> see an interesting blog article > search how the guy

indeed, because all the most interesting and thoughtful blogs are run by mediagenic gods and goddesses. like pewdiepie, for example. how can you trust ugly people?

>>59615329

ugly homo detected

Fact is that me reading your blog takes my time and energy. If your thoughts, the sum of your brain activity results in you looking like that then I'm not gonna touch your thoughts with a 10 foot pole because failure is the end result.

>>59615329
ugliness is nature's way of pointing out broken people with bad genes, and by extension, bad ideas

>>59615346
>>59615351
you both fat failures would be proof of that right?

>>59615386
>bad genes, bad ideas, and now bad posts

thesis confirmed

File: Richard.jpg (47KB, 610x400px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 610x400px

>>59615386

let me guess, you have real inner beauty that just needs a chance to shine?

How am I able to reliably intuit whether an author has a mustache?

>>59615346
Nobody will ever care about your opinions.

>>59615319
Fuck off to facebook if looks>content to you.
>>>/out/

>>59615481

the CONTENT of your brains decides your looks
if your CONTENT produces a fat slob then I reject your CONTENT.

>>59615319
>>>/soc/

>>59615436

this thread isnt about intuition, it's about doing your due diligence before committing your time to content that will never be worth it.

>>59615319
Femanon detected.

>>59615498
>the CONTENT of your brains decides your looks
no it doesn't u fucking retard also physical appearance is secondary

File: fat.jpg (112KB, 1100x673px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1100x673px

>>59615590
>physical appearance is secondary

Ok lets see your physical appearance, I bet it's anything but secondary.

>>59615319
>I judge a book by the cover
Intelligent.

>>59615329
Being good looking is a skill like any other, easy to learn for smart people. Retards do look like retards because they're retards, it's that simple.

>>59615498
That's why we don't listen to all those ugly doctors and scientists like Hawking

Well, maybe you don't which is why you're such an idiot

>>59619374
Oh wow he managed to write a couple of pop sci new age books, he must be so SMRAT!!!!

File: hawking_ai.jpg (48KB, 610x407px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 610x407px

>>59619374
>He's listening to Hawking