qBittorrent is a meme

>>59562239
Stop being a bitch and use what works for you.

>>59562239
Why did you stop using Deluge if everything was working perfecty fine?
And of course it's a problem on your end. Do you think qbit would be so popular if it froze when you dragged the window?

Switch back to Deuge, then.

>>59562305
Switched because of all the recommendations on here.

>>59562239
>freezing and crashing
this never happened

>He doesnt use transmission

>>59562239
>Freezing and crashing
I can only assume it was some wonky windows build since the people that come up with these sorts of errors always tend to be fucking shit up systemically.

>>59562328
>he uses transmission

File: 1344114761815.jpg (17KB, 227x222px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 227x222px

I used Qb and none of those problems happen to me.

>>59562343
this

File: 1444829710126.png (125KB, 350x352px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 350x352px

>>59562325
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH GOD HE ACTUALLY LISTENED TO /g/!!! AHAHAHAHAHA

>>59562239
The only reason I don't use it is the ugly ass UI

>>59562325
Don't tell me you also bought a Thinkpad and a pair of "programming socks"

OP here, seems to be happening when I start torrents using magnet links. Really surprised nobody has had this issue.

>>59562367
The UI used to be fine when it was in its "almost like from the late-1990's" phase. More recently it went all mid-2000's glossy and "slick" on us.

>>59562397
I really want their UI to be like the uTorrent 2.2.1 UI, it's literally the perfection

>>59562395
The only issue I've had with magnet links is another instance of qbittorrent starting when one is already running.

File: Screenshot_2017-03-25_00-05-34.png (32KB, 919x600px)

32KB, 919x600px

>>59562397
>glossy and "slick"
wat?

>>59562694
Not gonna lie, those borders within borders within borders are fugly. Is that a gtk client?

>>59562694
Why is black

File: Untitled.png (13KB, 492x429px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 492x429px

>>59562325
What recommendations? The qB shill has been largely quiet after having been repeatedly shown screenshots of qB failing to connect to peers that uTorrent 2.2.1 sees just fine.

I don't know what version qB is on so I don't know if you're hitting a new bug, but you should avoid it for the STALLING issue regardless. Also the high CPU usage (which Deluge suffers too.)
Try uTorrent 2.2.1. Make sure to turn off updates so you don't get the 3.x crap. 2.2.1 is accepted on every major tracker; it's lightweight, stable, doesn't do anything stupid, and just werks.

>>59562770
It's also riddled with security features. :^)

>>59562770
Let me tell you about the one bug I ever experienced in qB, long ago one of the default configs was set to allow WAY too many connections at a time and would flood out basically the entire internet connection with the overhead of an infinity number of connection attempts.

Other than that, no problems. There's options for the (micro)TP and other things within the configs. With or without options like that it has almost always just werked.

>>59562727
It might not be the prettiest thing ever, but it's hardly glossy or slick. It's Qt.

>>59562730
Because I like it that way.

File: giphy.gif (98KB, 250x186px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 250x186px

>>59562770
>uTorrent

LOOOOOL

>>59562859
Weird, I got mine set up on KDE and it doesn't look that

whitespace'd

I've always had autism for border width though.

>>59562770
>using outdated software that lets tons of randoms connect to your computer
wew lad

>>59562770
>the STALLING issue
>the high CPU usage

neither of these happen

>>59562929

The Stalling meme will never die on /g/. Never mind I've used it for 3 years and never seen this supposed stalling.

>>59562901
screenshot or gtfo

>>59562938
I used to have it on a failing drive. I might have sparked the meme.

>>59562822
I've tested qB several times over several different recent builds and can watch IPs momentarily show up and then drop with nothing transferred. Load up uTorrent 2.2.1 and it connects and downloads from those same peers just fine.
qB can connect to some (and perhaps most) peers so in a well seeded swarm you wouldn't notice an issue. If you spend a lot of time down in 1-2 seed range, you're going to be running into instances where you're sitting there STALLED where uTorrent would be downloading just fine. What looks unseeded in qBittorrent ain't necessarily unseeded.

File: 2017-03-24-183107_1280x649_scrot.png (80KB, 1280x649px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x649px

>>59562943

File: Capture.png (89KB, 1653x603px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1653x603px

>>59562929
Deluge with nothing running vs uTorrent 2.2.1 maxing my 10Mbit.
I don't feel like reinstalling qB, but it suffers the same problems. I was running transfer tests between two PCs and accidentally left qB running. A day later I was running encoding speed tests and was wondering why I was getting inconsistent times. It was because qB was sitting there taking up 5% CPU.

File: top kek m8.png (95KB, 1360x629px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1360x629px

>>59563107
qB is running on my system, right now, and it's struggling to use 1% of my CPU.

>>59562239
I've been using qB for 3 years now and have never had a single problem with it.

>>59563107
>windows
mate...

>>59563024
hm, you're right, idk

File: 2016-09-19 11.44.43.jpg (50KB, 982x760px)

50KB, 982x760px

>>59563107
>windows 10
>utorrent
>fallout 4
actually kill yourself, I'm serious

rtorrent/rutorrent is the recommendation
however... qb got that search function

>>59563148
Link torrent.

>>59563197

ldd $(which qbittorrent) | grep -i 'gtk'

>>59563231
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:ac3d8153640c4a59993e213e607677d2b8d04b13&dn=Fairy%20Tail%201-495(Latest)&tr=http%3a%2f%2fopen.nyaatorrents.info%3a6544%2fannounce

>>59563245
nope

>>59563274
Ok, I also only see one seed on that.

>>59563380
Then he has ur ip. DOX'd.

>>59563380
I'm only connected to one and it's slow. When I'm done I'll be seeding it for a bit.

>>59563415
I didn't see him. That's qB for ya'.

>>59562239
Just you.

>>59563448
kek, still on the stalled meme, how about you post a torrent that stalls with qB but not utorrent? protip: you can't

>try uTorrent 2.2.1 because everyone on /g/ is sucking its dick
>after 5 seconds i get 100% disk usage error
>download drops on 100 Kbps


wew lad, thanks /g/

Works fine on my machine

Have you turned it off and then on again?

File: STALLEDtorrent.png (48KB, 1906x316px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 1906x316px

>>59563485
Like I said, don't feel like reinstalling and re- port forwarding. But here's the last test. qB on left, uT on right. qB only ever connected to two of the seeds showing in PTP's peer list. uT connected to the third.

>>59563537
It's pre-allocaing. You can turn that off, or up the cache to 1200MB, which will keep it downloading for a while while it preallocates. Don't go much higher than that since that'll crash it.

>>59562239
I had the opposite experience but why would you switch from a perfectly respectable torrent client if it worked fine?

>>59563735
This is a tech board, you know. If nobody ever tried anything new just because what we had was working we'd all be using uTorrent 1.6.1 or Vuze.

>>59563601
You already posted this shit a while ago and got BTFO.

>>59564113
Why do you have your entire identity linked to a torrent client when you don't even torrent?

>>59564173
What are you smoking?

There were just people on here a few days ago recommending other bit torrent clients because their deluge was so slow. It probably isn't the client... 0_o

>>59564217
It was posted back in October. Being in that thread and now that it was BTFO means you're the qB shill. We've long ago established that you don't torrent. Why do you do nothing but defend a client that can't connect for shit?

>>59564316
>people can only visit threads about something theyre interested in ONCE
If you dont like the client why the fuck youre still creating these threads and post stalled memes every single day? Youre clearly retarded or ut shill. For now ill guess former.

>>59564565
>If you dont like the client why the fuck youre still creating these threads and post stalled memes every single day?
I've never once created a torrent client thread on /g/. My trying qB and finding out for myself why it was called STALLEDtorrent was your fault. You were shilling it 24/7 for months and so I decided to try it. If you don't want people finding the flaws in your shitty software, DON'T TELL THEM TO TRY IT.

>>59564706
>shilling free software
Ayy lmao. Your autism reaching incredible levels. You got told hundreds of times already to just stop using qb if you have problems with it and go back to ushit yet youre acting like retard once again. Guess some people are just like that...

>>59564829
You and w4m are living proof that you can shill free software.

>>59564829
>just stop using qb
The only smart thing you've ever said.

>>59562239
>i was using X
>it worked perfectly fine
>i stopped using X

did you open your browser all on your own to make this thread?

>>59562325
So you use that crap named MPV too?

>>59564969
>I used a CRT
>it worked perfectly fine

>I used MS-DOS
>it worked perfectly fine

>>59564994
We can easily check that one. If it now has 2001 downloads, the answer is yes.

How is it that there are so many people that use qB without any issues? Yet the loudmouths on /g/ keep complaining? I already know there is an uncomfortably large number of tech illiterates on this board so it makes me believe their "issues" can easily be remedied.

>>59565025
>2001 downloads
lol

>>59564994
>mpv
>crap
pick one and only one

>>59565027
>How is it that there are so many people that use qB without any issues?
You know most people don't actually look at their torrent client 50 times a day with years of torrenting experience across dozens of clients, or test clients side by side, right? Most people have no frame of reference as to how their torrent client should be performing. A client failing to connect to 15/20/25% of peers will just go unnoticed because you never knew they were there. If it was no connection to anyone you'd know the problem is on your end, but getting some connections, you'd blame your shitty rates on a weak swarm. It takes someone with a ton of experience to notice something seems off just from its apparent performance.

>>59565169
You got this backwards. It's the fault of those outdated deprecated clients.

File: 04335552.jpg (44KB, 254x321px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 254x321px

>>59565169
>qbt uses libtorrent
>no such bug were ever known
>has only one example from his personal experience
>still forces "qstalled, cant connect to peers" meme
This is not funny anymore.

Do Deluge fags just shit on qbittorent for madeup fucking reasons?

>>59565169
>t. someone with a ton of experience
Dont make me laugh, nigger. Qbt is recommended client on many private trackers. Private trackers often has 1 seed on something and people have no problems downloading from them via Qbt. Otherwise it wouldve been known.

I hope this French fuck is happy about my seeding.

File: Hmm.png (442KB, 1080x2602px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1080x2602px

>>59565277
>Qbt is recommended client on many private trackers
Users know better.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-24 at 21.35.23-fullpage.png (13KB, 202x928px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 202x928px

>>59565304
What a bunch of scrubs
rtorrent is the best

>>59565408
It's a small 2 year old torrent. No seedbox racing potential. Larger ones have more rtorrent and Transmission, though still mostly uTorrent.

>>59565450
>still mostly uTorrent
What tracker?

>>59565304
your image seems to show the opposite of what you say

>>59565487
U2

>>59565564
Exactly how many qBittorrent users are you seeing?

>>59565304
>top uploader
>28.654 MiB
wtf

>>59565658
It's a 5MB torrent.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-24 at 22.08.04-fullpage.png (151KB, 314x5561px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 314x5561px

everyone knows rtorrent is the prefered client for avid torrent users

>>59565760
>paying to pirate

>>59565782
>implying

>>59565792
You didn't know rtorrent is a seedbox client?

>>59565810
you didnt know I dont pay for a seedbox?

>He fell for the libtorrent-rasterbar meme

Transmission, KTorrent, or rTorrent are the only torrent clients you should be using.

>>59565821
Take away all the seedboxes and pretty much nobody is using rtorrent.

>>59565860
proof?

>>59565872
Linux marketshare.

>>59565884
you'll have to do better than that

I swear, its the same kid that keeps making these threads.

>>59565937
>shill bad software
>expect not to get help threads

>>59565898
mpv marketshare

>>59565970
>spouting nonsense
giving up already?

>>59566031
Majority of trackers are video.
We can go on:

>number of Linux software private trackers.

Works on my machine™. Only switched to it because my build of BitTorrent from 2008 just stopped working for no reason. Just refuses to start up. What a cold day in my life that was. Felt like I lost a brother.

Deluge is a huge pile of waffles. Talk about shitty software.

>>59566042
so you're saying people who use linux dont use windows either? pretty ignorant.

>>59566090
Of course, because they're not installing software or watching movies on their seedboxes or routers.

>>59566144
I torrent movies on my linux pc and watch movies on my windows pc.

>>59566162
Why would you torrent on a Thinkpad?

>>59566178
why would you assume its a thinkpad? its not btw

>>59566193
I'm making fun of the fact that 99% of Linux users on /g/ only use it for shitposting on a Thinkpad.

>>59566214
>99%
If you say so

>>59562394
>t.fag who does not have a thinkpad and darn tough socks

>>59562239
qBit was shit for me too, fresh install of Windows 10

I now use Deluge

originally uTorrent 2.2

I'm using qbittorrent for 3 months but it's shit
i want to switch to rutorrent
What do you use to open the gui?
firefox is too slow
it's better to make a new profile without any addon only to open it or using a different browser?

>>59562239
werks perfectly for me
your computer is shite

>>59562239
qbittorent-16MB
utorrent221-350KB
They do the same things.
That should tell you a lot.

>>59568560

350KB + 1GB of included Windows libraries it uses.

I use BitComet.

qbittorent gives me I/O HDD errorsand stops my torrent

i scanned my HDD with the official WD tool and it said it has no errors

what the fuck is going on?

File: 521845_1.jpg (37KB, 800x687px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x687px

>>59562239

>>59570334
Most likely cause is something else trying to access the file while it downloads. Does it resume the download fine?

>>59570370
no

>>59562325
How's gentoo?

>>59570334
Not enough HDD space can be a cause. qbit needs like double the space of the actual file size for some reason while downloading.
Or maybe you're downloading straight to an external hard drive and it disconnected for a secon

>>59570439
dont bother, i already uninstalled it, thanks tho

>>59562239
Tixati doesn't have this problem

>>59570449
Oh well. What do you plan on replacing it with? Transmission or Deluge are good alternatives. Just please don't go back to uTorrent

>>59562239
https://aria2.github.io/

>120+ posts and only one mention of Tixati

Literally no problems, it just werks, good enough amount of features for me. I would have thought /g/ would have been all over it.

>>59573130
>I would have thought /g/ would have been all over [some proprietary software].
Well, I can't argue with your logic.