Umm, anon, you're laptop display is ten eighty pee, right?

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-23 09-05-30.png (615KB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 3200x1800px

no its 1600x900

>>59536190
of course it is, it's a shame the color is so terrible though

>>59536190
But of course. And I would've gone higher if it had more eDP lanes.

File: lenovo-laptop-thinkpad-x270-hero.png (63KB, 725x515px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 725x515px

No faggot it's 1560x1440, it's not 2009 anymore. It's time to move on.

>>59536190
Of course not. It's 2736x1824, faggot.

>>59537214
2560*

1600x1200 faggot

>>59536380
Wish I can upgrade my t420s to an ips panel

>>59536190
1600x1200 eat a dick cunt

>>59536190
Hell, no.
You think I'd ruin this bone-stock perfect t420 by putting a 1080 meme screen on it?

>>59537214
>QHD
>12inch "laptop"
enjoy draining your battery for no benefit

My last one was 1280x800, my next one is going to be 1400x1050

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-23 18-38-38.png (766KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

766KB, 2560x1440px

>>59536190

File: 1472621585459.jpg (520KB, 831x1172px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 831x1172px

>>59537551
>that (((coincidence detector))) add-on in the top right corner

>tfw 720p

m-muh fonts are bitmap so I don't need anything better than 1366x768

>>59537248
>>59537214
>16:9
My Macbook Pro with Retina Display doesn't have that problem

>>59536190
no its heich-dee

768 is gud enuf

Yep.
W520 1920x1080.

Is 4k good enough for a laptop?

File: Clipboard-1080p.png (259KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1920x1080px

>>59536190
Yup.

>>59540732
>finnish os lang
>finnish int thread
>s4s

File: 1490121489966.jpg (58KB, 800x1054px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 800x1054px

>>59540997
lige boetery :D

>>59540677
Not even close, you need 8K at least

>16:9