>tfw x86 is still not dead

Who cares about standards anyway, right?

>>59623423
>TFW ARM sucks for servers

File: 1240393095655.jpg (71KB, 639x595px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 639x595px

>PowerPC died
>x86 still lives

>>59623423
What's wrong with that? you DO know that modern x86 is a completely different architecture than x86 was years ago, right? Modern x86 CPUs are completely different designs, they're simply binary compatible.
Performance per watt, I'm sure a G4600t could beat any given snapdragon.

>>59623472
>what is RISC-V

>>59623575
>>PowerPC died
Only for consumers.

>>59623828
It's a problem that it's basically the only architecture that's economically viable for desktop use right now.

>>59623975
No?
>I've never heard of arm linux boards
alternatively
>it's not a desktop if it's not windows+proprietary software

>>59624026
Those aren't for desktop use nigger, way too weak.

And even 2 desktop archs are too few.

>>59624069
They're also not available in desktop-standard form factors with PCIE and all that.

>>59624069
i was typing out a long elaborate post but instead I'm gonna call u a dummy

File: Processor_families_in_TOP500_supercomputers.svg_.png (1MB, 2000x1422px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1422px

What's wrong with x86? Super computers use them.