ITT: Times when AMD destroyed the competition

>>59567725
At this point someone at intel clicked that the pentium m was the future.

File: tvtkbtb.jpg (374KB, 2400x2000px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 2400x2000px

>>59567720
>>59567725

>please jerk me and my fanboy narrative off
no
>>>/v/

File: 1440838797372.jpg (129KB, 731x646px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 731x646px

>>59567849
So I get to pay out the ass for DDR4 that can actually run at 3200 to 3600 MHz to get equal performance to 7700K? How high can DDR4 theoretically go and will the performcae gains scale?

>>59567725
but but no one plays at that low REZ

FAKE NEWS Fake news!!!

>>59568315
not sure, on that note, I personally am getting 32gb of ddr 3200 with crappy timeings because amd responds better to mhz then timings+mhz

The way I understand the cpu works, the shit that interconnects everything is clocked to half ram speed, and as long as it supports it, it can clock as high as it damn well pleases.

32gb of 3200 is 230$
Id i honestly thought 16gb would be enough
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/ZFgPxr/gskill-memory-f44000c19d16gtz

but then again, I would wait for motherboards to get sorted out, asrock claims 3766+oc now, when they use to claim 3200+oc
by the time everything is sorted there, you will also have the ram coming down in price.

>>59568325
um... not sure if you are retarded or not, but that's from when doom 3 came out, and doom 3 was built for 640x480 I believe, possibly 800x600

>>59568346
Yeah I'm sitting on the sidelines until summer to upgrade, my current 3570K will suffice for now until we can see how much potential Ryzen has.

>>59568359
at the time Doom3 came out 1024x786 was the "HD" resolution, you went to 800x600 if you didn't have the hardware and 640x480 was for potatoes

>>59568398
Mate I had a 1600x1200 screen in 1999, that wasn't HD

>>59568359
Doom was built for 1600x1200.

>>59568398
I had a 2048X1536 CRT in 2001, so no 1024x786 was not in any way "HD" at the end of 2004.

Hell the 360 came out 1 year later and that could output 1080p on it's own.

>>59568398
Are you stupid? 1024x786 was considered bare fucking minimum at the time, standard was along side of 1600x1200

File: 1451238103676.gif (8KB, 500x180px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 500x180px

GO AMD GO !!

YOU CAN DO IT

>>59568359
You have to be 18 or older to post here.

>>59568525
Soon was build for 1648x1234 you young punk

>>59567725
that's a lot of pentiums

>>59568346
that's a lot of latency anon, why not something a bit lower?

>>59568542
og Xbox had 720p/1080i capability

>>59568623
Yeah you need to stop faking, Doom 3 has specific hard coded resolutions, with the highest being 1600x1200.

For any non "standard" resolution you had to go to the config files.

Shitposting just for the sake of shitposting here?