I'm sorry but 4:3 simply made more sense than 16:9

it's ok man I forgive you

5:4

>>59515102
ok cool story bro well memed (you)

>>59515132
1280x1024 made so much sense

>>59515102
16:9 became popular because muh HD movies / games

imo 16:10 > 3:2 > 1:1 > 4:3 > 16:9 >>>>> 21:9

>>59515595

Never seen a 1:1 in person, but other than that you're correct.

>>59515102
I think 16:10 is the best of both worlds.

Smaller numbers = better.

1:1 master race.

File: Untitled.png (139KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1280x1024px

>>59515142
it's comfy

>>59515102
> Not 7:3
WTF is this heresy

>>59515102
>more sense
more sense for what, (you) ?

>>59515102
For actually doing computer tasks 4:3 makes more sense, for movies, and tv widescreen aspect ratios make more sense as that's what movies were filmed in.

>>59515102

Humans see wider viewing angle than 4:3, I had to use one recently 1024p so little screen space

16:10 is the best 16:9 is acceptable compromise

displays should have only ever been allowed to be fibonacci integer approximations of the golden ratio
1:2, 2:3, 3:5, 5:8, 8:13, 13:21, etc

4:3 is for autistic retards

>>59515595
4:3>16:9>3:2>16:10

>>59518185
Pythagorean triple 4:3 is cooler

>>59515102
9:8 is better

>>59515102
No need to apologize, I agree. Especially on laptops.

File: lg-g6-4578.jpg (47KB, 830x467px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 830x467px

2:1

>>59515102
>I'm sorry but 4:3 simply made more sense than 16:9
Explain

File: black-eye-patch-.jpg (51KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 600x600px

>>59515102
Are you pic related?

If you have 2 eyes on your face on a horizontal plane then wide its for you.

can't believe no one has yet posted a pic with an obviously superior TATE setup

>>59519088
But it's the same width with more height. 4:3 is 16:12. You can see the extra height just fine.

>>59519088
4:3 was actually chosen because humans have two eyes. 16:9 was actually chosen because it's a middleground between the proper 4:3 and whatever ratio cinemas use

>>59515102

It makes sense for non-east Asians and pirates of all walks of life.

desu 16:10 is the best combination of being decent for widescreen movies and still being good for everything else.
16:10 > 4:3 > 16:9 >> 1:1 >>>> 21:9

>>59521130
Fuck I forget about 3:2
It's more like 16:10 = 3:2 > 4:3 > 16:9 >>16:9 >>> 1:1 >> 2:9

File: AnneFrank.jpg (49KB, 498x329px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 498x329px

>>59515102
>Not six gorrilion:six gorrilion

>>59521378
> six gorrilion:six gorrilion
Not 7 : 44.

>>59521397
>2001 using anything but 9:11

>>59519029
I'm pretty fucking annoyed that "ultrawide" is 21:9 and not 2:1.

And that 16:10 caught on for a while over 3:2.

>>59515313
Not to be that guy but barely any games even had 16:9 support way up to 2006 it was mostly just the movie industry that forced that garbage down our throats.