Fucking hell just do adds already

Fucking hell, just give them $2/yr.

You've probably read tens of thousands of dollars worth of information in Britannica equivalent, hundreds of thousands if you count stuff sourced from academic journals. It's a bargain to keep it going.

>>59530721
Why not use adds? Everyone happy

>>59530731
sage goes in all fields you fucking retard

>>59530748
Because everybody uses adblock.

>>59530777
>what are mobile users

>>59530721
>You've probably read tens of thousands of dollars worth of information in Britannica equivalent, hundreds of thousands if you count stuff sourced from academic journals

Yet I still can't use Wikipedia for a university research paper like I could with Britannica.

>>59530647
>not disabling js on *.wikipedia.org

>>59530847
You can use the sources listed at the end, tard.

Just pull up the sources for the info you read in the article and cite out of those.

>>59530892
>You can use the sources listed at the end, tard

Kek HS dropout detected. If anything you use sources back to Wikipedia in any way it's automatically a shitty source and won't be accepted.

>>59530978
You use the sources that were used for the Wikipedia article.

If you copypaste any content directly from Wikipedia then you deserve to fail but there is nothing wrong with using the sources the writer used.

>>59530978
>Kek HS dropout detected
How's the last HS year? Don't be mad, friend, summer's almost here :)

>>59530647
in finland we don't get this because it's illegal

>>59531076
why the fuck would that be illegal?
what a backwards ass country

>>59531081
>Lain mukaan yritykset ja yhteisöt voivat kerätä vastikkeetonta rahaa ainoastaan viranomaisen myöntämällä rahankeräysluvalla. Wikipedialla ei tämän hetken tietojen mukaan ole lain vaatimaa lupaa kampanjaan.

they fall into a category where they need a permit

>>59531049

if your paper can be copied and pasted from wikipedia why are you writing it brainlet?

>>59530647
Welcome to Wikipedia™ 2.0, brought to you by Coca-Cola and many other generous donors!

> hmm I need to find some unbiased information about different beverage companies
Don't worry friend, Wikipedia™ is here with all the impartial facts you need!

>>59531134
that's even dumber
why would you need a permit to put something on your own website?

>>59530784
That's not everyone or the majority you fucking dumbass !!!

>>59530647
>ads on wikipedia
Great. Another site that uses XSS exploits through AdChoices.

>>59531201
I'm not a lawyer but I bet it has to do with the domain .fi

don't know, just remembered it was in the news

http://markofobbaforss.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/160324-rahankerayslaki-suomessa

here's something to google translate from our dear fobba

>>59531201
might be wrong but if I remember correctly the idea is basically to avoid scam fundraisers like someone setting up a fake story about their house or something burning down and then collecting money

i'm fine with it dying

>>59530784
>buying a phone that cannot be rooted and have adaway

File: 1256663523874.jpg (10KB, 251x189px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 251x189px

>>59530748
Because I prefer multiplications.
Unf.

>>59530978
How can anyone be this dumb?

>>59532219
>the majority of the android using population roots their phone

>>59530647
>Set up recurring $2/mo donations
>???
>Profit!

File: wikipedia.png (13KB, 444x571px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 444x571px

>>59530647

>>59530647
They should setup a patreon, normalfags love that shit.

>>59530647
If it was really threatened some rich guy would donate enough to keep it afloat for decades.

Don't be stupid.

>>59530847
>>59530892
>>59530978
>>59531049
>>59531159
I hate that anyone can edit and add some bullshit or incorrect bullshit. I heard people even get into editing wars or whatever.

>>59532870
>I read an xkcd panel once
Literally just follow the citations until you find something you can cite yourself, you fucking mongoloid.

requesting gib dimmy munnys pic

>>59532699
AKA repeated addition

>>59530784
you're a shit mobile user if you're not using an adblocker, even shitty ios has it, no excuses

>fake news spreads too easily
>fake news

>>59532796
>dat awful font rendering

Are you blind?

>>59533216
Rekt

File: wiki editor deals with sjw mods.png (795KB, 1416x8418px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 1416x8418px

>>59530647
fuck them and their sjw bullshit.

>>59530647
just wait until those banners turn red and orange and slide into view with a time delay, in a few weeks

it keeps happening

fuck them

>>59530784

I have adblock installed on Firefox for android. I'm legitimately confused by what you mean.

File: IMG_3119.jpg (45KB, 456x458px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 456x458px

>>59530721
>giving wikipedia money

Compare these two, friend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_pride
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_pride

>>59530647
>Fake news spreads too easily
Wikipedia has plenty of wrong shit. So many pages have literal autistic, feministic, communists, anarchist, whatever-else-is-popular-in-my-demented-ideology-ists that aim to misinterpret truth and make changes to shit. Anything political is trash.

Wikipedia is fine but you realize how wrong it can be when you actually have to write a research essay on a topic and start finding error after error on Wikipedia and dead citations/citations that don't claim what the people wrote.

Just a month ago I wrote an essay on electronic computers relating to NASA's early missions and there were constant errors in the wiki pages. They were mentioning the wrong models of system/360 computers for wrong generations and wrong amounts. Lots of the info on the technical data of early computers is plain wrong or odd. Sometimes mentions of instructions per second with dead citations or they'll just calculate it wrong and even then there should be some context like pointing out additions per second would have been different to divisions per second.

>>59530721
Wikipedia is biased.
>>59530647
Use infogalatica.com