How old were you when you realized that OOP is the simplest,

>>59551637
When I was a kid I moved from basic to borland C++. I learned OOP was good about 15 years later cause fuck Borland.

>>59551722
C++ has shit OOP

>>59551813
OOP is optional in C++ but perfectly fine.

>>59551637
bastard mix of functional and oop is best

both are cunts to get anything done otherwise

>>59551813
>>59551722
Dumb people have shit brains.

>>59551637
Oh OP, you are too much.

Apparently, I'm not old enough.

File: oop.png (313KB, 1680x740px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1680x740px

>>59551637
p o o i n l o o

>>59553257
If you start with a shitty design, scrub, you indeed end up with poo in loo.

>>59551637
About 12 or 13, a few years later I realized I was wrong.

>>59551637
OOP is fine and dandy.

Retards that confuse OOP with meaning "MUH CLASSES" (which is a great deal of people using C++, C#, and Java) need to be banned from touching computers for the rest of their lives.

>>59553257
Oh hey, it's talking about you
>>59553976

>>59553267
Project evolution son, every project starts with a nice design with some flaws (You can't conceive a perfect design) but during its development the initial design flaws surfaces generating the mess on the right of >>59553257
image.

The only thing nice in practical OOP is that modern languages like Java and C# used in enterprise forces programmers into some sort of modularity, that can be helpful in middle project but will eventually be replaced by a multi paradigm design with a high speed language like C, C++ and some cases OCaml in end project.

>>59551637
12

>>59551637
When I switched from C++ and Java to Smalltalk.