Which web-browser is overall the lightest these days?
netsurf
>>59575673
KYS is the best web browser ever
>>59575690
Why even post cringe shit like this
>>59575673
Qutebrowser, the older gen of lightweight browsers are basically completely broken now.
>>59575721
read >>59575690
Iridium
barebone chromium
>>59575746
LOL !!!
>>59575727
>Qutebrowser
came to post this
no plugin support though
long way to go till then
>>59575857
luakit also, and all the text based browsers like w3m, lynx, elinks...
>>59575880
Nah, they're all basically abandoned at this point. Qutebrowser's in active development and moving away from that same shitty webkit lib that made them all suck.
lynx
w3m masterrace. it supports image files
>>59575673
netscape
>>59575934
links is actively developed
>>59576347
is it? neat. I was going to say Lynx is probly "developed" but I doubt they get more than one or two releases per decade.
>>59575687
This if you want under 100mb ram usage. I would use it as my main browser if you could just download images with it. I should try it with the other non-gtk interface
Finally switched from chrome to Firefox. Feels good.
>>59575673
I like Surf (SuckLess) and Luakit (outdated). But the problem also comes from very poorly written websites. Facebook for example.
>>59575727
>Qutebrowser
>based on Python.
>lightweight browsers
>>59577052
>poorly written
It is cancer but is weel written, anon.
>>59577183
Its actually based on PyQt5 which is hardware accelerated and written in C++ I imagine.
>>59577183
> I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about
> Also I can't and will never be able to program myself out of the toilet that is my life
The stuff that needs to be performant is written in C, from the Qt project you colossal retard.
I wish Dillo would hurry up and implement https.