Clock your monitors above 60Hz you stupid assholes.

ill clock ur mum over 60hz

>>59511938
I clocked my 10 year old Samsung Syncmaster to 70hz few weeks ago.

Still runs awesome.

>>59512216
Just go the highest possible. I've never seen or even heard anyone do any real damage. Those monitors just go blank if the mode is bad and a reboot (at the worst case) obviously fixes it.

>>59511938
can't my hp omen resets it back to 75 again if i do this. just can tune my freesync from 45-75 to 32-75

>>59511938
Guys how is LG 38UC99 monitor?
I am thinking of saving money to get it by June instead of going for dual monitor?

>>59511938
none of my screen are locked at 60 hz even my old 4:3 monitor is a 75hz

>>59511938
Tried this once, super fucked up my panel until it reset. Lines and blocking all over it.

Asus VH-236h and GTX670.

Had my 2515h at 75hz for a while, but the memory on my gcard wouldn't down clock and some of my weaboo games locked to 60hz anyway so I reverted, the 290 memory produces a lot of heat.

Lol my monitor only overclocks to 66hz. Waiting on a 1440p 144hz ultrawide before I buy a new monitor.

Overclocked mine a while ago from 60 to 75, it's stable but created a few black spots in the screen (barely noticeable), and could've been when I tried to overclock higher than 75.

give me $200 for a 144 you capitalist pig

>>59511938
Mine cant handle anything over 60hz, i've tried, even 61hz isn't possible.

>>59511996
:O

>>59512216
lol, I think your joke is lost on many here.

>>59511938
>implying I didn't
running my IPS234V-PN at 77Hz since I got it

>>59511938
this
both AMD and nVidia have monitor overclock utilities baked in their drivers now

File: 1489930912962.png (537KB, 720x721px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 720x721px

>>59511938
fuck you, i tried overclocking my monitor to 240hz and now it's dead

Mine goes up to 76, but sometimes it's unstable (especially with games) so I keep it at 75.

>>59511938
I got mine clocked at 72 with vertical+horizontal setup on both
72hz is optimal as for movies been recorded 24fps and hitting multiples of 24 avoid vertical tearing. Google it.

>>59511938

My Dell P2416D runs a @75.

>>59512716
Waiting for that as well. I'm pretty sure the displays themselves already exist but the problem is DP 1.2 can't do it.

File: 20170319_015241.jpg (274KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 1632x918px

xd

I'm running my monitor at 80Hz, massive difference.

>>59511938
is overclocking monitors a thing now?

how long until we have to liquid cool our monitors.

>>59514100
rgb liquid cooled monitors is the future. Cunt. Deal with it

>>59511938
lol I tried this meme last time it was a fad on /g/

Managed to overclock my 60fps monitor to 61 fps. Amazing.

>>59514113
You are stupid. Your monitor is shit. Next time buy a real brand like LG.

>>59514112
so whats left?

>OC mouse
>OC keyboard
>OC usb interface
>OC headphones
all of which can be liquid cooled of course.

>>59514172
PSU :^>

>>59514172
>no rgb
dropped

>>59514177
cant overclock a psu im afraid, all the relevant parts are analog.

you could probably overclock the fan controller though.

>>59514172
>>OC usb interface
That is a thing you stupid asshole.

Also, if you can't see a difference between 60FPS and 76FPS you are literally blind.

>>59514199
what about rgb? faggot

>>59514199
lol r u an idiot? human eye cant see more than 60 fps XD

>>59514204
fuck off linus

>>59514154
You sound rustled. Maybe you should gyrate your autism spinner to calm down?

>>59514226
>no rgb usb interface
lol fucking faggot get out

Can you OC your hard drive and ssd?

What about your bios?

ITT: retards that don't know how technology works

>>59511938
you can set a 1920x1080 screen to 1920x1200 with custom resolution too.

my monitor can only go over by 7 hz, not worth it

>>59511938
You can clock your LCD to 75Hz instead of 60Hz by using CVT-R instead CVT,
nothing new.

>>59512716
>>59513785
1440p Ultrawide 144Hz Freesync for a reasonable price when?

File: 1453647829599.png (74KB, 319x285px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 319x285px

>I overclocked my monitor, CPU, GPU, RAM, and USB ports .. I get blue screens and random blackouts every 15 minutes, but when it works, it's amazing!

144hz is enough for me thanks.

>>59514292
>only monitor, cpu, gpu, ram, usb
>not OCing your psu, fans, mouse, keyboard, headphones, router. water pump
oclets, when will they learn.

How do I OC my Dell monitors? nVidia card.
It's 60hz, but every game recognises it as 59....

>>59514195
Add more solder to the traces to carry more current.

>>59514273
no

>>59514367
The main tool that OCs monitors

https://www.monitortests.com/forum/Thread-Custom-Resolution-Utility-CRU?page=1

The latest AMD driver is kinda shitty at it, but 17.1.2 works fine.

>>59514292
>>59514332
There's no way to damage an OC monitor you retarded piece of shit. It doesn't even become unstable. It either goes blank and you revert (or reboot at the worst) or it just works or it it works with artifacts and revert again.

>>59511938
>killing his monitor life span
my 6 year old dell suddenly could not go 60Hz without spazzing out.
works fine at 50Hz though.
sold it off for $20.

>>59514172
My mouse / it's usb port is OC to 1kHz

File: screensize.png (137KB, 2560x2880px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 2560x2880px

>>59514291
25" 1440p with decent response times when?

>>59513696
>shoot video at 50fps
>feels like doing a film look
>discard every 2nd frame
>perfect film 25fps speed
PAL master race.

>>59514517
>tolerating PAL speedup
disgusting

>>59514517
> watching a slide-show
dropped
at least use blueskyFRC faggot

>>59511938
>2017
>not overclocking yourself

>>59514446
>>59514459
ayy lmao

>>59511938
>tfw artifacts at more than 60Hz
I guess this is the price for having an 1920x1200 SPVA

>>59514681
He didn't damage it you retarded piece of shit. He got artifacts when trying. There's no way to damage it, you just revert it back.

File: 1.gif (8KB, 256x264px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 256x264px

>>59514384
yes

Got this HP g6 at 110hz from 60, it looks like absolute trash however.

>>59511938
Oc'd my 120hz monitor to 144hz.
No lines or anything, feelin pretty good.

Asus vx228; i could go all the way to 75 Hz but decided to stay at 72 Hz since it's a multiple of 24

>>59514939
>implying you can tell the difference

WOW i went from 60 to 61hz

>>59515159
try DVI, I had way better results over DVI than HDMI

>>59511938
its a 4k monitor and displayport 2.0 doesnt have the bandwidth.

>>59515181
i have vga monitor.
75hz works but it has jagged edges and vibrates

>>59514737
>revert it back
>can't do 60Hz anymore

Something doesn't add up here, dumbass.

>>59515237
That sucks man, I guess it's not really worth it then

>>59515237
VGA signal rapidly degrades at anything over 1920x1200 60Hz. Even at that res/refresh you need a high quality cable.

>>59515266
why would it? vga has worked fine with crts that had much higher resolutions than that.

File: 17392973_10210824329776617_1826616695_n.jpg (48KB, 450x800px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 450x800px

>>59514292
sounds life changing!

File: 20032017061.jpg (951KB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

951KB, 2592x1944px

>>59515266
ah i see. its just a cheap thin cable.
maybe if that monitor dies i can buy a new one with better connection.

>>59514367
try opening the control panel

>>59515039
There is a very noticable difference. Other than placebo shit.

>>59515357
is that vista

jesus fuck I miss that taskbar

>>59515377
>he cant tell the difference between genuine vista and a skinned windows 7

>>59515394
joke's on you

that's xfce with a vista skin

>>59515370
science doesn't support your claim

>>59514172
overclock your HDD to run at higher than 7200rpm.

SSDs can't do that.

>>59511938
My 2005 Samsung monitor has supported 75 Hz out of the box.

File: faggot.jpg (21KB, 391x285px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 391x285px

>>59515449
no its not

>tfw mine didn't like going beyond 65Hz last time I tried

Why didn't 16:10 take off, /g/?

>>59515701
16:9 is slightly cheaper to make

I've got my Acer H236HL at 78Hz FeelsGoodMan

>>59515656
winkel :DDDD

File: syncmaster795mb.jpg (84KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 900x600px

>>59515615
My 2004 Samsung monitor supported 100Hz out of the box.

>>59511938

It serves no purpose.

>>59514599
That is why coke is available

>>59515929
my 2000 dell monitor supported 120Hz out of the box

>>59515550
sorry you have shit eyes.

File: 00075upset.jpg (35KB, 574x635px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 574x635px

I have a 5k iMav though.

>>59517590
I mean 5k iMac.
How do you edit posts on 4chan?

>>59514291
Never : (

>>59517321
Sorry you have shit for brains. Retard.

My U2414H only goes up to 71Hz and this is with CVT reduced. Everything between 60-71Hz is pointless since it's not a multiple of 12 which means stuttering in movies, tv shows etc. Not worth it.

How far can I overclock native 240hz monitor i need more fpses for competitive online shooting games

I'm not a gaymer, so why would I need more than 60 Hz?

>>59511938
crt masterrace.
>he's not using a 200 hz monitor with 0 input lag

>>59512216
This. Mine still works at 75hz

>>59511938
Mine overclocks to 61hz, kek

>>59518940
>200hz
>analog display
Enjoy your 640x480 anon.

>>59518413
Update

I got it to run at 72Hz over HDMI, but I had to use custom timings. I won't even bother trying 72+Hz. I passed the frame skip test and everything seems to be fine, no artifacts, weird noises or anything.

>but 75hz 1080p monitor
>won't let me select 75hz
>use cru to add it
I learned last week actually that it only supports 60hz on 1080p, been forcing 75 for years. Bullshit marketing.

so how much of a difference would 15 extra frames
make? is it notably smoother?

can I overclock my gateway FHX2153L?

>Dell U2414H
>Only clocks to 66 Hz
It's almost not worth it.

>>59520066
>is it notably smoother?
Yes, but it's nowhere near as perceptible compared 60 to 120Hz.

>>59520140
Probably though you haven't even tried doing it since you posted that question. Just do it and come back with results.

File: u2414h.jpg (49KB, 381x412px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 381x412px

>>59520251
Download CRU and use pic related timings. Mine works at 72Hz (and probably higher, haven't tried). The maximum it goes with default timings is 67 or 68.

Make sure you use CRU and not Nvidia's or AMD's control panel because some of the settings are missing.

How?
I have Asus VX279Q

>>59520375
CRU or through your graphics drivers

>>59517321
Condescend more retard, he's right.

I have the 23ea53 and it's 75mhz out of the box.
so, 1 mhz oc?

>>59520308
Cheers, man. The resolution doesn't seem to appear anywhere in display adapter properties or NVIDIA control panel, however. Are the timings specific to HDMI or should they work with DisplayPort as well?

>>59520504
You can probably get it to 80Hz

WTF IS THIS WHY WON'T NVIDIA MAKE MAYMAY 3MHz WATERCOOLED MONITORS?!?!

>>59520298
well, just did it and it seems to overclock to 75 Hz just fine...

>>59520667
Nice shit, Fàm

>>59520532
>The resolution doesn't seem to appear anywhere in display adapter properties or NVIDIA control panel
First make sure you applied the settings correctly in CRU. When you open CRU, make sure the dropdown menu is U2414H active. Under "detailed resolutions" (the first box with your current resoltuion and refresh rate) click on "add" and set the timings and refresh rate. Once you've done that, click ok and exit CRU. In the directory where CRU is installed, run the restart64.exe. Your screen will refresh or go blank for a second.

Once you've done that click on start, search for "display". Click on advanced display settings, display adapter properties, monitor and you should be able to choose 72Hz in the dropdown menu. Apply and ok. The screen will go blank and you're done.

my monitor only went to 66hz on dvi
switched to hdmi and I got it to 72hz

>>59520695
I did all that, but it turns out the settings are unique to HDMI (and possibly DVI). There were no refresh rate options for DisplayPort, but there were after I switched in an HDMI lead. I don't really know why, though.

>have 4k IPS monitor
Lol no thanks

>>59520741
Just use HDMI then.

>>59520741
Actually, on second thought, I'm pretty sure you have to repeat all the steps for DisplayPort. I remember that switching between cables reset all the display settings both in Nvidia control panel and display settings in windows.

>>59520850
I do too. I've tried it but I get frame skipping even at 65
It's only in select camera photos. Not all.
Would I have better luck using cru like this anon?
>>59520308

How about laptops, anyone had any luck?

>>59511938
RL2460HT here, the tiny boost from 60hz to 75hz is amazing, just enough to remove the god awful choppiness and trail. Didn't break my monitor.

60hz 1440p IPS and 144hz freesync dual monitor master race

>>59520695
what the fuck are you doing CRU is an AMD specific tool

>>59521410
The internal monitor refuses to take anything that isn't already in the list, even if it should be able to handle the bandwidth eg 720p at 75 but not 720p at 72. It's an Optimus notebook, Intel HD runs the desktop, Nvidia GPU sends framebuffers to the integrated so no switching.
External monitors work just fine. Not an overclock per se since it supports 24 to 120 Hz, but I set my Projector to run at 48 Hz. Good compromise between performance, 24 Hz multiple, and smoothness.

>>59511938

Why?

Anyone done this with a 2209WA? They already support 75Hz modes anyway.

I run 2 4K monitors on Intel HD 530 over DisplayPort, ain't no way they're going past 60Hz

Even when I do eventually do my new build, they're not going above 60Hz. There's just not enough bandwidth

>>59521920

Idiot.

>Custom Resolution Utility (CRU) allows custom resolutions to be defined for both AMD/ATI and NVIDIA GPUs by creating EDID overrides directly in the registry without dealing with .inf files.

My max is 75, which is what I have it set to. No problems for me unless I go above 75.

>>59514172
>OC mouse
>OC keyboard
>OC usb interface
Sort of already exists if you consider 1KHz polling rate mice/keyboards

>>59520504
What? No. It's definitely 60Hz here (on default) on any OS.

Maybe you have a version 2 or similar.

>>59520538
It blanks here.

>>59520712
HDMI has new versions with very high bandwidth. In all likelihood a new-ish GPU + a new-ish monitor can easily go to very high timings on 1080p. It even supports 10K + 120Hz on the latest version!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Version_comparison

>>59521410
Yes, I easily got an HP to go 75. It had an AMD HD 5000.

No, it looks really weird. I can clock my monitor over 75hz, but the cursor skips like a motherfucker. There's no point. It looks really weird.

>>59523747
You are stupid. Your monitor doesn't support it. Not all monitors are like that.

>>59524727
I have a 120hz monitor that supports 100hz and 110hz resolutions without doing any tampering.

Those look pretty much the same, they awkwardly seem to skip shit.

>>59524748
Above 70Hz it starts being harder to see differences. At 100Hz and above it's minuscule meme gains. The human eye can not distinguish anything above 150FPS when it was tested on very healthy pilots.