>this would crash windows and linux Why is mac so based?

>>59605714
>Linux
>Using trash
Wew

File: explorer_2017-03-27_17-58-00.png (15KB, 344x387px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 344x387px

>not doing this to all drives

>>59605714
lunix is trash so it deletes itself lmoa

I use trash-cli and this works fine for me. Should be the same for anything that uses freedesktop trash, right?

>>59605714
Unless you are deleting the entire system, how can you crash linux by deleting stuff?

[citation needed]

>>59605858
OP is a faggot in trying to imply that deleting close to a million files will somehow make Linux/Windows fuck up somehow because they can't count that hgih for some reason

File: 1476634842848.jpg (193KB, 1138x1292px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1138x1292px

>>59605714
Windows users couldn't deal with that many files. Most of them are mental nutjobs according to Microsoft.

>>59605714
How?

File: 1782418534.jpg (25KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 200x200px

>>59605714
AHahahahahah
>Linux
>Using trashcan
If I want to delete something, I use rm like any SANE persons
Ahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaah

>>59605714
Tested and didn't crashed. Why Linux is so based?

>>59605911
so he is just pulling sit out of his ass?

>>59605987
Yeah basically

>>59605949
lmao wut, could someone explain this to me?

>>59605965
t. GitLab Employee

>>59606025
Shrinking free space makes windows manchildren sad.

File: 1490499727573.jpg (22KB, 212x307px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 212x307px

>>59605965
One day you'll make a typo.
>linux doesn't have srm

>>59606119
>one day i will die
Use shred.

>>59605714
Bullshit and you know it.

>>59605781
>display confirmation dialogs

fucking winbabbies lel

>>59605714
I forgot about this Linux bug where you can only delete 849,496 items

>>59606225
Shred doesn't work on modern file systems.

>>59606335
Linux confirmed for botnet

>>59606366
Then """modern""" filesystems are shit.

Because BSD, because UNIX. Think of macOS as a very aesthetic and very stable Linux distro optimized for your specific hardware. Its computing bliss. Of course, you can even run Linux native applications on macOS pretty easily, the wonders of POSIX.

Windows is fucking cancer and needs to die, thankfully its committing suicide with Windows 10.

>>59605714
False flagging?

>>59605714
>Linux
No, rm can handle as many arguments as u give it

>>59607788
It can't handle TREE(3) arguments.

>>59605714
what are ya talking about? every lignux distro i've tried has handled huge drives (in raid and jbod modes too) and all manner of operations on huge amounts of files on those drives with ease. i've seen os x choke from time to time, and all version of windows choke many times.

i deleted over a million files on windows a couple of weeks ago

>>59605714
no it wouldn't

>>59605911
>can't count that high
>mac can't even count to two buttons on mouse

NO RIGHT CLICK

>>59607788
>rm can handle as many arguments as u give it
This is not true

>>59609167
The '80s called; they want their slur back.

>>59606335
yea it really sucks man

>>59609167

>NO RIGHT CLICK

You know that's a joke, right? You're not that dumb, right?

>>59609208
it's as real as linux & windows not being able to delete meme amount of files

>>59609191
Just deleted more for testing purposes. This bug doesn't exist or there is workaround that i used.

>>59609277
impossibru comrade
OP said it exists

>>59609168
touch 1 2 3 4
rm 1 2 3 4
Did i miss something?
You can give it a too long argument, but that's not 3 or bash fucks up standard input.

>>59605714
>this would crash windows (OPERATING SYSTEM) and linux (OPERATING SYSTEM / KERNEL)

>why is mac (HARDWARE) so based

please compare windows & gnu & linux all to OS X and not mac, thanks

>>59609315
Try to run "rm ./*" in a directory containing a million files

>>59609364
The hidden root increase your privacy? :^)

>>59609433
Wanna try again in English?

>>59609474
cuck

>>59605714
Why would it?
Also, "mac" isn't an operating system.

>>59609150
It's pretty pathetic lie about this sort of thing.

>>59609532
>Also, "mac" isn't an operating system.
Reddit called they want their pedant back.

>>59605714
if that's OS X deleting itself, it's about it's only good use.

File: 09117667.jpg (85KB, 604x539px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 604x539px

Why are macfaggots so desperate to prove that that their joke BSD GUI is so superior

>>59609560
It just shows how incompetent you are, and how little you know about technology.
Now fuck off and kill yourself.

>>59609364
That's not an issue of rm but of bash (or rather the execve call) and I think limited to 1/4th of physical ram or something weird.

>>59609586
They're all unemployed so they go to starbucks and shitpost all day

>>59605714
Here's an easier way to delete all your data. https://www.howtogeek.com/198043/how-to-merge-folders-on-mac-os-x-without-losing-all-your-files-seriously/

>>59609640
macshitters blown the fuck out

>>59609364
argument list too long

cuz of the kernel limitation on *

you have to use a for loop to delete that much shit in the terminal.

File: negro the creator.png (54KB, 202x200px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 202x200px

>>59605714
>849,497 files
well sorry i empty my trash at the end of the work day like any fucking sane person does

>>59609599
>>59609672
https://linux.die.net/man/2/execve

>>59609672
the wildcard isn't matched by the kernel, but by the shell.
Which can have limits on it.
The thing where the kernel limits is the execve call, which has a hard limit for the argument size.
Or you delete the directory with rm -rf instead of listing all inputs.

>>59609640
>hit replace
>surprised when folder is replaced
Can windows fags not read?

>>59606047
Underrated

>>59609681
It was hundreds of thousands of java classes for testing static analysis tools.

ls -l | wc -l
789985

rm -R test/


works fine?

>>59609715
800k is when it starts getting hairy.
Any OS can handle a meager 700k.

>>59609715
xfs would be triggered, but ext4 is ok with it. Both are used in datacenters for a reason.

>>59609672
>kernel limitation on *
Are you retarded?

>>59609741
wew lad
>>59609812
how many arguments it can have.. it says right in the docs I linked.

>>59609869
no doc linked anywhere
the limit isn't even on arguments but total size of the argument string.

whew lad

No, it wouldn't, ext4 handles large filesystem transactions better than the stinking trash that is hfs+.

>>59609899

>>59609690

>>59609914
That has nothing to do with *.
You still haven't linked any relevant documentation to the claim.

>>59609902
Stop parroting Linus.

>>59609701
Actually the button says merge if you press Opt.

>>59609943
>it's wrong because it's been said a lot!
Amazing counter-point, but unfortunately I know hfs+ sucks from working on it. My company decided to do backups of vital data on a mac mini with hfs+.

File: 1486094293170.png (456KB, 696x938px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 696x938px

>macshitOS

>>59609946
I don't get why apple hides stuff like that, how am I supposed to know when to press option.

>>59609899
>>59609914
I see it like 5 posts up retards
rofl

>>59609975
Sad.

>>59609999
Nice quads.

>>59609935
That wasn't me, but neither were 2 other posts.. so it seems I don't even have to fight my battle since everyone sees your retarded shit
enjoy your mac

>>59609999
If you had a very poorly implemented feature, you'd hide it as well. It doesn't merge in sense you're used to, merging folder A into B on a mac will put all of A's new stuff in B, and for any conflict (like A/file and B/file) it will always replace with the version from A instead of prompting you for a choice like any sane OS.

>>59609975
>if it doesn't work like windows it's broken
kek

>>59609975
Replacing the directory is more natural.
If you want to combine directory contents you should just enter the one you're moving cmd+A to select all then drag drop them into other directory. Or use rsync or ditto.

>>59610010
That documentation is about execve, not the '*' wildcard dipshit.
Also he's wrong, it's not the number of arguments, but the total size of the argument string passed to the application.

>>59610023
my retarded shit? It's you (or the other idiots) that can't keep the wildcard and syscall arguments apart.
Or read the manpage and see it's not the number of arguments.

god why does /g/ get more and more illiterate by the second?

>>59610072
>apples and bananas goy

>>59605714
Ubuntu can't copy multiple large files. Just try to copy a folder with like 5 3GB files to a flash drive. It will lock up nautilus.

>>59610099
linux file copying & moving is it's weakest point, no arguments there.

that's why nemo etc have a queue when copying files from multiple locations to multiple locations because moving / copying files uses 100% of the drive bandwidth with the default schedulers

>>59610035
It doesn't let the user choose what to keep.

>>59605714
Mac isn't based, it's gay and thus degenerate. Linux is redpilled.

>>59610099
I never had this issue on fedora, I've moved around 10GB dirs with no issues.

>>59610153
Hi /pol/.