>have ssd & hdds
>ssd is by itself
>hhds are raided
>do not want to cause unnecessary wear on ssd
>want most of os to be on raided hdds
>researching on 'advanced' tech guru forum
>find someone else's similar question posted
>some idiot had answered this question thusly:
'"/" and swap on SSD, "/home" (and any other files) on RAID'
>mfw idiots recommending placing your swap partition on an ssd when hhds are available
Seriously, is it not retarded to have your swap partition on your SSD when you also have at least one mechanical HDD?
Why wouldn't you want it on your SSD other than space requirements?
>>59598162
SSD has limited number of writes/rewrites.
Swap is basically short-term scratch paper for when the OS runs low on physical RAM; as such, it may get hit with more writes & rewrites more frequently than any other partition, drastically shortening the length of time until data cells start getting stuck and become unusable.
>>59598151
Old SSD's would have been grinded to death by a busy server swap partition, modern ones not so much.
I know a lot of people using SSDs as L2ARC cache on zfs file systems and it works very nice.
One thing to keep in mind its to back up ''/'' to an HDD from time to time in case of sudden death, Samsung SSD's locks themselves to a read only status when they die, but only through the current session, after a reboot they commit sudoku.
>>59598192
>SSD has a limited number of writes/rewrites
top fucking kek, we're in 2017 not 2013.
SSDs can withstand constant writing of TBs of data per day and last a whole year.
your average Joe wont "degrade" his SSD just because he put his swap file on it
>>59598292
A finite number, no matter how high, is still a finite number; as neurotic as you may perceive my choice here to be, I still decide to eliminate unnecessar writes from my SSD.
>also post I referred to was from liek 2012 lol
>>59598192
Toss the SSD from 2008.
>>59598717
Spoilers: Everything in your computer has a finite number of uses. Better start downclocking your CPU so you don't run out of cycles.
>>59598727
It's from 2016 -- 500gb hynix -- and I want it to remain operational for a long time.
>>59598868
Already did -- downwatted it to 45w, too.
>>59599528
Have you started hibernating too? Cell mitosis is also limited.
>>59599883
kekd
Instead of accepting the general lifetime of a product you're trying to prolong it thereby making it uncertain when it will fail and thus highly unreliable in time. Congrats on the autism