AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7 7700K Whats better?

Straightened my back. thanks

Only game and suck dicks: Intel
Be productive, get shit done and maybe game casually because that's what grown people do: AMD

>>59616101
/thread

7700k if your top priority is max fps in dota.
1700 if you're adult.

>>59613761
Gaming-7700k
Workloads-1700x

>>59613829
me too

>i7 is better please stop listening to shills AMD's chips are slower and more expensive in every benchmark that isn't cinema-bench or specifically targeted by BIOS settings to gimp the tests
>AMD is also not stable

>>59613761
Priority on games from the last 2 years and a majority of games for the next 2 years*: 7700K@5ghz
Everything Else: 1700

>*depending on Scorpio final specs, if it's 8core Zen, it's game over for quadcores.

>>59613761
GOLEM GET YA GONE

>>59613761
6900k

>>59616433
Gonna piggyback off of OP, I do a lot of video capturing and streaming through PCIE and USB capture devices, while I'm sure either would do it- which will handle rendering with something like H264 better?

R7 1700 60hz 1440p
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/xBrmKZ
$1445
>vs
i7 7700K >75hz 1080p
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/MKhKbj
$1570

>>59616399
>max fps in dota.
holy fuck fag detected

>>59616612
no one cares about your shit channel so whatever you do to record footage does not matter at all.

JUST BUY THE DAMN 1700 ALREADY.

>>59616936
haha frickin nice one you roasted that guy i wish i was you

>>59616612
>which will handle rendering with something like H264 better?
Ryzen 7 1700. By far.

>>59616612
>which will handle rendering with something like H264 better
Ryzen 7 1700 will shit all over the 7700K in parallelised tasks like H264

>>59613761
1700

More cores, socket will have a way longer lifespan than the intel equivelent, more future proofing, more efficient

>>59613761
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-7700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700/3647vs3915

(In before the same day one benchmarks that've been spammed by shills for weeks now)

>>59616494
>>*depending on Scorpio final specs, if it's 8core Zen, it's game over for quadcores.
Pretty much already confirmed from multiple sources, and the PS4 pro has 8 cores, so why would Microsoft do less when they're trying to compete? https://www.google.com/search?q=project+scorpio+8+core

>>59613761
Intel makes a better product.
AMD has a better price point.
You need to ask yourself "is this extra performance being put to use?"
The answer is almost certainly no from a user experience perspective.

>>59619248
>userbenchmark
that shit is only accurate for hard drive speeds, are you fresh off the boat from /v/?

>>59619836
>intel makes a better product

but they don't

File: 1458171280185.jpg (14KB, 298x312px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 298x312px

>>59616101

>>59619963
I've benchmarked plenty of my own shit using it and it shows raw performance pretty well. Still better than Geekbench and Passmark.