new. Post a snippet of some code that you first wrote if you're so brave.

>>59659010
>all the logic in one Update()

>>59659373
Doesn't change the fact that shitty code is funny and refactoring shitty code is fun

>>59659085
Too hard

>>59659894
>SHA1
SHAT

>>59660261
From a quick glance, this looks like a sleep sort, the best sort algorithm there is.

>>59659010
Is that for real?

Does C# not have switch statements or some shit?

>>59659010
Is this real?

>>59660456

of course it does, the author is just an idiot

File: kode.png (157KB, 1311x1055px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1311x1055px

>>59655741

Thanks /g/. You never disappoint.

File: Untitled.png (18KB, 880x303px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 880x303px

>>59660508
has 115 followers

File: kek'd.jpg (10KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x200px

>>59660697

>>59660697
Impressive

>>59660697

>typename std::vector<T>::size_type i = 1;
can somebody explain for a sepples virgin?

>>59660261
Better watch out cause >>59660446 is about to steal your job.

I have more sleep sorts, but I can't find them on my work pc.

>>59660697
>fast_sort
>unbounded runtime
nice meme

what if there was a natural phenomenon that sorted stuff for you? say you have an elaborate system of chutes with ramps and holes and you drop a bunch of cubes of various sizes and they come out sorted

so if you could simulate this system you could sort anything in the time it takes to simulate it

File: Totally_ok.jpg (208KB, 1319x606px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1319x606px

>>59659010
Is this truly yandre sum code? Haven't bothered to download the game.

>>59659373
Here's the first function I ever wrote, its not much but it's mine

float Q_rsqrt( float number ) 
{ 
long i;
float x2, y; 
const float threehalfs = 1.5F;     
x2 = number * 0.5F;     y = number;     
i = * ( long * ) &y;
i = 0x5f3759df - ( i >> 1 );
y = * ( float * ) &i;     y = y * ( threehalfs - ( x2 * y * y ) );
return y; 
}

>>59658456
>return tralse

>>59661162
Didn't know you programmed doom 3.

>>59661217
Hehe yeah that was me. nice 2 meet u

>>59661195
>get tomorrow date
>sleep
kek, made me laugh

>>59661262
You're my first (You) ever senpai

>>59661248
Likewise.
Check out a function i made :PP

int printNumbers(){
int number = 0;
int i = 0;
while(i < 100000){
System.out.println(number);
number = number + 1;
i = i + 1;
}
return 0;
}

ihih, I'm such an haxzord :P

File: 1412851993617.jpg (19KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 480x480px

>>59661307

>>59660902
its just a size_t aka a long

File: dafs.png (536KB, 809x834px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 809x834px

bool checkTrue(const bool& expression)
{
    if(expression == true)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else if(expression == false)
    {
        return checkFalse(expression);
    }
    else
    {
        std::cout << "What is happening?\n";
        exit();
    }
}

bool checkFalse(const bool& expression)
{
    if(expression == false)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else if(expression == true)
    {
        return checkTrue(expression);
    }
    else
    {
        throw "SEND HELP!!!";
    }
}

>>59661403
Do this:

bool checkTrue(const bool& expression)
{
    checkFalse(expression);

    if(expression == true)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else if(expression == false)
    {
        return checkFalse(expression);
    }
    else
    {
        std::cout << "What is happening?\n";
        exit();
    }
}

bool checkFalse(const bool& expression)
{

    checkTrue(expression);
    if(expression == false)
    {
        return true;
    }
    else if(expression == true)
    {
        return checkTrue(expression);
    }
    else
    {
        throw "SEND HELP!!!";
    }
}

I believe it will work.

File: learning-python.jpg (25KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 350x350px

>>59661473

>>59661195
L/2
Catch exception
Fucking kek

>>59659360
>>59660456
>>59660467
>>59661138
It's real, unfortunately.
The way I've heard this was made by one of his furry friends, but I'm not so sure about that...

File: sosorry.webm (2MB, 1502x807px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1502x807px

>>59659373
it is not a snippet anon but it is mine

>>59661195
getTomorrowsDate won't even compile

>>59661339
What an idiot, Windows 9 also starts with "Windows 9" - when was this written? Must have been before Windows 9 came out.

>>59661774
im not sure what kind of bait this is but i'll take it

>>59661510
what is the purpose of this toy
the ball will just hit the floor

>>59661774
>>59661339
This bit really fucking annoys me.
Fucking retard developers should not be catered to.
Microsoft should have just done Win9. Everyone else has had to suffer upgrading shit even from Win7 to Win10, so should those retarded Java devs.

>>59661869
It's not a toy, just some tracks from a racecar track probably. (likely 2 unrelated ones at that)

But a toy that actually was level at those 2 disconnected joints between the tracks could be used to improve hand control and joint health in (former) lazy people or those with injuries.

File: NICE.jpg (24KB, 335x430px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 335x430px

>>59660697

>>59661869
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0

>>59662011

What the fuck is this syntax?

>>59662063
It's Python. Ain't gotta explain shit.

Even LOLCODE is more acceptable.

>>59662063
welcome to python

>>59662090

it looks useful, I just don't get it
What is the logic behind the [::-1] thingy?

>>59662153
-1 is the step so I guess it is the same as the C for loop (integer i = 100; i != 1, i = i - 1)

>>59662153
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/509211/explain-pythons-slice-notation

>>59662199
>>59662153

>>> s = '123456789'
>>> s[::-2]
'97531'
>>> s[::2]
'13579'
>>> s[::3]
'147'
>>> s[::1]
'123456789'
>>> s[::-1]
'987654321'

>>59662153
Short-hand, default parameters.
A lot of languages allow you to skip groups of parameters if you specify at least one of them somewhere. (or some let you skip all of them)

I'm sure in Javascript, you can make an infinite loop with for(;;)
In this case, you are just giving the print command a shorthand slice

>>59662220
>>59662199

Huh, that's pretty neat. I knew you could slice, I just never knew you could control the steps.

>>59661616
and then syntax error

>>59662063

IN MAI datetime GIMME date LIKE DATE

SO IM LIKE FIBBING WIT N OK?
    LOL ITERATE FIBONACCI TERMS LESS THAN N /LOL
    SO GOOD N BIG LIKE EASTERBUNNY
    BTW, FIBONACCI LIKE BUNNIES! LOL
    U BORROW CHEEZBURGER
    U BORROW CHEEZBURGER
    I CAN HAZ CHEEZBURGER
    HE CAN HAZ CHEEZBURGER
    WHILE I CUTE?
        I AND HE CAN HAZ HE AND I ALONG WITH HE
        IZ HE BIG LIKE N?
            KTHXBYE
        U BORROW HE

IZ __name__ KINDA LIKE "__main__"?
    COMPLAIN "NOW IZ" AND DATE OWN today THING
    IZ BIGNESS ARGZ OK KINDA LIKE 1?
        N CAN HAS 100
    NOPE?
        N CAN HAS NUMBR ARGZ LOOK AT 1!!
    GIMME EACH I IN UR FIBBING WIT N OK?
        VISIBLE I

How many of your comp sci class are completely retarded /g/? 50% of my classmates didn't know the difference between 1++ and ++1 even after an entire lecture dedicated to this

>>59662455
why is random language features part of a comp sci class?

>>59662063
Pyyyyython

>>59662476
We were learning the fundamentals of C during our first year and each lecture was dedicated to singular shit like for loops or structs

>>59661081
Nature comprises chaos chaos means you know nothing. Chaos-free methods, or reduced-chaos methods (like heuristics) usually perform better. We could use simulated annealing or Dawkins weasel or GA for anything, but since we have perfect information that nature does not have (since we defined our own chaos-free universe model which is math) we can do better without involving nature.

File: lost-the-game - you just lost it.jpg (32KB, 410x333px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 410x333px

>>59662455
Not compsci, but software dev 2005.
I went on a train for 35~ minutes twice a day to go to a place that was hopefully going to do a year 3 there instead of a much further University.
The only condition was good numbers for it.

Not only did 90% of my class fail those 2 years, the college I could have went to that was 5 minutes bus away also mostly failed.
I could have just went fucking there instead of the train.
The others in that class though, holy fuck they were dense as shit. Typical brogrammer types.

Still, worth it for that little nice family café and the lecturers.
The lecturers were top-tier, we (the non-retards) all went out at lunch to this café together pretty regularly.
I miss college sometimes.
We even played pic related on a last day before holidays and shared copies of downloaded TV shows and shit. They gave zero fucks about piracy. One of them even had access to a large supply of cheap USB sticks. Still have that today.

File: 2dd.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>59662569
>One of them even had access to a large supply of cheap USB sticks.
it sounds comfy but my botnet senses are tingling

>>59662455
What's retarded is you writing this bullshit when 1 isa fucking rvalue.

>>59662590
Oh no they are fine.
There was just a fuckton of them bought for some reason and he just sold them off for cheap during classes.

Same with floppy disks, but they gave them away for free.

>>59659085
>using sleep sort to find the maximum
this really activates my almonds.

>>59662220

This is a really nice, concise explanation of how to slicing steps. Good job!

>>59662063
X[::-1]
X[start:end:step_size]
X[(omitted, so start or array):(omitted, so end of array):-1]
X[from start to end in index steps of -1]
Python indexes wrap btw, X[-1] is valid and is X[len(X)-1]

>>59662595
Sure if you want to be autistic about it then yes its retarded, the point is they don't know shit about something as simple as the increment operator

>>59662695
Neither did you, so why do you think you have the right to call your peers retarded? Huh, retard?

>>59662695
dude you are just as as retarded

>>59662841
>>59662914
So writing 1++ instead of i++ is retarded when you're only illustrating a point?

>>59662960
was so hard, dumbass

File: 1487046351919.jpg (32KB, 694x801px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 694x801px

>>59655741

>>59659010
>>59661590
Wasn't this decompiled code?

>>59662960
The only point you've managed to make is that you got put in the special compsci class for special retards where they don't teach compsci and instead have an entire lecture for every C operator. And after every lecture 50% of the class + 1 more student (You) leave STILL not understanding how to use these operators correctly.

File: long boy lennin.jpg (179KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 600x600px

>>59659010
>(float)6

>>59656168

$ echo $(( 51 + 51 ))

File: yandere.png (2MB, 2672x6068px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2672x6068px

>>59663071
Even if it was, how does that excuse all of the nested and chained if/else statements?

>>59663071
No.

File: 1++.png (466KB, 1336x804px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1336x804px

>>59662455
>>59662960
>>59662695

>>59663135
Fuck you're right I'm retarded. Going to drop out of my major tomorrow

>>59663257
Because the compiler literally turns switchcases into those. They exist solely to make the uncompiled code redable.

>>59663071
If anything the JavaScript was unpacked from the unity 4 executable.

>>59663414
Read the code, anon
Besides the input.getkeydown() if/else on the right column, all of the if statements consist of multiple different checks that are unique to each if statement. That shit can't be from a switch.

>>59662063
>[::-1]
It's pick up one character one by one from the right (-1 indicates it).

File: 17263781236.jpg (55KB, 991x902px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 991x902px

>>59661195
>getTomorrowsDate()
>it literally waits untill tommorow and calls another function
>1000*60*60*24
my sides hurt

>>59655741
Max lvl program skill

File: 59663690.jpg (528KB, 3072x2463px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 3072x2463px

So uh what's this meme called

>>59664169
meme degree

>>59664169
cs grad meme

>>59664188
Not like there's any other type of degree

>>59655770
Probably no one does that but I've seen my coworker did something like this before >>59659010.

>>59664169
retard code

>>59661195
I'm simmering with rage, now. This code is fucked!

>>59659894
This can be helpful to avoid loop overhead, its called loop unrolling. GCC only does it when you specify -O3 so I can see why they did that.

>>59658456
too intelligent for binary logic, ternary instead,

>>59662476
They do this at state schools. At places like MIT they concentrate on information theory, etc. At CMU, I don't think they even teach OO programming anymore until junior or senior year.

>>59667527
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4071690/tell-gcc-to-specifically-unroll-a-loop

Sure it's not portable. My bet is that those macros require constant expressions, so can't be placed in a loop.

>>59662498
idiot

>>59662001
lol

>>59660657
115 NuMale beta followers

>>59663414
>because the compiler turns switches into those
The decompilation does that actually.
Deciding if you had a switch or an if is hard.

But in this case it's doing string comparisons. It was initially like this. No way to make a switch out of this.

>>59660508
>comments
Comments are for dumb people.

>>59670059
>No way to make a switch out of this.
are you trying to say you can't do switch with Strings?


from the C# spec
>If the type of the switch expression is sbyte, byte, short, ushort, int, uint, long, ulong, bool, char, string, or an enum-type, or if it is the nullable type corresponding to one of these types, then that is the governing type of the switch statement.

>>59670179
Try writing the equivalent switch. It's the best way to realise your mistake.

>>59670219
What mistake? Switch is ideal for situations like this.

>>59670430
>switch is ideal for string comparisons
anon are you even paying attention

File: 13900455_10210165252437824_115618790_n.jpg (24KB, 502x474px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 502x474px

>>59662498
Hey. Nothing wrong with that one.
Have you ever heard of Webpack ?
They just minimized and compressed the html code.

>>59670489
what's the issue with using a string in a switch statement? Go on, explain how it's a bad idea compared to this alternative of a giant if/else structure.

>>59670547
Provide an example of how you think that would work exactly

There is no reason he should be using strcmp in the first place, he should be using enums

>>59658456

Funfact:

Databases actually use tenary logic..

>>59670691
What kind of pointless information is this?
Not all databases are the same.

>>59670868

Every DB I know uses ternary logic.

false = (! true)
true = (! false)
null = (! null)
true IS NOT null
false IS NOT null

Yes, the negation of NULL is also NULL.

So "tralse" is not that far fetched, because NULL is a logical value, but beyond binary logic.

>>59669442
>>59670500

>taking the bait

I see, summer is comming

>all these pictures apply to me

Fuggg

>>59660697

I like how it uses "++i" and compares "array[i] == array[i-1]".

>>59671103
Implying I'm a summerfag

File: 1478132750131.jpg (53KB, 600x593px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x593px

>>59661616

File: 1467938039325.png (154KB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 3000x3000px

>>59663266
I had to read that twice to realize what the problem was
My sides

File: 1460933155927.webm (205KB, 600x406px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 600x406px

>>59671043
C# actually allows for nullable booleans, likely as a result of LINQ being so deeply tied into databases.
Ternary logic is actually incredibly useful a lot of the time and I'm disappointed more language that have default boolean implementations don't allow for null

File: 1467937905007.png (36KB, 1515x663px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1515x663px

>>59671156
That actually shouldn't matter because the third statement in a for loop is executed on its own. i++ and ++i are equivalent in that step of the loop.

There is NOTHING wrong with any of these unless you're some sort of retarded white nationalist trying to enforce your stupid colonial attitude in code.

File: 1467937717008.png (32KB, 694x446px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 694x446px

>>59671383
ok

>>59671396
Looks more like a stub than anything. But I prefer noop stubs.

>>59658502
What's the proper way to this, just running it through a for loop correct?

>>59672114
Just convert the string into an integer dumbfuck

>>59672114

 GUI.cards[a.getLabel().toInt()-1].setDone(true);

Replaces everything visible in that picture.
Rookies often make these mistakes. But the use of a GUI is concerning. You should figure this out by the time you start doing gui.

>>59672228
Also member functions suck. Look at how ugly that is.

>>59672114

int i = (int) a.getLabel();
if (i>8) { i=8 };
GUI.cards[--i].setDone(true);

>>59672228

You were missing the last "else" clause.
We don't know if there's more options (maybe 8, 9, 10..) that also change "GUI card 7"..

>>59672272
>the last else
Assuming you're talking about the innermost nested else. The last else is an assumption that if a.getlabel() doesn't return the strings containing the strings for 1-7 it contains "8".
My code does the right thing in that case.

This person's code does make it more difficult to understand what's going on so I can't really fault you for being confused.

>>59672272
>>59672316
Ah wait I get it.
I assumed by the manual nature of this scheme that that is a bug.
But you're right.
>>59672246
Replicates what I presumed a bug

>>59672316
>>59672337

To be fair, the programm _probably_ works like you expected, with the values 1-8. That's why your code is good (if there are only 8 values), because you immediately see there are no edge cases or something wierd.

I just wanted to be nitpicking that we can't tell from the graphic alone.

>>59662321
Thank you, you made my day!

>>59660508
>having to update your code every year

Holy fuck I thought I was a good programmer (I began/started taking it seriously last summer), but looking back on things I did last year I want to barf in my mouth

>Me making a 300-line method for a graphing calculator
I want to go back in time to kick the shit out of me
https://pastebin.com/rZ6mmviL

>>59660456
I mean, you shouldn't use a switch for this either. The `Witnessed` variable is apparently referring to some sort of Event. The behavior for determining the subtitle and game over cause can be decided based off of the event type, which will make the update logic much shorter and robust.

*Anytime* you start having tons of consecutive conditionals, it's time to consider abstracting the behavior away so that the more abstract logic is clear and the mind isn't boggled down by the particulars.

>>59674614
> if(EquationSelector.formattedJTextFields[0][1].getText().isEmpty() && !EquationSelector.formattedJTextFields[0][2].getText().isEmpty())

I'm already done reading

>>59675185
what's wrong with this

>>59675126
It's referred to as cyclomatic complexity. You should do CI on your code, and have a cyclomatic limit warning/error to make sure you're not going overboard like our friendo yandere dev.

>>59667527
Macro loop?

>>59661904
>so should those retarded Java devs.
users, you mean

>>59661904
wait, people actually did this?

>>59670565
Not him but ffs:

switch(this.witnessed){
case "Weapon and Blood and Insanity"
...
case "Weapon and Blood"
etc.
}

>>59676359
Yes. This was literally the reason for Microsoft skipping a whole number, shitty Java devs using that sentence in some form.
It was in a large amount of software so they just skipped it instead of saying "fuck you retards you should have thought about the future" like they did to every other dev that decided to suck the dick of MS APIs.

>>59663257
>retards don't know SWITCH is literally IF statements covered in sugar.

Code is still a fucking mess, but seriously.
Also, it's called a game. Games tend to have heavy use of chained interactions. Especially when it comes to, you know, AI and interaction.

>>59676880
It'd be much more readable with a switch case though, or by chaining ifs since several cases produce the same effects.

>>59676785
>>59670565
>>59670547
>>59670489
>>59670430
>>59670179
>>59676980

Let's face it, that code is a complete mess anyway, switch or if.

It has combined witness events but only single reactions. (insanity reaction in the 3 weapon, blood and insanity)

This whole chain if reactions to witnessing events could be combined in to a handful of lines and reactions from a file or array.

Also, the most important question, where's blood and lewd reaction?

>>59671318
-1, 0 and 1

Don't be stupid.

File: 1489248674494.jpg (36KB, 655x527px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 655x527px

>was always afraid of programming, thought me being bad at math means I can't do it
>had a rough start through test automation, started learning php and js
>turns out it's more or less logic + syntax + enthusiasm and time
>6 months in
>still feel the immense shame for the code I wrote even like a month ago, rewrite everything I run into

Please tell me it gets better, tell me there's a plateau of being educated just enough that you don't make the stupidest of mistakes.

>>59661361
size_t is the maximum unsigned integer that can run on your platform.

meant for iterations and accessing through indexes and the like.

>>59677024
>Also, the most important question, where's blood and lewd reaction
That method is 2000 or so lines longer, it's lost around there somewhere.

>>59676880
i don't know much about that, but i think it's just a hoax produced by some memster trying to reason the skipping the '9', which was just clear marketing move without any real substance.

>>59677263
Makes you wonder why he never just made generic reactions based on a counter going past a threshold.
Then just incrementing those counters with any instance of witnessing the triggers.

This way you eliminate a fuckton of IFs and replace it entirely with checks on each trigger.
So you'd check if bloodThreshold > MAX_BLOOD_THRESHOLD or something like that
This is how I've done stuff like that before, even with text messages and such all saved in an array, concatenated together if necessary.
I wrote a very basic concat function to handle the combining properly with decent punctuation if I remember correct, it's been a few years.

I can understand doing that when testing out a few conditions, but the entire thing?!
Fuck that noise. Too many conditions to check, gotta step back and simplify.