THANK YOU BASED INTEL
>>59622834
But what are the yields? Ah yes they are nonexistant.
>>59622834
>>59622972
10nm Cannonlake Xeons: Cancelled
>>59622972
>>59622996
JUST SHRINK MY SHIT UP SENPAI
x86 IS FINE
>>59623035
>x86 IS FINE
Why do people think that manufacturing process has anything to do with the ISA?
>>59623075
>people
first time seeing anyone mistaking node shrinks for instruction sets.
>>59622834
Impressive? Any way we'll see it outside of 2 cores by 2019?
>>59622834
According to Intel's own internal feature sizes, which I hope aren't bullshit, it's a 28-30% shrink roughly.
Which I guess falls in line with 14>10nm